Efficacy of Lignocaine with Buprenorphine versus Lignocaine in the Management of Postoperative Pain after Minor Oral Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Anupam Singh, Srikanth Gadicherla, Komal Smriti, Kalyana C Pentapati
{"title":"Efficacy of Lignocaine with Buprenorphine versus Lignocaine in the Management of Postoperative Pain after Minor Oral Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Anupam Singh,&nbsp;Srikanth Gadicherla,&nbsp;Komal Smriti,&nbsp;Kalyana C Pentapati","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_316_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to review the efficacy of lignocaine with buprenorphine versus lignocaine alone in the management of postoperative pain after minor oral surgical procedures. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of use of lignocaine with buprenorphine versus lignocaine for intra-oral procedures were included by searching multiple databases. Outcomes assessed were onset of the time of anesthesia in seconds, duration of postoperative analgesia, postoperative pain (maximal follow-up), the number of rescue analgesics required, and adverse events. The search strategy yielded 167 publications for the title and abstract screening out of which only two trials were included for full-text screening. There was considerable heterogeneity among the included studies with regards to the outcomes assessed. The need for rescue analgesics was the only outcome that was included for meta-analyses. Forest plot showed that lignocaine with buprenorphine compared to lignocaine showed a significantly lower requirement of rescue analgesics (-0.22[-2.9,-1.55]). No trial reported any adverse effects. The results show that lignocaine with buprenorphine is effective in reducing the number of rescue analgesics required by the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":520674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"686-691"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/8f/JISPCD-10-686.PMC7791576.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_316_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We aimed to review the efficacy of lignocaine with buprenorphine versus lignocaine alone in the management of postoperative pain after minor oral surgical procedures. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of use of lignocaine with buprenorphine versus lignocaine for intra-oral procedures were included by searching multiple databases. Outcomes assessed were onset of the time of anesthesia in seconds, duration of postoperative analgesia, postoperative pain (maximal follow-up), the number of rescue analgesics required, and adverse events. The search strategy yielded 167 publications for the title and abstract screening out of which only two trials were included for full-text screening. There was considerable heterogeneity among the included studies with regards to the outcomes assessed. The need for rescue analgesics was the only outcome that was included for meta-analyses. Forest plot showed that lignocaine with buprenorphine compared to lignocaine showed a significantly lower requirement of rescue analgesics (-0.22[-2.9,-1.55]). No trial reported any adverse effects. The results show that lignocaine with buprenorphine is effective in reducing the number of rescue analgesics required by the patient.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利多卡因联合丁丙诺啡与利多卡因治疗口腔小手术术后疼痛的疗效:一项系统综述和meta分析。
我们的目的是回顾利多卡因联合丁丙诺啡与单独利多卡因在治疗小口腔手术术后疼痛方面的疗效。通过检索多个数据库,纳入了评估利多卡因联合丁丙诺啡与利多卡因口服手术疗效的随机对照试验。评估的结果包括麻醉开始时间(以秒为单位)、术后镇痛持续时间、术后疼痛(最大随访时间)、所需镇痛药物的数量和不良事件。搜索策略产生167篇出版物进行标题和摘要筛选,其中只有两篇试验被纳入全文筛选。纳入的研究在评估结果方面存在相当大的异质性。需要抢救止痛剂是纳入meta分析的唯一结果。森林图显示,与利多卡因相比,丁丙诺啡联合利多卡因对救援镇痛药的需求明显降低(-0.22[-2.9,-1.55])。没有试验报告任何不良反应。结果表明,利多卡因联合丁丙诺啡可有效减少患者所需的抢救镇痛药数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信