Sunlight for the prevention and treatment of hyperbilirubinemia in term and late preterm neonates.

Delia Horn, Danielle Ehret, Kanekal S Gautham, Roger Soll
{"title":"Sunlight for the prevention and treatment of hyperbilirubinemia in term and late preterm neonates.","authors":"Delia Horn,&nbsp;Danielle Ehret,&nbsp;Kanekal S Gautham,&nbsp;Roger Soll","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD013277.pub2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute bilirubin encephalopathy (ABE) and the other serious complications of severe hyperbilirubinemia in the neonate occur far more frequently in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This is due to several factors that place babies in LMIC at greater risk for hyperbilirubinemia, including increased prevalence of hematologic disorders leading to hemolysis, increased sepsis, less prenatal or postnatal care, and a lack of resources to treat jaundiced babies. Hospitals and clinics face frequent shortages of functioning phototherapy machines and inconsistent access to electricity to run the machines. Sunlight has the potential to treat hyperbilirubinemia: it contains the wavelengths of light that are produced by phototherapy machines. However, it contains harmful ultraviolet light and infrared radiation, and prolonged exposure has the potential to lead to sunburn, skin damage, and hyperthermia or hypothermia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of sunlight administered alone or with filtering or amplifying devices for the prevention and treatment of clinical jaundice or laboratory-diagnosed hyperbilirubinemia in term and late preterm neonates.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search CENTRAL (2019, Issue 5), MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL on 2 May 2019. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster RCTs. We updated the searches on 1 June 2020.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included RCTs, quasi-RCTs, and cluster RCTs. We excluded crossover RCTs. Included studies must have evaluated sunlight (with or without filters or amplification) for the prevention and treatment of hyperbilirubinemia or jaundice in term or late preterm neonates. Neonates must have been enrolled in the study by one-week postnatal age.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We used standard methodologic procedures expected by Cochrane. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Our primary outcomes were: use of conventional phototherapy, treatment failure requiring exchange transfusion, ABE, chronic bilirubin encephalopathy, and death.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included three RCTs (1103 infants). All three studies had small sample sizes, were unblinded, and were at high risk of bias. We planned to undertake four comparisons, but only found studies reporting on two. Sunlight with or without filters or amplification compared to no treatment for the prevention and treatment of hyperbilirubinemia in term and late preterm neonates One study of twice-daily sunlight exposure (30 to 60 minutes) compared to no treatment reported the incidence of jaundice may be reduced (risk ratio [RR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.82; risk difference [RD] -0.14, 95% CI -0.22 to -0.06; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome [NNTB] 7, 95% CI 5 to 17; 1 study, 482 infants; very low-certainty evidence) and the number of days that an infant was jaundiced may be reduced (mean difference [MD] -2.20 days, 95% CI -2.60 to -1.80; 1 study, 482 infants; very low-certainty evidence). There were no data on safety or potential harmful effects of the intervention. The study did not assess use of conventional phototherapy, treatment failure requiring exchange transfusion, ABE, and long-term consequences of hyperbilirubinemia. The study showed that sunlight therapy may reduce rehospitalization rates within seven days of discharge for treatment for hyperbilirubinemia, but the evidence was very uncertain (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.11; RD -0.04, -0.08 to 0.01; 1 study, 482 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Sunlight with or without filters or amplification compared to other sources of