Implant Bio-mechanics for Successful Implant Therapy: A Systematic Review.

Khaled Mosfer Alzahrani
{"title":"Implant Bio-mechanics for Successful Implant Therapy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Khaled Mosfer Alzahrani","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_138_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental implants are considered the best treatment option for replacement of missing teeth due to high survival rates and diverse applications. However, not all dental implant therapies are successful and some fail due to various biological and or/mechanical factors. The objective of this study was to systematically review primary studies that focus on the biomechanical properties of dental implants in order to determine which biomechanical properties are most important for success of dental implant therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic database search was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Google Scholar, and CAB Abstracts. Six principal biomechanical properties were considered to prepare the search strategy for each database using key words and Boolean operators. Human and animal studies (observational studies, trials, and <i>in vitro</i> studies) were included in this review. Human studies that were considered eligible needed to have subjects above 18 years who received permanent restorations after implant surgery and followed up for at least 6 months after receiving permanent restorations. Studies with subjects who had absolute contraindications at the time of dental implant surgery were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 28 studies were included in the review after application of the eligibility criteria; 18 <i>in vitro</i> studies, 5 cohort clinical studies, 3 animal studies, and 2 nonrandomized trials. Six <i>in vitro</i> studies assessed loss of preload, five <i>in vitro</i> studies assessed fatigue strength, four assessed implant abutment connection design, and one assessed implant diameter. Two nonrandomized trials assessed torque and six observational studies assessed the effect of cantilevers. Gold alloy coating of abutment screws resulted in higher preload values followed by titanium alloy coating and gold coating; there was a difference in preload values between coated and uncoated screws when tightened repeatedly. Preload values decreased as a function of time with majority of preload loss occurred within 10s of tightening. The 8-degree internal conical implant performed better than the internal hex design. Higher rate of complications (porcelain chipping, de-cementation) was observed in the cantilever groups in studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biomechanical properties of implants like preload, torque, cantilever design, implant abutment design have profound effects on the survival rates of dental implants. With limiations, this review provides some important parameters to consider for successful implant therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":520674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"700-714"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e3/5a/JISPCD-10-700.PMC7791586.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_138_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Dental implants are considered the best treatment option for replacement of missing teeth due to high survival rates and diverse applications. However, not all dental implant therapies are successful and some fail due to various biological and or/mechanical factors. The objective of this study was to systematically review primary studies that focus on the biomechanical properties of dental implants in order to determine which biomechanical properties are most important for success of dental implant therapy.

Materials and methods: An electronic database search was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Google Scholar, and CAB Abstracts. Six principal biomechanical properties were considered to prepare the search strategy for each database using key words and Boolean operators. Human and animal studies (observational studies, trials, and in vitro studies) were included in this review. Human studies that were considered eligible needed to have subjects above 18 years who received permanent restorations after implant surgery and followed up for at least 6 months after receiving permanent restorations. Studies with subjects who had absolute contraindications at the time of dental implant surgery were excluded.

Results: In total, 28 studies were included in the review after application of the eligibility criteria; 18 in vitro studies, 5 cohort clinical studies, 3 animal studies, and 2 nonrandomized trials. Six in vitro studies assessed loss of preload, five in vitro studies assessed fatigue strength, four assessed implant abutment connection design, and one assessed implant diameter. Two nonrandomized trials assessed torque and six observational studies assessed the effect of cantilevers. Gold alloy coating of abutment screws resulted in higher preload values followed by titanium alloy coating and gold coating; there was a difference in preload values between coated and uncoated screws when tightened repeatedly. Preload values decreased as a function of time with majority of preload loss occurred within 10s of tightening. The 8-degree internal conical implant performed better than the internal hex design. Higher rate of complications (porcelain chipping, de-cementation) was observed in the cantilever groups in studies.

Conclusion: Biomechanical properties of implants like preload, torque, cantilever design, implant abutment design have profound effects on the survival rates of dental implants. With limiations, this review provides some important parameters to consider for successful implant therapy.

Abstract Image

成功种植体治疗的生物力学:系统综述。
背景:种植体因其高成活率和广泛的应用被认为是牙齿缺失的最佳治疗选择。然而,并不是所有的种植牙治疗都是成功的,有些由于各种生物和/或机械因素而失败。本研究的目的是系统地回顾关于种植体生物力学特性的初步研究,以确定哪些生物力学特性对种植体治疗的成功最重要。材料和方法:使用MEDLINE (PubMed)、EMBASE、Google Scholar和CAB Abstracts进行电子数据库检索。考虑了六个主要的生物力学特性,使用关键字和布尔运算符为每个数据库准备搜索策略。本综述包括人类和动物研究(观察性研究、试验和体外研究)。被认为符合条件的人类研究需要18岁以上的受试者在种植手术后接受永久修复,并在接受永久修复后至少随访6个月。在种植牙手术时有绝对禁忌症的研究被排除在外。结果:应用入选标准后,共纳入28项研究;18项体外研究,5项队列临床研究,3项动物研究和2项非随机试验。6项体外研究评估预载荷损失,5项体外研究评估疲劳强度,4项评估种植体基台连接设计,1项评估种植体直径。两项非随机试验评估扭矩,六项观察性研究评估悬臂梁的效果。基台螺钉包覆金合金后预紧力值较高,其次为钛合金包覆金;当反复拧紧时,涂覆螺钉和未涂覆螺钉的预紧力值存在差异。预紧力随时间减小,预紧力损失主要发生在拧紧后10s内。8度内锥形种植体优于内六角设计。在研究中,观察到悬臂组的并发症(瓷屑,脱骨)发生率较高。结论:种植体的预紧力、扭矩、悬臂设计、基台设计等生物力学特性对种植体成活率有重要影响。尽管存在局限性,本文综述提供了一些重要的参数来考虑成功的种植治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信