Functional Outcomes of Bilateral Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Q1 Medicine
Joints Pub Date : 2021-06-18 eCollection Date: 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1730974
Michael-Alexander Malahias, Emmanouil Brilakis, Dimitrios Chytas, Dimitrios Gerogiannis, Grigorios Avramidis, Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
{"title":"Functional Outcomes of Bilateral Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Michael-Alexander Malahias,&nbsp;Emmanouil Brilakis,&nbsp;Dimitrios Chytas,&nbsp;Dimitrios Gerogiannis,&nbsp;Grigorios Avramidis,&nbsp;Emmanouil Antonogiannakis","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1730974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  To answer the question whether bilateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a safe and effective treatment which results in satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes with low complications rates. A second question to be answered was: what is the quality of the evidence of the already published studies which investigate the use of bilateral RTSA? <b>Methods</b>  Two reviewers independently conducted a systematic search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. These databases were queried with the terms \"reverse\" AND \"total\" AND \"shoulder\" AND \"arthroplasty\" AND \"clinical.\" Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. <b>Results</b>  From the 394 initial studies we finally selected and assessed 6 clinical studies which were eligible to our inclusion-exclusion criteria. The aforementioned studies included in total 203 patients (69% females; mean age range: 67.1-75 years; mean follow-up range: 12-61 months). From those, 168 patients underwent staged bilateral RTSA (mean duration between first and second operation range: 8-21.6 months) and the rest of them a unilateral RTSA as controlled treatment. Almost all mean clinical and functional scores, which were used to assess the therapeutic value of bilateral RTSA, depicted significant postoperative improvement in comparison with the mean preoperative values. The modified Coleman methodology score, which was used to assess the quality of the studies, ranged from a minimum of 36/100 to a maximum of 55/100. <b>Conclusion</b>  Despite the lack of high-quality evidence, staged bilateral RTSA seems to be a safe and effective procedure for patients with cuff tear arthropathy, which results in significantly improved clinical and functional outcomes and low reoperations' rates. <b>Level of Evidence</b>  Systematic review of level III-IV therapeutic studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1730974","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joints","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose  To answer the question whether bilateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a safe and effective treatment which results in satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes with low complications rates. A second question to be answered was: what is the quality of the evidence of the already published studies which investigate the use of bilateral RTSA? Methods  Two reviewers independently conducted a systematic search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. These databases were queried with the terms "reverse" AND "total" AND "shoulder" AND "arthroplasty" AND "clinical." Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results  From the 394 initial studies we finally selected and assessed 6 clinical studies which were eligible to our inclusion-exclusion criteria. The aforementioned studies included in total 203 patients (69% females; mean age range: 67.1-75 years; mean follow-up range: 12-61 months). From those, 168 patients underwent staged bilateral RTSA (mean duration between first and second operation range: 8-21.6 months) and the rest of them a unilateral RTSA as controlled treatment. Almost all mean clinical and functional scores, which were used to assess the therapeutic value of bilateral RTSA, depicted significant postoperative improvement in comparison with the mean preoperative values. The modified Coleman methodology score, which was used to assess the quality of the studies, ranged from a minimum of 36/100 to a maximum of 55/100. Conclusion  Despite the lack of high-quality evidence, staged bilateral RTSA seems to be a safe and effective procedure for patients with cuff tear arthropathy, which results in significantly improved clinical and functional outcomes and low reoperations' rates. Level of Evidence  Systematic review of level III-IV therapeutic studies.

双侧逆行全肩关节置换术的功能结果:系统回顾。
目的探讨双侧逆行全肩关节置换术(RTSA)是否是一种安全有效、临床和功能满意、并发症发生率低的治疗方法。第二个要回答的问题是:已经发表的调查双侧RTSA使用的研究的证据质量如何?方法两位审稿人分别使用MEDLINE/PubMed数据库和Cochrane系统评价数据库,根据系统评价和meta分析的首选报告项目进行系统检索。这些数据库用“反向”、“全”、“肩关节”、“关节成形术”和“临床”等术语进行查询。采用描述性统计对数据进行汇总。结果从394项初始研究中,我们最终选择并评估了6项符合纳入-排除标准的临床研究。上述研究共纳入203例患者(69%为女性;平均年龄67.1-75岁;平均随访时间:12-61个月)。其中,168例患者接受分阶段双侧RTSA(第一次和第二次手术的平均持续时间:8-21.6个月),其余患者接受单侧RTSA作为对照治疗。几乎所有用于评估双侧RTSA治疗价值的平均临床和功能评分都显示,与术前平均评分相比,术后有显著改善。用于评估研究质量的改良Coleman方法评分范围从最低36/100到最高55/100。结论尽管缺乏高质量的证据,但分阶段双侧RTSA似乎是一种安全有效的治疗袖带撕裂性关节病的方法,可显著改善临床和功能预后,降低再手术率。III-IV级治疗性研究的系统评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Joints
Joints Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Joints is the official publication of SIGASCOT (Italian Society of the Knee, Arthroscopy, Sports Traumatology, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technology). As an Open Acccess journal, it publishes papers on clinical and basic research, review articles, technical notes, case reports, and editorials about the latest developments in knee surgery, arthroscopy, sports traumatology, cartilage, orthopaedic technology, upper limb, and related rehabilitation. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal''s content are always welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信