phototherapy for the treatment of hyperbilirubinemia in infants with confirmed hyperbilirubinemia Two studies (621 infants) compared the effect of filtered-sunlight exposure to other sources of phototherapy in infants with confirmed hyperbilirubinemia. Filtered-sunlight phototherapy (FSPT) and conventional or intensive electric phototherapy led to a similar number of days of effective treatment (broadly defined as a minimal increase of total serum bilirubin in infants less than 72 hours old and a decrease in total serum bilirubin in infants more than 72 hours old on any day that at least four to five hours of sunlight therapy was available). There may be little or no difference in treatment failure requiring exchange transfusion (typical RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.73; typical RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01; 2 studies, 621 infants; low-certainty evidence). One study reported ABE, and no infants developed this outcome (RR not estimable; RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02; 1 study, 174 infants; low-certainty evidence). One study reported death as a reason for study withdrawal; no infants were withdrawn due to death (RR not estimable; typical RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01; 1 study, 447 infants; low-certainty evidence). Neither study assessed long-term outcomes. Possible harms: both studies showed a probable increased risk for hyperthermia (body temperature greater than 37.5 °C) with FSPT (typical RR 4.39, 95% CI 2.98 to 6.47; typical RD 0.30, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.36; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome [NNTH] 3, 95% CI 2 to 4; 2 studies, 621 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was probably no difference in hypothermia (body temperature less than 35.5 °C) (typical RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.03; typical RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.04; 2 studies, 621 infants; moderate-certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>Sunlight may be an effective adjunct to conventional phototherapy in LMIC settings, may allow for rotational use of limited phototherapy machines, and may be preferable to families as it can allow for increased bonding. Filtration of sunlight to block harmful ultraviolet light and frequent temperature checks for babies under sunlight may be warranted for safety. Sunlight may be effective in preventing hyperbilirubinemia in some cases, but these studies have not demonstrated that sunlight alone is effective for the treatment of hyperbilirubinemia given its sporadic availability and the low or very low certainty of the evidence in these studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":515753,"journal":{"name":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews","volume":" ","pages":"CD013277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/14651858.CD013277.pub2","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013277.pub2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Acute bilirubin encephalopathy (ABE) and the other serious complications of severe hyperbilirubinemia in the neonate occur far more frequently in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This is due to several factors that place babies in LMIC at greater risk for hyperbilirubinemia, including increased prevalence of hematologic disorders leading to hemolysis, increased sepsis, less prenatal or postnatal care, and a lack of resources to treat jaundiced babies. Hospitals and clinics face frequent shortages of functioning phototherapy machines and inconsistent access to electricity to run the machines. Sunlight has the potential to treat hyperbilirubinemia: it contains the wavelengths of light that are produced by phototherapy machines. However, it contains harmful ultraviolet light and infrared radiation, and prolonged exposure has the potential to lead to sunburn, skin damage, and hyperthermia or hypothermia.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of sunlight administered alone or with filtering or amplifying devices for the prevention and treatment of clinical jaundice or laboratory-diagnosed hyperbilirubinemia in term and late preterm neonates.

