Surrogacy reform and its impact on the child’s right to birth registration

Q1 Social Sciences
Elaine O'Callaghan
{"title":"Surrogacy reform and its impact on the child’s right to birth registration","authors":"Elaine O'Callaghan","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The regulation and reform of surrogacy law will inevitably have an impact on the system of birth registration and the content of birth certificates. This Commentary considers deliberations around reform in Ireland, the UK and Australia, where different approaches have been adopted. In Ireland, for example, a surrogacy certificate has been proposed that will not reference the fact that the child was born as a result of surrogacy. Meanwhile, in the UK, it is proposed that the full birth certificate will record that it was a surrogate birth but will not record the identity of the surrogate. In Australia, a review of the role of states and territories regulating surrogacy has emphasized that not enough information is being recorded on birth certificates to safeguard children’s rights. I conclude that it is time to assess the purpose of a birth certificate and consider its role in realizing the child’s rights to birth registration and to identity under international human rights law.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"13 ","pages":"Pages 46-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.06.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661821000137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The regulation and reform of surrogacy law will inevitably have an impact on the system of birth registration and the content of birth certificates. This Commentary considers deliberations around reform in Ireland, the UK and Australia, where different approaches have been adopted. In Ireland, for example, a surrogacy certificate has been proposed that will not reference the fact that the child was born as a result of surrogacy. Meanwhile, in the UK, it is proposed that the full birth certificate will record that it was a surrogate birth but will not record the identity of the surrogate. In Australia, a review of the role of states and territories regulating surrogacy has emphasized that not enough information is being recorded on birth certificates to safeguard children’s rights. I conclude that it is time to assess the purpose of a birth certificate and consider its role in realizing the child’s rights to birth registration and to identity under international human rights law.

代孕改革及其对儿童出生登记权的影响
《代孕法》的调整和改革,必然会对出生登记制度和出生证明内容产生影响。本评论考虑了爱尔兰、英国和澳大利亚围绕改革的审议,在这些国家采取了不同的方法。例如,在爱尔兰,已经提出了一份代孕证明,其中不会提及孩子是由于代孕而出生的事实。与此同时,在英国,有人提议,完整的出生证明将记录这是代孕,但不会记录代孕者的身份。在澳大利亚,对各州和地区监管代孕的作用进行的一项审查强调,出生证明上没有记录足够的信息来保护儿童的权利。我的结论是,现在是评估出生证明的目的并考虑其在实现儿童根据国际人权法获得出生登记和身份的权利方面的作用的时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: RBMS is a new journal dedicated to interdisciplinary discussion and debate of the rapidly expanding field of reproductive biomedicine, particularly all of its many societal and cultural implications. It is intended to bring to attention new research in the social sciences, arts and humanities on human reproduction, new reproductive technologies, and related areas such as human embryonic stem cell derivation. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy makers, academics and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信