Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples.

Lidija Rakic, Elena Kostova, Ben J Cohlen, Astrid Ep Cantineau
{"title":"Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples.","authors":"Lidija Rakic,&nbsp;Elena Kostova,&nbsp;Ben J Cohlen,&nbsp;Astrid Ep Cantineau","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD003854.pub2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In subfertile couples, couples who have tried to conceive for at least one year, intrauterine insemination (IUI) with ovarian hyperstimulation (OH) is one of the treatment modalities that can be offered. When IUI is performed a second IUI in the same cycle might add to the chances of conceiving. In a previous update of this review in 2010 it was shown that double IUI increases pregnancy rates when compared to single IUI. Since 2010, different clinical trials have been published with differing conclusions about whether double IUI increases pregnancy rates compared to single IUI.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effectiveness and safety of double intrauterine insemination (IUI) compared to single IUI in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL in July 2020 and LILACS, Google scholar and Epistemonikos in February 2021, together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomised controlled, parallel trials of double versus single IUIs in stimulated cycles in subfertile couples.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We identified in nine studies involving subfertile women. The evidence was of low quality; the main limitations were unclear risk of bias, inconsistent results for some outcomes and imprecision, due to small trials with imprecise results. We are uncertain whether double IUI improves live birth rate compared to single IUI (odds ratio (OR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 1.88; I<sup>2</sup> = 29%; studies = 3, participants = 468; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that if the chance of live birth following single IUI is 16%, the chance of live birth following double IUI would be between 12% and 27%. Performing a sensitivity analysis restricted to only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with low risk of selection bias showed similar results. We are uncertain whether double IUI reduces miscarriage rate compared to single IUI (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.98 to 3.24; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; studies = 6, participants = 2363; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that chance of miscarriage following single IUI is 1.5% and the chance following double IUI would be between 1.5% and 5%. The reported clinical pregnancy rate per woman randomised may increase with double IUI group (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.86; I<sup>2</sup> = 34%; studies = 9, participants = 2716; low quality evidence). This result should be interpreted with caution due to the low quality of the evidence and the moderate inconsistency. The evidence suggests that the chance of a pregnancy following single IUI is 14% and the chance following double IUI would be between 16% and 23%. We are uncertain whether double IUI affects multiple pregnancy rate compared to single IUI (OR 2.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 4.56; I<sup>2</sup> = 8%; studies = 5; participants = 2203; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that chance of multiple pregnancy following single IUI is 0.7% and the chance following double IUI would be between 0.85% and 3.7%. We are uncertain whether double IUI has an effect on ectopic pregnancy rate compared to single IUI (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.28; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; studies = 4, participants = 1048; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that the chance of an ectopic pregnancy following single IUI is 0.8% and the chance following double IUI would be between 0.3% and 3.2%.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>Our main analysis, of which the evidence is low quality, shows that we are uncertain if double IUI improves live birth and reduces miscarriage compared to single IUI. Our sensitivity analysis restricted to studies of low risk of selection bias for both outcomes is consistent with the main analysis. Clinical pregnancy rate may increase in the double IUI group, but this should be interpreted with caution due to the low quality evidence. We are uncertain whether double IUI has an effect on multiple pregnancy rate and ectopic pregnancy rate compared to single IUI.</p>","PeriodicalId":515753,"journal":{"name":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews","volume":" ","pages":"CD003854"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/14651858.CD003854.pub2","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003854.pub2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: In subfertile couples, couples who have tried to conceive for at least one year, intrauterine insemination (IUI) with ovarian hyperstimulation (OH) is one of the treatment modalities that can be offered. When IUI is performed a second IUI in the same cycle might add to the chances of conceiving. In a previous update of this review in 2010 it was shown that double IUI increases pregnancy rates when compared to single IUI. Since 2010, different clinical trials have been published with differing conclusions about whether double IUI increases pregnancy rates compared to single IUI.

Objectives: To determine the effectiveness and safety of double intrauterine insemination (IUI) compared to single IUI in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL in July 2020 and LILACS, Google scholar and Epistemonikos in February 2021, together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled, parallel trials of double versus single IUIs in stimulated cycles in subfertile couples.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information.