Search methods: We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search CENTRAL (2019, Issue 5), MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL on 2 May 2019. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster RCTs. We updated the searches on 1 June 2020.

Selection criteria: We included RCTs, quasi-RCTs, and cluster RCTs. We excluded crossover RCTs. Included studies must have evaluated sunlight (with or without filters or amplification) for the prevention and treatment of hyperbilirubinemia or jaundice in term or late preterm neonates. Neonates must have been enrolled in the study by one-week postnatal age.

Data collection and analysis: We used standard methodologic procedures expected by Cochrane. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Our primary outcomes were: use of conventional phototherapy, treatment failure requiring exchange transfusion, ABE, chronic bilirubin encephalopathy, and death.

Main results: We included three RCTs (1103 infants). All three studies had small sample sizes, were unblinded, and were at high risk of bias. We planned to undertake four comparisons, but only found studies reporting on two. Sunlight with or without filters or amplification compared to no treatment for the prevention and treatment of hyperbilirubinemia in term and late preterm neonates One study of twice-daily sunlight exposure (30 to 60 minutes) compared to no treatment reported the incidence of jaundice may be reduced (risk ratio [RR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.82; risk difference [RD] -0.14, 95% CI -0.22 to -0.06; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome [NNTB] 7, 95% CI 5 to 17; 1 study, 482 infants; very low-certainty evidence) and the number of days that an infant was jaundiced may be reduced (mean difference [MD] -2.20 days, 95% CI -2.60 to -1.80; 1 study, 482 infants; very low-certainty evidence). There were no data on safety or potential harmful effects of the intervention. The study did not assess use of conventional phototherapy, treatment failure requiring exchange transfusion, ABE, and long-term consequences of hyperbilirubinemia. The study showed that sunlight therapy may reduce rehospitalization rates within seven days of discharge for treatment for hyperbilirubinemia, but the evidence was very uncertain (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.11; RD -0.04, -0.08 to 0.01; 1 study, 482 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Sunlight with or without filters or amplification compared to other sources of phototherapy for the treatment of hyperbilirubinemia in infants with confirmed hyperbilirubinemia Two studies (621 infants) compared the effect of filtered-sunlight exposure to other sources of phototherapy in infants with confirmed hyperbilirubinemia. Filtered-sunlight phototherapy (FSPT) and conventional or intensive electric phototherapy led to a similar number of days of effective treatment (broadly defined as a minimal increase of total serum bilirubin in infants less than 72 hours old and a decrease in total serum bilirubin in infants more than 72 hours old on any day that at least four to five hours of sunlight therapy was available). There may be little or no difference in treatment failure requiring exchange transfusion (typical RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.73; typical RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01; 2 studies, 621 infants; low-certainty evidence). One study reported ABE, and no infants developed this outcome (RR not estimable; RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02; 1 study, 174 infants; low-certainty evidence). One study reported death as a reason for study withdrawal; no infants were withdrawn due to death (RR not estimable; typical RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01; 1 study, 447 infants; low-certainty evidence). Neither study assessed long-term outcomes. Possible harms: both studies showed a probable increased risk for hyperthermia (body temperature greater than 37.5 °C) with FSPT (typical RR 4.39, 95% CI 2.98 to 6.47; typical RD 0.30, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.36; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome [NNTH] 3, 95% CI 2 to 4; 2 studies, 621 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was probably no difference in hypothermia (body temperature less than 35.5 °C) (typical RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.03; typical RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.04; 2 studies, 621 infants; moderate-certainty evidence).

Authors' conclusions: Sunlight may be an effective adjunct to conventional phototherapy in LMIC settings, may allow for rotational use of limited phototherapy machines, and may be preferable to families as it can allow for increased bonding. Filtration of sunlight to block harmful ultraviolet light and frequent temperature checks for babies under sunlight may be warranted for safety. Sunlight may be effective in preventing hyperbilirubinemia in some cases, but these studies have not demonstrated that sunlight alone is effective for the treatment of hyperbilirubinemia given its sporadic availability and the low or very low certainty of the evidence in these studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

