Telestroke: Maintaining Quality Acute Stroke Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Theresa Sevilis, Mark McDonald, Amanda Avila, Gregory Heath, Lan Gao, Gayle O'Brien, Mohammed Zaman, Adam Heller, Muhammad Masud, Nima Mowzoon, Thomas Devlin
{"title":"Telestroke: Maintaining Quality Acute Stroke Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Theresa Sevilis,&nbsp;Mark McDonald,&nbsp;Amanda Avila,&nbsp;Gregory Heath,&nbsp;Lan Gao,&nbsp;Gayle O'Brien,&nbsp;Mohammed Zaman,&nbsp;Adam Heller,&nbsp;Muhammad Masud,&nbsp;Nima Mowzoon,&nbsp;Thomas Devlin","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted acute stroke care globally. Decreased stroke presentations and concern for delays in acute stroke care have been identified. This study evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on the timely treatment of patients with thrombolytics at hospitals utilizing telestroke acute stroke services. <b>Methods:</b> Acute stroke consultations seen in 171 hospitals (19 states) via telestroke from December 1, 2019, to June 27, 2020, were extracted from the TeleCare™ database. The consults were divided into pre-COVID and COVID groups (March 15, 2020, start of COVID group). The consults were reviewed for age, sex, hospital, state, date seen, last known normal, arrival time, consult call time, needle time, thrombolytic candidate, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. The total number of consults, median door to needle (DTN) time for emergency department (ED) patients, and call to needle (CTN) time for inpatients were calculated. <b>Results:</b> Pre-COVID, 15,226 stroke consults were evaluated compared with 11,105 in the COVID group, a 27% decrease. Pre-COVID, 1,071 ED patients (7.9%) received thrombolytics and 66 inpatients (4.0%), while COVID, 813 ED patients (8.2%) and 70 inpatients (5.7%). The median DTN time for ED patients pre-COVID was 42 (32, 55) versus 40 (31, 52) in the COVID group, with no statistically significant difference between groups. CTN time pre-COVID was 53 (35, 67) versus 46 (35, 61) in the COVID group, with no statistically significant difference between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Telestroke assessments allowed for uninterrupted acute stroke care and treatment stability despite nursing and other resource realignments triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"481-485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058863/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted acute stroke care globally. Decreased stroke presentations and concern for delays in acute stroke care have been identified. This study evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on the timely treatment of patients with thrombolytics at hospitals utilizing telestroke acute stroke services. Methods: Acute stroke consultations seen in 171 hospitals (19 states) via telestroke from December 1, 2019, to June 27, 2020, were extracted from the TeleCare™ database. The consults were divided into pre-COVID and COVID groups (March 15, 2020, start of COVID group). The consults were reviewed for age, sex, hospital, state, date seen, last known normal, arrival time, consult call time, needle time, thrombolytic candidate, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. The total number of consults, median door to needle (DTN) time for emergency department (ED) patients, and call to needle (CTN) time for inpatients were calculated. Results: Pre-COVID, 15,226 stroke consults were evaluated compared with 11,105 in the COVID group, a 27% decrease. Pre-COVID, 1,071 ED patients (7.9%) received thrombolytics and 66 inpatients (4.0%), while COVID, 813 ED patients (8.2%) and 70 inpatients (5.7%). The median DTN time for ED patients pre-COVID was 42 (32, 55) versus 40 (31, 52) in the COVID group, with no statistically significant difference between groups. CTN time pre-COVID was 53 (35, 67) versus 46 (35, 61) in the COVID group, with no statistically significant difference between groups. Conclusions: Telestroke assessments allowed for uninterrupted acute stroke care and treatment stability despite nursing and other resource realignments triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中风:在COVID-19大流行期间保持高质量的急性中风护理。
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对全球急性卒中护理产生了重大影响。减少中风的表现和关注延迟急性中风护理已确定。本研究评估了COVID-19对医院利用远程急性卒中服务及时治疗溶栓患者的影响。方法:从TeleCare™数据库中提取2019年12月1日至2020年6月27日期间,美国19个州171家医院通过电话卒中进行的急性卒中会诊。将患者分为预冠组和新冠组(2020年3月15日,新冠组开始)。对会诊者的年龄、性别、医院、州、就诊日期、最后已知的正常情况、到达时间、会诊呼叫时间、针头时间、溶栓候选患者和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分进行回顾。计算会诊总人数、急诊科(ED)患者门到针的中位数时间(DTN)和住院患者呼针时间(CTN)。结果:与COVID组的11105名卒中咨询者相比,COVID前卒中咨询者评估了15226名,减少了27%。术前接受溶栓治疗的ED患者1071例(7.9%),住院患者66例(4.0%),而新冠肺炎患者813例(8.2%),住院患者70例(5.7%)。ED患者在COVID前的中位DTN时间为42(32,55),而COVID组为40(31,52),组间差异无统计学意义。COVID组CTN时间为53(35,67),而COVID组为46(35,61),组间差异无统计学意义。结论:尽管COVID-19大流行引发了护理和其他资源调整,但远程卒中评估仍可实现不间断的急性卒中护理和治疗稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信