Assessment of a novel genetic counselling intervention to inform assisted reproductive technology treatments and other family-building options in adults with cystic fibrosis

Q1 Social Sciences
Sulagna Kushary , Nadia Ali , Jessica B. Spencer , Jamie Dokson , William R. Hunt
{"title":"Assessment of a novel genetic counselling intervention to inform assisted reproductive technology treatments and other family-building options in adults with cystic fibrosis","authors":"Sulagna Kushary ,&nbsp;Nadia Ali ,&nbsp;Jessica B. Spencer ,&nbsp;Jamie Dokson ,&nbsp;William R. Hunt","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are living well into their adult years and contemplating parenthood. Previous studies have shown that there is an opportunity to improve understanding of inheritance and genetics among individuals with CF. This study explored whether a genetic counselling intervention would be associated with a change in knowledge and/or beliefs about genetics and family-building options. Adults (age ≥ 18 years) presenting to a CF clinic were approached for inclusion. Participants completed a pre-intervention survey to measure their knowledge of CF genetics, as well as perceptions and understanding of assisted reproductive technology treatments and other family-building options. Subjects then partook in a genetic counselling session. Subjects repeated the survey immediately after the session and 1–3 months later. Data analysis used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), repeated measures ANOVA and multiple linear regression. Thirty-five subjects [19 (54%) men and 16 (45%) women] with a mean (±standard deviation) age of 28 ± 5.64 years were enrolled in the study. Before the intervention, 61.69% ± 4.50 of knowledge-based questions were answered correctly. Immediately after the intervention, the mean score increased to 77.71% ± 3.23, but this decreased to 69.48% ± 4.02 for the third test (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05, repeated measures ANOVA). Six individuals changed their family-building preference following the genetic counselling session. A short genetic consultation was associated with a significant improvement in CF-specific genetic knowledge. However, knowledge was not retained fully for a longer time period following the consultation. Multiple discussions regarding fertility options are needed to reinforce the key concepts related to CF genetics and fertility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"13 ","pages":"Pages 37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.05.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661821000113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Many patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are living well into their adult years and contemplating parenthood. Previous studies have shown that there is an opportunity to improve understanding of inheritance and genetics among individuals with CF. This study explored whether a genetic counselling intervention would be associated with a change in knowledge and/or beliefs about genetics and family-building options. Adults (age ≥ 18 years) presenting to a CF clinic were approached for inclusion. Participants completed a pre-intervention survey to measure their knowledge of CF genetics, as well as perceptions and understanding of assisted reproductive technology treatments and other family-building options. Subjects then partook in a genetic counselling session. Subjects repeated the survey immediately after the session and 1–3 months later. Data analysis used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), repeated measures ANOVA and multiple linear regression. Thirty-five subjects [19 (54%) men and 16 (45%) women] with a mean (±standard deviation) age of 28 ± 5.64 years were enrolled in the study. Before the intervention, 61.69% ± 4.50 of knowledge-based questions were answered correctly. Immediately after the intervention, the mean score increased to 77.71% ± 3.23, but this decreased to 69.48% ± 4.02 for the third test (P < 0.05, repeated measures ANOVA). Six individuals changed their family-building preference following the genetic counselling session. A short genetic consultation was associated with a significant improvement in CF-specific genetic knowledge. However, knowledge was not retained fully for a longer time period following the consultation. Multiple discussions regarding fertility options are needed to reinforce the key concepts related to CF genetics and fertility.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对囊性纤维化成人辅助生殖技术治疗和其他家庭建设选择的新型遗传咨询干预的评估
许多患有囊性纤维化(CF)的患者都活得很好,进入了他们的成年期,并在考虑做父母。先前的研究表明,有机会提高对CF患者遗传和遗传学的理解。本研究探讨了遗传咨询干预是否与遗传学和家庭建设选择的知识和/或信念的改变有关。到CF诊所就诊的成人(年龄 ≥ 18 岁)被纳入研究。参与者完成了一项干预前调查,以衡量他们对CF遗传学的了解,以及对辅助生殖技术治疗和其他家庭建设选择的看法和理解。然后,研究对象参加了一个基因咨询会议。受试者在疗程结束后立即和1-3个月 后重复调查。数据分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)和多元线性回归。共纳入35例受试者,男性19例(54%),女性16例(45%),平均(±标准差)年龄为28岁 ± 5.64 岁。干预前,知识题正确率为61.69%±4.50。干预后立即,平均得分上升到77.71%±3.23,但第三次测试的平均得分下降到69.48%±4.02 (P < 0.05,重复测量方差分析)。六个人在接受基因咨询后改变了他们的家庭建设偏好。短暂的遗传咨询与cf特异性遗传知识的显著改善相关。但是,在协商之后的较长时间内,知识并没有得到充分保留。需要对生育选择进行多次讨论,以加强与CF遗传学和生育有关的关键概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: RBMS is a new journal dedicated to interdisciplinary discussion and debate of the rapidly expanding field of reproductive biomedicine, particularly all of its many societal and cultural implications. It is intended to bring to attention new research in the social sciences, arts and humanities on human reproduction, new reproductive technologies, and related areas such as human embryonic stem cell derivation. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy makers, academics and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信