阳光对足月和晚期早产儿高胆红素血症的预防和治疗。
背景:新生儿急性胆红素脑病(ABE)和其他严重高胆红素血症的严重并发症在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)更为常见。这是由于几个因素使低收入和中等收入国家的婴儿患高胆红素血症的风险更高,包括导致溶血的血液系统疾病的患病率增加,败血症的增加,产前或产后护理的减少,以及缺乏治疗黄疸婴儿的资源。医院和诊所经常面临运转正常的光疗设备短缺和设备供电不稳定的问题。阳光有治疗高胆红素血症的潜力:它包含由光疗机器产生的光的波长。然而,它含有有害的紫外线和红外线辐射,长时间接触有可能导致晒伤、皮肤损伤和体温过高或过低。目的:评价日光单独照射或配合过滤或放大装置照射预防和治疗足月和晚期早产儿临床黄疸或实验室诊断的高胆红素血症的疗效。检索方法:我们使用Cochrane Neonatal的标准检索策略,于2019年5月2日检索CENTRAL(2019,第5期)、MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL。我们还检索了临床试验数据库、会议记录以及随机对照试验(rct)、准rct和集群rct的检索文章参考列表。我们在2020年6月1日更新了搜索结果。选择标准:纳入随机对照试验、准随机对照试验和集群随机对照试验。我们排除了交叉随机对照试验。纳入的研究必须评估阳光(带或不带滤镜或放大)对预防和治疗足月或晚期早产儿高胆红素血症或黄疸的作用。新生儿必须在出生后一周内被纳入研究。资料收集和分析:我们使用Cochrane期望的标准方法程序。我们使用GRADE方法来评估证据的确定性。我们的主要结局是:使用常规光疗、治疗失败需要换血、ABE、慢性胆红素脑病和死亡。主要结果:我们纳入了3项随机对照试验(1103名婴儿)。这三项研究的样本量都很小,是非盲法的,偏倚风险很高。我们计划进行四项比较,但只发现了两项研究。一项研究表明,与未治疗相比,每天两次阳光照射(30至60分钟)与未治疗相比,黄疸的发生率可能降低(风险比[RR] 0.61, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.45至0.82;风险差异[RD] -0.14, 95% CI -0.22 ~ -0.06;获得额外有益结果所需治疗的人数[NNTB] 7, 95% CI 5 ~ 17;1项研究,482名婴儿;极低确定性证据),婴儿黄疸的天数可能会减少(平均差[MD] -2.20天,95% CI -2.60至-1.80;1项研究,482名婴儿;非常低确定性证据)。没有关于安全性或干预的潜在有害影响的数据。该研究没有评估常规光疗的使用、治疗失败需要换血、ABE和高胆红素血症的长期后果。研究显示,日光疗法可降低高胆红素血症患者出院后7天内的再住院率,但证据非常不确定(RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.27 ~ 1.11;RD -0.04, -0.08至0.01;1项研究,482名婴儿;非常低确定性证据)。两项研究(621名婴儿)比较了在确诊的高胆红素血症婴儿中,经过过滤的阳光照射与其他来源的光疗的效果。过滤阳光光疗(FSPT)和常规或强化电光疗导致相似天数的有效治疗(广义定义为在任何一天,至少4至5小时的阳光治疗可使小于72小时的婴儿的血清总胆红素增加最少,而大于72小时的婴儿的血清总胆红素减少)。治疗失败需要换血的差异可能很小或没有差异(典型RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06至15.73;典型RD为0.00,95% CI为-0.01 ~ 0.01;2项研究,621名婴儿;确定性的证据)。一项研究报告了ABE,没有婴儿出现这种结果(RR无法估计;RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.02 ~ 0.02;1项研究,174名婴儿;确定性的证据)。一项研究报告死亡是退出研究的一个原因;没有婴儿因死亡被撤下(RR不可估计;典型RD为0.00,95% CI为-0.01 ~ 0。 01;1项研究,447名婴儿;确定性的证据)。两项研究都没有评估长期结果。可能的危害:两项研究均显示FSPT可能增加高热(体温高于37.5°C)的风险(典型RR 4.39, 95% CI 2.98至6.47;典型RD 0.30, 95% CI 0.23 ~ 0.36;额外有害结果需要治疗的人数[NNTH] 3, 95% CI 2 ~ 4;2项研究,621名婴儿;moderate-certainty证据)。低体温(体温低于35.5°C)可能没有差异(典型RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55至2.03;典型RD为0.00,95% CI为-0.03 ~ 0.04;2项研究,621名婴儿;moderate-certainty证据)。作者的结论是:在低收入家庭环境中,阳光可能是传统光疗的有效辅助手段,可能允许轮流使用有限的光疗机器,并且可能更适合家庭,因为它可以增加联系。过滤阳光以阻挡有害的紫外线,并在阳光下经常检查婴儿的温度,以确保安全。在某些情况下,阳光可能对预防高胆红素血症有效,但这些研究并没有证明单独的阳光对治疗高胆红素血症是有效的,因为这些研究中的证据是零星的,而且证据的确定性很低或非常低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信