{"title":"Assessment of Breast Cancer Treatment Delay Impact on Prognosis and Survival: a Look at the Evidence from Systematic Analysis of the Literature.","authors":"Faustine Williams","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer has remained the most commonly diagnosed disease among women globally. Despite the advancement in biomedical sciences leading to improve survival outcomes, some patients endure longer wait periods prior to initiation of treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To elucidate the impact of treatment delay on breast cancer patient's quality of life and survivorship. Second was to determine the optimal length of time (delay) between breast cancer diagnosis and start of first treatment in order to improve prognosis and general health and well-being of survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic search of the literature was conducted across five electronic databases: Pub Med, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and Science Direct as well as the reference list of all articles retrieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 articles were included in the evidence based systematic review, which comprised of 255,366 observations. The results of the studies were categorized under five main themes as: study characteristics, cancer staging and classification, treatment delay time definition and interval, treatment regimen classification and delay impact on quality of life and survival. Analyzed wait times from diagnosis to the initiation of first therapy ranged from 7 days to a period of over 180 days. Combinations of standardized treatment including loco-regional radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy surgery as well as hormonal therapy were examined. Even though some of the studies showed mixed results, overall, findings indicated that early detection, diagnosis and initiation of treatment within 90 days increase survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence revealed that delaying the initiation of treatment for breast cancer more than 90 days after diagnosis has a detrimental effect on disease free and overall well-being of survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":90581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer biology & research","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8274552/pdf/nihms-1607067.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer biology & research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer has remained the most commonly diagnosed disease among women globally. Despite the advancement in biomedical sciences leading to improve survival outcomes, some patients endure longer wait periods prior to initiation of treatment.
Objective: To elucidate the impact of treatment delay on breast cancer patient's quality of life and survivorship. Second was to determine the optimal length of time (delay) between breast cancer diagnosis and start of first treatment in order to improve prognosis and general health and well-being of survivors.
Methods: Systematic search of the literature was conducted across five electronic databases: Pub Med, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and Science Direct as well as the reference list of all articles retrieved.
Results: A total of 33 articles were included in the evidence based systematic review, which comprised of 255,366 observations. The results of the studies were categorized under five main themes as: study characteristics, cancer staging and classification, treatment delay time definition and interval, treatment regimen classification and delay impact on quality of life and survival. Analyzed wait times from diagnosis to the initiation of first therapy ranged from 7 days to a period of over 180 days. Combinations of standardized treatment including loco-regional radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy surgery as well as hormonal therapy were examined. Even though some of the studies showed mixed results, overall, findings indicated that early detection, diagnosis and initiation of treatment within 90 days increase survival.
Conclusions: Evidence revealed that delaying the initiation of treatment for breast cancer more than 90 days after diagnosis has a detrimental effect on disease free and overall well-being of survivors.
导言:乳腺癌仍然是全球妇女中最常诊断的疾病。尽管生物医学科学的进步导致生存结果的改善,但一些患者在开始治疗之前要忍受更长的等待期。目的:探讨治疗延迟对乳腺癌患者生活质量及生存期的影响。其次是确定乳腺癌诊断和开始首次治疗之间的最佳时间长度(延迟),以改善预后和幸存者的总体健康和福祉。方法:系统检索Pub Med、EMBASE、CINAHL、Scopus和Science Direct 5个电子数据库的文献,并检索到所有文献的参考文献列表。结果:以证据为基础的系统评价共纳入33篇文章,其中包括255,366个观察结果。研究结果分为五个主题:研究特征、癌症分期和分类、治疗延迟时间定义和间隔、治疗方案分类和延迟对生活质量和生存的影响。从诊断到开始第一次治疗的分析等待时间从7天到180多天不等。检查了包括局部局部放疗、全身化疗手术以及激素治疗在内的标准化治疗组合。尽管一些研究结果好坏参半,但总体而言,研究结果表明,早期发现、诊断和在90天内开始治疗可以提高生存率。结论:有证据表明,乳腺癌诊断后延迟开始治疗超过90天对幸存者的无病和整体福祉有不利影响。