Main results: We identified in nine studies involving subfertile women. The evidence was of low quality; the main limitations were unclear risk of bias, inconsistent results for some outcomes and imprecision, due to small trials with imprecise results. We are uncertain whether double IUI improves live birth rate compared to single IUI (odds ratio (OR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 1.88; I2 = 29%; studies = 3, participants = 468; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that if the chance of live birth following single IUI is 16%, the chance of live birth following double IUI would be between 12% and 27%. Performing a sensitivity analysis restricted to only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with low risk of selection bias showed similar results. We are uncertain whether double IUI reduces miscarriage rate compared to single IUI (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.98 to 3.24; I2 = 0%; studies = 6, participants = 2363; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that chance of miscarriage following single IUI is 1.5% and the chance following double IUI would be between 1.5% and 5%. The reported clinical pregnancy rate per woman randomised may increase with double IUI group (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.86; I2 = 34%; studies = 9, participants = 2716; low quality evidence). This result should be interpreted with caution due to the low quality of the evidence and the moderate inconsistency. The evidence suggests that the chance of a pregnancy following single IUI is 14% and the chance following double IUI would be between 16% and 23%. We are uncertain whether double IUI affects multiple pregnancy rate compared to single IUI (OR 2.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 4.56; I2 = 8%; studies = 5; participants = 2203; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that chance of multiple pregnancy following single IUI is 0.7% and the chance following double IUI would be between 0.85% and 3.7%. We are uncertain whether double IUI has an effect on ectopic pregnancy rate compared to single IUI (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.28; I2 = 0%; studies = 4, participants = 1048; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that the chance of an ectopic pregnancy following single IUI is 0.8% and the chance following double IUI would be between 0.3% and 3.2%.

Authors' conclusions: Our main analysis, of which the evidence is low quality, shows that we are uncertain if double IUI improves live birth and reduces miscarriage compared to single IUI. Our sensitivity analysis restricted to studies of low risk of selection bias for both outcomes is consistent with the main analysis. Clinical pregnancy rate may increase in the double IUI group, but this should be interpreted with caution due to the low quality evidence. We are uncertain whether double IUI has an effect on multiple pregnancy rate and ectopic pregnancy rate compared to single IUI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

低生育能力夫妇在刺激周期中进行双次与单次宫内人工授精。
背景:在不孕不育夫妇中,尝试怀孕至少一年的夫妇,子宫内人工授精(IUI)结合卵巢过度刺激(OH)是可以提供的治疗方式之一。当进行人工授精时,在同一周期内进行第二次人工授精可能会增加受孕的机会。在2010年该综述的上一次更新中显示,与单次IUI相比,双次IUI会增加妊娠率。自2010年以来,不同的临床试验发表了关于双IUI是否比单IUI增加妊娠率的不同结论。目的:探讨双腔人工授精(IUI)与单腔人工授精(IUI)对低生育能力夫妇的有效性和安全性。检索方法:我们于2020年7月检索了Cochrane妇科与生育(CGF)组试验注册库、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL,并于2021年2月检索了LILACS、Google scholar和Epistemonikos,同时进行了参考资料检查并联系了研究作者和该领域的专家,以确定其他研究。选择标准:我们纳入了不孕夫妇在刺激周期中双人工授精和单人工授精的随机对照平行试验。数据收集和分析:两位作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。我们联系了研究作者以获取更多信息。主要结果:我们在9项涉及不孕妇女的研究中发现。证据的质量很低;主要的限制是不明确的偏倚风险,一些结果不一致,以及由于小规模试验结果不精确而导致的不精确。我们不确定与单次IUI相比,双次IUI是否能提高活产率(优势比(OR) 1.15, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.71至1.88;I2 = 29%;研究= 3,参与者= 468;证据质量低)。有证据表明,如果单次人工授精后的活产几率为16%,那么两次人工授精后的活产几率将在12%至27%之间。灵敏度分析仅限于低选择偏倚风险的随机对照试验(rct),结果相似。我们不确定与单次IUI相比,双次IUI是否能降低流产率(OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.98 - 3.24;I2 = 0%;研究= 6,参与者= 2363;证据质量低)。有证据表明,单次人工授精后流产的几率为1.5%,两次人工授精后流产的几率在1.5%至5%之间。双IUI组报告的每名随机妇女的临床妊娠率可能增加(OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.23至1.86;I2 = 34%;研究= 9,参与者= 2716;证据质量低)。由于证据质量较低和不一致程度适中,应谨慎解释这一结果。有证据表明,单次人工授精后怀孕的几率为14%,两次人工授精后怀孕的几率在16%到23%之间。我们不确定与单次IUI相比,双次IUI是否会影响多胎妊娠率(OR 2.04, 95% CI 0.91 ~ 4.56;I2 = 8%;研究= 5;受试者= 2203人;证据质量低)。有证据表明,单次人工授精后多胎妊娠的几率为0.7%,两次人工授精后多胎妊娠的几率为0.85% ~ 3.7%。我们不确定与单次IUI相比,双次IUI是否对异位妊娠率有影响(OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.35 ~ 4.28;I2 = 0%;研究= 4,参与者= 1048;证据质量低)。有证据表明,单次人工授精后异位妊娠的几率为0.8%,两次人工授精后异位妊娠的几率在0.3%至3.2%之间。作者的结论:我们的主要分析证据质量较低,表明我们不确定与单次IUI相比,两次IUI是否能提高活产率并减少流产。我们的敏感性分析仅限于低选择偏倚风险的研究,这两个结果与主要分析一致。双IUI组临床妊娠率可能增加,但由于证据质量低,应谨慎解释。我们不确定与单次IUI相比,双次IUI是否对多胎妊娠率和异位妊娠率有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信