Human-derived acellular dermal matrix may be an alternative to autologous grafts in tympanic membrane reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2
Shan Xu, Xia Sun, Ning Yang, Aihui Yan
{"title":"Human-derived acellular dermal matrix may be an alternative to autologous grafts in tympanic membrane reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shan Xu, Xia Sun, Ning Yang, Aihui Yan","doi":"10.1186/s40463-021-00518-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human-derived acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been widely used as an effective alternative to autologous grafts in tympanoplasty. However, evidence of ADM as an alternative to autologous grafts in the repair of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation still lacks adequate empirical evidence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the clinical safety and efficacy of human-derived ADM as TM graft material for tympanoplasty.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science databases and reference lists of the retrieved articles were searched, with no language restriction.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>All randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies that compared the use of human-derived ADM and autologous grafts in tympanoplasty for TM perforation were included.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias in the included studies and extracted data. The pooled results for continuous data were reported as a mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). For dichotomous data, odds risk (OR) with 95% CI was used. ChI<sup>2</sup> statistic and Galbraith plots were used to assess the heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed with a funnel plot and Egger's test.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Five retrospective cohort studies and four randomized controlled studies with a total of 610 participants were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences in graft success (OR: 0.71 [0.39, 1.29], p = 0.26), air-bone gap (ABG) reduction (MD: - 0.59 [- 3.81, 1.19], p = 0.51), or complications (OR: 1.23 [0.07, 20.64], p = 0.89) were found between the ADM group and autologous graft group. The use of ADM significantly shortened tympanoplasty surgery time (MD: - 16.14 [- 21.22, - 11.07], p < 0.00001) and reduced postoperative pain (MD: - 2.57 [- 3.57, - 1.58], p < 0.00001) compared with the autologous graft group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Human-derived ADM might be an effective alternative to autologous grafts for tympanoplasty. However, some of the studies that were included in the present meta-analysis had rather low methodological quality, and more adequately designed clinical trials should be performed in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":520683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","volume":" ","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8261972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00518-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Human-derived acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been widely used as an effective alternative to autologous grafts in tympanoplasty. However, evidence of ADM as an alternative to autologous grafts in the repair of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation still lacks adequate empirical evidence.

Objectives: To determine the clinical safety and efficacy of human-derived ADM as TM graft material for tympanoplasty.

Data sources: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science databases and reference lists of the retrieved articles were searched, with no language restriction.

Selection criteria: All randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies that compared the use of human-derived ADM and autologous grafts in tympanoplasty for TM perforation were included.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias in the included studies and extracted data. The pooled results for continuous data were reported as a mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). For dichotomous data, odds risk (OR) with 95% CI was used. ChI2 statistic and Galbraith plots were used to assess the heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed with a funnel plot and Egger's test.

Main results: Five retrospective cohort studies and four randomized controlled studies with a total of 610 participants were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences in graft success (OR: 0.71 [0.39, 1.29], p = 0.26), air-bone gap (ABG) reduction (MD: - 0.59 [- 3.81, 1.19], p = 0.51), or complications (OR: 1.23 [0.07, 20.64], p = 0.89) were found between the ADM group and autologous graft group. The use of ADM significantly shortened tympanoplasty surgery time (MD: - 16.14 [- 21.22, - 11.07], p < 0.00001) and reduced postoperative pain (MD: - 2.57 [- 3.57, - 1.58], p < 0.00001) compared with the autologous graft group.

Conclusion: Human-derived ADM might be an effective alternative to autologous grafts for tympanoplasty. However, some of the studies that were included in the present meta-analysis had rather low methodological quality, and more adequately designed clinical trials should be performed in the future.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人源性脱细胞真皮基质可能是鼓膜重建中自体移植物的替代选择:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:人源性脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)已被广泛应用于鼓室成形术中,作为自体移植物的有效替代。然而,ADM作为一种替代自体移植物修复鼓膜穿孔的证据仍然缺乏足够的经验证据。目的:探讨人源性ADM作为鼓室成形术移植材料的临床安全性和有效性。数据来源:检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、EBSCO、Ovid、Scopus、Web of Science数据库,检索文献参考文献列表,无语言限制。选择标准:所有比较人源性ADM和自体移植物在鼓室成形术中治疗TM穿孔的随机对照试验和回顾性队列研究被纳入。数据收集和分析:两位综述作者独立评估纳入研究的偏倚风险和提取的数据。连续数据的合并结果以平均差(MD)和95%置信区间(CI)报告。对于二分类数据,使用95% CI的odds risk (OR)。采用ChI2统计量和Galbraith图评估异质性。采用漏斗图和Egger检验评估发表偏倚。主要结果:meta分析纳入5项回顾性队列研究和4项随机对照研究,共纳入610名受试者。在移植成功率(OR: 0.71 [0.39, 1.29], p = 0.26)、气骨间隙(ABG)减少(MD: - 0.59 [- 3.81, 1.19], p = 0.51)、并发症(OR: 1.23 [0.07, 20.64], p = 0.89)方面,ADM组与自体移植物组无显著差异。使用ADM可显著缩短鼓室成形术时间(MD: - 16.14[- 21.22, - 11.07])。结论:人源ADM可能是替代自体鼓室成形术的有效选择。然而,本荟萃分析中纳入的一些研究的方法学质量相当低,未来应进行更充分设计的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书