Metabolomic signatures in elite cyclists: differential characterization of a seeming normal endocrine status regarding three serum hormones.

Alain Paris, Boris Labrador, François-Xavier Lejeune, Cécile Canlet, Jérôme Molina, Michel Guinot, Armand Mégret, Michel Rieu, Jean-Christophe Thalabard, Yves Le Bouc
{"title":"Metabolomic signatures in elite cyclists: differential characterization of a seeming normal endocrine status regarding three serum hormones.","authors":"Alain Paris,&nbsp;Boris Labrador,&nbsp;François-Xavier Lejeune,&nbsp;Cécile Canlet,&nbsp;Jérôme Molina,&nbsp;Michel Guinot,&nbsp;Armand Mégret,&nbsp;Michel Rieu,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Thalabard,&nbsp;Yves Le Bouc","doi":"10.1007/s11306-021-01812-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Serum phenotyping of elite cyclists regarding cortisol, IGF1 and testosterone is a way to detect endocrine disruptions possibly explained by exercise overload, non-balanced diet or by doping. This latter disruption-driven approach is supported by fundamental physiology although without any evidence of any metabolic markers.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Serum samples were distributed through Low, High or Normal endocrine classes according to hormone concentration. A <sup>1</sup>H NMR metabolomic study of 655 serum obtained in the context of the longitudinal medical follow-up of 253 subjects was performed to discriminate the three classes for every endocrine phenotype.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An original processing algorithm was built which combined a partial-least squares-based orthogonal correction of metabolomic signals and a shrinkage discriminant analysis (SDA) to get satisfying classifications. An extended validation procedure was used to plan in larger size cohorts a minimal size to get a global prediction rate (GPR), i.e. the product of the three class prediction rates, higher than 99.9%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considering the 200 most SDA-informative variables, a sigmoidal fitting of the GPR gave estimates of a minimal sample size to 929, 2346 and 1408 for cortisol, IGF1 and testosterone, respectively. Analysis of outliers from cortisol and testosterone Normal classes outside the 97.5%-confidence limit of score prediction revealed possibly (i) an inadequate protein intake for outliers or (ii) an intake of dietary ergogenics, glycine or glutamine, which might explain the significant presence of heterogeneous metabolic profiles in a supposedly normal cyclists subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a next validation metabolomics study of a so-sized cohort, anthropological, clinical and dietary metadata should be recorded in priority at the blood collection time to confirm these functional hypotheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":144887,"journal":{"name":"Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society","volume":" ","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11306-021-01812-4","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-021-01812-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Serum phenotyping of elite cyclists regarding cortisol, IGF1 and testosterone is a way to detect endocrine disruptions possibly explained by exercise overload, non-balanced diet or by doping. This latter disruption-driven approach is supported by fundamental physiology although without any evidence of any metabolic markers.

Objectives: Serum samples were distributed through Low, High or Normal endocrine classes according to hormone concentration. A 1H NMR metabolomic study of 655 serum obtained in the context of the longitudinal medical follow-up of 253 subjects was performed to discriminate the three classes for every endocrine phenotype.

Methods: An original processing algorithm was built which combined a partial-least squares-based orthogonal correction of metabolomic signals and a shrinkage discriminant analysis (SDA) to get satisfying classifications. An extended validation procedure was used to plan in larger size cohorts a minimal size to get a global prediction rate (GPR), i.e. the product of the three class prediction rates, higher than 99.9%.

Results: Considering the 200 most SDA-informative variables, a sigmoidal fitting of the GPR gave estimates of a minimal sample size to 929, 2346 and 1408 for cortisol, IGF1 and testosterone, respectively. Analysis of outliers from cortisol and testosterone Normal classes outside the 97.5%-confidence limit of score prediction revealed possibly (i) an inadequate protein intake for outliers or (ii) an intake of dietary ergogenics, glycine or glutamine, which might explain the significant presence of heterogeneous metabolic profiles in a supposedly normal cyclists subgroup.

Conclusion: In a next validation metabolomics study of a so-sized cohort, anthropological, clinical and dietary metadata should be recorded in priority at the blood collection time to confirm these functional hypotheses.

精英自行车运动员的代谢组学特征:关于三种血清激素的看似正常的内分泌状态的差异特征。
精英自行车运动员的皮质醇、IGF1和睾酮的血清表型是检测内分泌紊乱的一种方法,可能是由运动过量、饮食不平衡或兴奋剂引起的。后一种破坏驱动的方法得到了基础生理学的支持,尽管没有任何代谢标志物的证据。目的:将血清按激素浓度分为低、高、正常三种类型。对253名受试者的纵向医学随访中获得的655份血清进行了1H NMR代谢组学研究,以区分每种内分泌表型的三种类型。方法:建立基于偏最小二乘的代谢组学信号正交校正与收缩判别分析(SDA)相结合的原始处理算法,得到满意的分类结果。采用扩展验证程序在更大的队列中规划最小规模,以获得全局预测率(GPR),即三类预测率的乘积,高于99.9%。结果:考虑到200个最具sda信息的变量,GPR的s型拟合给出了皮质醇、IGF1和睾酮的最小样本量分别为929、2346和1408。对皮质醇和睾酮正常组别的异常值进行分析,在得分预测的97.5%置信限之外,可能显示:(i)异常值的蛋白质摄入量不足,或(ii)饮食中摄入的自生物质、甘氨酸或谷氨酰胺,这可能解释了在一个被认为正常的骑自行车者亚组中显著存在异质性代谢谱。结论:在下一个验证性代谢组学研究中,在采血时应优先记录人类学、临床和饮食的元数据,以证实这些功能假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信