Harmful Choices, the Case of C, and Decision-Making Competence.

Neil Pickering, GIles Newton-Howes, Greg Young
{"title":"Harmful Choices, the Case of C, and Decision-Making Competence.","authors":"Neil Pickering,&nbsp;GIles Newton-Howes,&nbsp;Greg Young","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2021.1941422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we make the case that a person who is considering or has already made a decision that appears seriously harmful to that person should in some cases be judged incapable of making that decision <i>because of the harmfulness of the decision</i>. We focus on the English case of C of 2015. C refused life-saving dialysis. The hospital wanted her declared incompetent to make this decision under the English Mental Capacity Act of 2005. The Judge argued that the consequences for a person's welfare of their decision are irrelevant to the assessment of competence, a position labeled \"internalism.\" This aligns with an assessment of decision-making competence on a strictly cognitivist model. However, internalism misrepresents decision-making. The outcomes of decision-making processes should be part and parcel of judgments of decision-making competence, and in some cases are necessary for any judgment of incompetence to be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":145777,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB","volume":" ","pages":"38-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15265161.2021.1941422","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1941422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

In this paper, we make the case that a person who is considering or has already made a decision that appears seriously harmful to that person should in some cases be judged incapable of making that decision because of the harmfulness of the decision. We focus on the English case of C of 2015. C refused life-saving dialysis. The hospital wanted her declared incompetent to make this decision under the English Mental Capacity Act of 2005. The Judge argued that the consequences for a person's welfare of their decision are irrelevant to the assessment of competence, a position labeled "internalism." This aligns with an assessment of decision-making competence on a strictly cognitivist model. However, internalism misrepresents decision-making. The outcomes of decision-making processes should be part and parcel of judgments of decision-making competence, and in some cases are necessary for any judgment of incompetence to be made.

有害选择、C案例与决策能力。
在本文中,我们认为,一个人正在考虑或已经做出了一个似乎对自己严重有害的决定,在某些情况下,由于该决定的危害性,应该被判定为没有能力做出该决定。我们关注的是2015年C的英文案例。C拒绝了挽救生命的透析。医院希望根据2005年《英国精神能力法》宣布她没有能力做出这个决定。法官认为,一个人的决定对其福利的影响与能力的评估无关,这一立场被称为“内部主义”。这与严格的认知主义模型对决策能力的评估是一致的。然而,内部主义曲解了决策。决策过程的结果应该是判断决策能力的重要组成部分,在某些情况下,对于判断是否无能也是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信