Randomized Controlled Trials of Mindfulness and Acceptance-Based Interventions Over the Past Two Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Yan Ma, Kristen M Kraemer, Jiaxuan Lyu, Gloria Y Yeh
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trials of Mindfulness and Acceptance-Based Interventions Over the Past Two Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis.","authors":"Yan Ma,&nbsp;Kristen M Kraemer,&nbsp;Jiaxuan Lyu,&nbsp;Gloria Y Yeh","doi":"10.1089/acm.2020.0548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The past several years have witnessed a significant increase in interest among the public in mindfulness with an unmistakable growth in the scientific literature investigating mindfulness-based therapies. A myriad of therapeutic uses of mindfulness have been studied. Given this burgeoning interest, the authors' objective was to conduct a broad-sweeping bibliometric analysis over the past two decades to describe overarching trends in the publications of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating mindfulness to broadly identify both strengths and gaps in this field and inform a strategic plan for further advancing this research area. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> The authors retrieved mindfulness-focused RCTs available on PubMed in the past two decades (2000-2019). They synthesized the literature with respect to publication numbers, countries of publication, journal type, areas of research focus, characteristics of study designs, sample size, and trends in remote intervention delivery. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The resulting 1389 publications represent a near exponential growth trend over the past 20 years. Publications from the top three countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands) with the highest productivity accounted for 60% of total number of publications. The most published modalities include acceptance-based therapy (<i>n</i> = 260), mindfulness-based stress reduction (<i>n</i> = 238), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (<i>n</i> = 174), and dialectical behavior therapy (<i>n</i> = 82). Stress, depression, anxiety, pain, cancer, diet/healthy eating, and sleep were the most common major areas of focus. Studies included active (46%) or inactive controls (44%), and increasingly more studies with both types of controls (10%). The top 10 journals that published the most mindfulness RCTs were from behavioral sciences and psychiatry or psychology. There were 187 RCTs utilizing remote delivery, with 146 (87.1%) in the most recent 5 years. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Publications of mindfulness-focused RCTs show a continuous increasing trend. Mindfulness research from non-Western countries and studies published in biomedical journals were less prevalent and potentially represent future opportunities. Trends of studies with both inactive and active controls support an overall advancement in research methodology. There has been a significant expansion of studies of remotely delivered mindfulness interventions. Future research might consider evaluation of a broader range of modalities and further examine optimal delivery formats.</p>","PeriodicalId":14944,"journal":{"name":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine","volume":"27 11","pages":"930-939"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917889/pdf/acm.2020.0548.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction: The past several years have witnessed a significant increase in interest among the public in mindfulness with an unmistakable growth in the scientific literature investigating mindfulness-based therapies. A myriad of therapeutic uses of mindfulness have been studied. Given this burgeoning interest, the authors' objective was to conduct a broad-sweeping bibliometric analysis over the past two decades to describe overarching trends in the publications of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating mindfulness to broadly identify both strengths and gaps in this field and inform a strategic plan for further advancing this research area. Materials and Methods: The authors retrieved mindfulness-focused RCTs available on PubMed in the past two decades (2000-2019). They synthesized the literature with respect to publication numbers, countries of publication, journal type, areas of research focus, characteristics of study designs, sample size, and trends in remote intervention delivery. Results: The resulting 1389 publications represent a near exponential growth trend over the past 20 years. Publications from the top three countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands) with the highest productivity accounted for 60% of total number of publications. The most published modalities include acceptance-based therapy (n = 260), mindfulness-based stress reduction (n = 238), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (n = 174), and dialectical behavior therapy (n = 82). Stress, depression, anxiety, pain, cancer, diet/healthy eating, and sleep were the most common major areas of focus. Studies included active (46%) or inactive controls (44%), and increasingly more studies with both types of controls (10%). The top 10 journals that published the most mindfulness RCTs were from behavioral sciences and psychiatry or psychology. There were 187 RCTs utilizing remote delivery, with 146 (87.1%) in the most recent 5 years. Conclusion: Publications of mindfulness-focused RCTs show a continuous increasing trend. Mindfulness research from non-Western countries and studies published in biomedical journals were less prevalent and potentially represent future opportunities. Trends of studies with both inactive and active controls support an overall advancement in research methodology. There has been a significant expansion of studies of remotely delivered mindfulness interventions. Future research might consider evaluation of a broader range of modalities and further examine optimal delivery formats.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在过去的二十年中,正念和接受干预的随机对照试验:文献计量学分析。
引言:在过去的几年里,公众对正念的兴趣显著增加,研究正念疗法的科学文献也有了明显的增长。人们研究了正念的无数治疗用途。鉴于这一新兴的兴趣,作者的目标是在过去二十年中进行广泛的文献计量分析,以描述调查正念的随机对照试验(rct)出版物的总体趋势,以广泛地确定该领域的优势和差距,并为进一步推进这一研究领域提供战略计划。材料和方法:作者检索了过去20年(2000-2019年)PubMed上以正念为重点的随机对照试验。他们综合了有关出版物数量、出版国家、期刊类型、研究重点领域、研究设计特征、样本量和远程干预交付趋势的文献。结果:1389篇论文在近20年呈指数增长趋势。生产率最高的前三个国家(美国、英国和荷兰)的出版物占出版物总数的60%。发表最多的治疗方式包括基于接受的治疗(n = 260)、基于正念的减压治疗(n = 238)、基于正念的认知治疗(n = 174)和辩证行为治疗(n = 82)。压力、抑郁、焦虑、疼痛、癌症、饮食/健康饮食和睡眠是最常见的主要关注领域。研究包括积极(46%)或不积极(44%)的对照,以及越来越多的两种对照(10%)的研究。发表最多正念随机对照试验的前十大期刊来自行为科学、精神病学或心理学。采用远程分娩的随机对照试验187项,其中最近5年有146项(87.1%)。结论:以正念为中心的随机对照试验的出版物呈现持续增加的趋势。来自非西方国家的正念研究和发表在生物医学期刊上的研究不那么普遍,可能代表着未来的机会。非主动对照和主动对照的研究趋势支持了研究方法的全面进步。关于远程正念干预的研究已经有了很大的扩展。未来的研究可能会考虑评估更广泛的模式,并进一步研究最佳的交付形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of alternative and complementary medicine
Journal of alternative and complementary medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine: Paradigm, Practice, and Policy Advancing Integrative Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal providing scientific research for the evaluation and integration of complementary and alternative medicine into mainstream medical practice. The Journal delivers original research that directly impacts patient care therapies, protocols, and strategies, ultimately improving the quality of healing. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine coverage includes: -Botanical Medicine -Acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Medicine -Other Traditional Medicine Practices -Mind-Body Medicine -Nutrition and Dietary Supplements -Integrative Health / Medicine -Yoga -Ayurveda -Naturopathy -Creative Arts Therapies -Integrative Whole Systems / Whole Practices -Homeopathy -Tai Chi -Qi Gong -Massage Therapy -Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine -Integrative Cost Studies / Comparative Effectiveness -Neurostimulation -Integrative Biophysics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信