[Evidence-Based Practices in Episiotomy Care].

Asuman Çobanoğlu, Merdiye Şendir
{"title":"[Evidence-Based Practices in Episiotomy Care].","authors":"Asuman Çobanoğlu, Merdiye Şendir","doi":"10.26650/FNJN345977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the research associated with wound healing process in episiotomy care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The search for this study was conducted through the international databases of Cochrane, Science Direct, Medline, Medine Complete, CIHANL, Scopus, AcademicSearch Complete, Complementary Index and ULAKBIM medical database among the National Databases between May 1 and July 17, 2017. \"Episiotomy care\" and \"episiotomy wound healing\" were used as key words during the search. A total of 23 publications compliant with the inclusion criteria were included in the study and were evaluated in terms of comparisons, restrictions, and results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies about episiotomy care were evaluated under four headings such as the use of antiseptic solutions, use of dry/wet and hot and cold applications, laser and light therapy, and the use of aromatic oils and phytotherapy in episiotomy care. Among the 23 studies included in this study, 17 were designed as experimental and 6 as half-experimental and a total of 2.408 puerperal women participated in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this literature review revealed a limited number of research findings on the care of episiotomy wounds and a necessity of performance of new studies on this subject was established.</p>","PeriodicalId":73032,"journal":{"name":"Florence Nightingale hemsirelik dergisi","volume":" ","pages":"48-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/86/92/fnjn-27-1-48.PMC8127595.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Florence Nightingale hemsirelik dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/FNJN345977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the research associated with wound healing process in episiotomy care.

Method: The search for this study was conducted through the international databases of Cochrane, Science Direct, Medline, Medine Complete, CIHANL, Scopus, AcademicSearch Complete, Complementary Index and ULAKBIM medical database among the National Databases between May 1 and July 17, 2017. "Episiotomy care" and "episiotomy wound healing" were used as key words during the search. A total of 23 publications compliant with the inclusion criteria were included in the study and were evaluated in terms of comparisons, restrictions, and results.

Results: Studies about episiotomy care were evaluated under four headings such as the use of antiseptic solutions, use of dry/wet and hot and cold applications, laser and light therapy, and the use of aromatic oils and phytotherapy in episiotomy care. Among the 23 studies included in this study, 17 were designed as experimental and 6 as half-experimental and a total of 2.408 puerperal women participated in this study.

Conclusion: The results of this literature review revealed a limited number of research findings on the care of episiotomy wounds and a necessity of performance of new studies on this subject was established.

Abstract Image

[会阴切开术护理的循证实践]。
目的:本研究的目的是系统地评价与会阴切开术护理中伤口愈合过程相关的研究。方法:于2017年5月1日至7月17日,通过Cochrane、Science Direct、Medline、Medine Complete、CIHANL、Scopus、AcademicSearch Complete、Complementary Index和国家数据库中的ULAKBIM医学数据库对本研究进行检索。检索时以“会阴切开术护理”和“会阴切开术伤口愈合”为关键词。共有23篇符合纳入标准的出版物被纳入研究,并在比较、限制和结果方面进行了评估。结果:从消毒液的使用、干湿、冷热应用、激光和光疗、芳香油和植物疗法在会阴切开术护理中的应用四个方面对会阴切开术护理的研究进行了评价。本研究纳入的23项研究中,17项为实验研究,6项为半实验研究,共2408名产褥期妇女参与本研究。结论:本文献综述的结果表明,关于会阴切口伤口护理的研究成果有限,有必要开展新的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信