Comparison of student satisfaction, perceived learning and outcome performance.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Steven L Taliaferro, Beverly L Harger
{"title":"Comparison of student satisfaction, perceived learning and outcome performance.","authors":"Steven L Taliaferro,&nbsp;Beverly L Harger","doi":"10.7899/JCE-19-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to investigate whether blended online with laboratory instruction differs from traditional classroom lecture and laboratory with regard to student satisfaction and performance in a radiographic technique class teaching radiation health and physics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following institutional review board approval, 122 participants were randomly assigned to either an online or classroom environment for the lecture portion of the course. All participants attended weekly laboratory sessions in person. Anonymous surveys given during midterm and final exams assessed satisfaction with learning experience and expected grades. Linear models assessing differences between groups were adjusted for age, gender, prior online class experience, online class preference, self-reported computer skill, and time of year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students in the blended cohort reported overall greater satisfaction (p < .03) and found the delivery method more enjoyable (p < .002) than did the traditional classroom cohort. No differences in exam scores between groups were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that a blended format of instruction can improve learner satisfaction as compared with the traditional classroom method. Blended instruction implemented into a traditional educational program helps students balance schedules, has a positive impact on perceived learning, and provides exam success similar to that of the traditional classroom.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"36 1","pages":"22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895843/pdf/i2374-250X-36-1-22.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-19-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate whether blended online with laboratory instruction differs from traditional classroom lecture and laboratory with regard to student satisfaction and performance in a radiographic technique class teaching radiation health and physics.

Methods: Following institutional review board approval, 122 participants were randomly assigned to either an online or classroom environment for the lecture portion of the course. All participants attended weekly laboratory sessions in person. Anonymous surveys given during midterm and final exams assessed satisfaction with learning experience and expected grades. Linear models assessing differences between groups were adjusted for age, gender, prior online class experience, online class preference, self-reported computer skill, and time of year.

Results: Students in the blended cohort reported overall greater satisfaction (p < .03) and found the delivery method more enjoyable (p < .002) than did the traditional classroom cohort. No differences in exam scores between groups were observed.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a blended format of instruction can improve learner satisfaction as compared with the traditional classroom method. Blended instruction implemented into a traditional educational program helps students balance schedules, has a positive impact on perceived learning, and provides exam success similar to that of the traditional classroom.

Abstract Image

学生满意度、感知学习与结果表现之比较。
摘要目的:探讨放射技术课放射健康与物理教学中,在线结合实验教学与传统课堂授课和实验室教学在学生满意度和表现方面的差异。方法:经机构审查委员会批准,122名参与者被随机分配到在线或课堂环境中进行课程的讲座部分。所有的参与者都亲自参加了每周一次的实验室会议。在期中和期末考试期间进行的匿名调查评估了对学习经历的满意度和预期成绩。评估组间差异的线性模型根据年龄、性别、先前的在线课程经验、在线课程偏好、自我报告的计算机技能和一年中的时间进行了调整。结果:混合队列中的学生报告了总体上更高的满意度(p < .03),并且发现交付方法比传统课堂队列更令人愉快(p < .002)。各组之间的考试成绩没有差异。结论:本研究表明,与传统的课堂教学方法相比,混合教学形式可以提高学习者的满意度。在传统教育项目中实施混合教学有助于学生平衡课程表,对感知学习产生积极影响,并提供与传统课堂类似的考试成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信