Integration of family planning services into HIV services in Nigeria: Evidence from the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 survey in seven states.

Babayemi O Olakunde, Daniel A Adeyinka, Funmilola M OlaOlorun, Tolulope T Oladele, Hidayat Yahaya, Chinwendu D Ndukwe
{"title":"Integration of family planning services into HIV services in Nigeria: Evidence from the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 survey in seven states.","authors":"Babayemi O Olakunde,&nbsp;Daniel A Adeyinka,&nbsp;Funmilola M OlaOlorun,&nbsp;Tolulope T Oladele,&nbsp;Hidayat Yahaya,&nbsp;Chinwendu D Ndukwe","doi":"10.2989/16085906.2021.1925312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite global calls for stronger linkages between family planning and HIV, a growing body of evidence in sub-Saharan Africa suggests that the integration of family planning and HIV service delivery is suboptimal in some countries. In this study, we assess the integration and quality of family planning services in health facilities that provide HIV-related services in Nigeria. This study analysed secondary data from the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 cross-sectional survey conducted between May and July 2016 in seven states in Nigeria. Our study sample was restricted to 290 health facilities providing HIV services. We performed descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses. Ninety-five per cent of the health facilities reported offering family planning counselling, provision of family planning methods, and/or referral for family planning methods to clients accessing HIV services. About 84% of these health facilities with integrated family planning and HIV services reported that they discussed the preferred method, dual methods, instructions and side effects of the chosen method, and the reproductive intentions with clients during an HIV consultation. None of the health facilities' characteristics was significantly associated with the integration of family planning services into HIV services. Private health facilities (aOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.07-0.92), urban health facilities (aOR 3.8, 95% CI 1.64-8.76), and provision of postnatal care (aOR 3.9, 95% CI 1.10-13.74) were statistically associated with the quality of family planning services provided to clients accessing HIV services. Family planning services were integrated into HIV services in a majority of the health facilities in our study. However, our findings indicate the need for improvement in the quality of family planning services provided to clients accessing HIV services.</p>","PeriodicalId":520548,"journal":{"name":"African journal of AIDS research : AJAR","volume":" ","pages":"181-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of AIDS research : AJAR","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2021.1925312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite global calls for stronger linkages between family planning and HIV, a growing body of evidence in sub-Saharan Africa suggests that the integration of family planning and HIV service delivery is suboptimal in some countries. In this study, we assess the integration and quality of family planning services in health facilities that provide HIV-related services in Nigeria. This study analysed secondary data from the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 cross-sectional survey conducted between May and July 2016 in seven states in Nigeria. Our study sample was restricted to 290 health facilities providing HIV services. We performed descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses. Ninety-five per cent of the health facilities reported offering family planning counselling, provision of family planning methods, and/or referral for family planning methods to clients accessing HIV services. About 84% of these health facilities with integrated family planning and HIV services reported that they discussed the preferred method, dual methods, instructions and side effects of the chosen method, and the reproductive intentions with clients during an HIV consultation. None of the health facilities' characteristics was significantly associated with the integration of family planning services into HIV services. Private health facilities (aOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.07-0.92), urban health facilities (aOR 3.8, 95% CI 1.64-8.76), and provision of postnatal care (aOR 3.9, 95% CI 1.10-13.74) were statistically associated with the quality of family planning services provided to clients accessing HIV services. Family planning services were integrated into HIV services in a majority of the health facilities in our study. However, our findings indicate the need for improvement in the quality of family planning services provided to clients accessing HIV services.

尼日利亚将计划生育服务纳入艾滋病毒服务:来自七个州的《2020年绩效监测和问责制》调查的证据。
尽管全球呼吁加强计划生育与艾滋病毒之间的联系,但撒哈拉以南非洲越来越多的证据表明,在一些国家,计划生育与提供艾滋病毒服务的结合并不理想。在本研究中,我们评估了在尼日利亚提供艾滋病毒相关服务的卫生设施中计划生育服务的整合和质量。本研究分析了2016年5月至7月在尼日利亚七个州进行的《2020年绩效监测和问责制》横断面调查的二手数据。我们的研究样本仅限于290家提供艾滋病毒服务的卫生机构。我们进行了描述性统计和二元逻辑回归分析。95%的保健设施报告说,向获得艾滋病毒服务的客户提供计划生育咨询、提供计划生育方法和/或转介计划生育方法。在这些提供计划生育和艾滋病毒综合服务的卫生机构中,约84%报告说,它们在艾滋病毒咨询期间与客户讨论了首选方法、双重方法、所选方法的说明和副作用以及生殖意图。保健设施的特点与将计划生育服务纳入艾滋病毒服务没有显著关系。私立卫生机构(aOR为0.3,95% CI为0.07-0.92)、城市卫生机构(aOR为3.8,95% CI为1.64-8.76)和提供产后护理(aOR为3.9,95% CI为1.10-13.74)与向获得艾滋病毒服务的客户提供的计划生育服务质量在统计学上相关。在我们的研究中,大多数卫生机构将计划生育服务纳入了艾滋病毒服务。然而,我们的研究结果表明,需要提高向获得艾滋病毒服务的客户提供的计划生育服务的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信