Developing and validating an opioid overdose prevention and response curriculum for undergraduate medical education.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Substance abuse Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-02 DOI:10.1080/08897077.2021.1941515
Tabitha E Moses, Jessica L Moreno, Mark K Greenwald, Eva Waineo
{"title":"Developing and validating an opioid overdose prevention and response curriculum for undergraduate medical education.","authors":"Tabitha E Moses,&nbsp;Jessica L Moreno,&nbsp;Mark K Greenwald,&nbsp;Eva Waineo","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2021.1941515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction:</i> As rates of overdose and substance use disorders (SUDs) increase, medical schools are starting to incorporate more content on SUDs and harm reduction in undergraduate medical education (UME). Initial data suggest these additions may improve medical student knowledge and attitudes toward patients with SUDs; however, there is no standard curriculum. <i>Methods:</i> This project uses a six-step approach to UME curricular development to identify needs and goals regarding SUDs and opioid overdose at a large single-campus medical school in the United States. We first developed and delivered a pilot curriculum to a small group of medical students. Pilot results and a larger survey led to implementing a one-hour Opioid Overdose Prevention and Response (OOPR) Training for first-year students. Effects of training were tracked using baseline and post-training surveys examining knowledge and attitudes toward opioid overdose and patients with SUDs. <i>Results:</i> Needs assessment indicated desire and need for training. The pilot study (<i>N</i> = 66) resulted in significantly improved knowledge regarding opioid overdose; 100% of students enjoyed training and believed others should receive it. The larger replication study surveyed all incoming students (<i>N</i> = 266) to gauge initial knowledge and experiences with these topics. Results prompted enhancement of the OOPR Training curriculum, which was delivered to half of the first-year class. Post-training survey results replicated the pilot study findings. The majority (95.2%) of students enjoyed training and 98.4% believed all students should receive it. <i>Conclusion:</i> Delivering a thorough curriculum on SUDs and harm reduction in UME is critical. Although many schools are implementing training, there is no standard curriculum. We outline a low-resource training intervention for OOPR. Our findings identified key features to include in these UME curricula. This approach provides a replicable template for schools seeking to develop brief educational interventions and identify essential content for curricula in SUDs and harm reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":" ","pages":"309-318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08897077.2021.1941515","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1941515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Introduction: As rates of overdose and substance use disorders (SUDs) increase, medical schools are starting to incorporate more content on SUDs and harm reduction in undergraduate medical education (UME). Initial data suggest these additions may improve medical student knowledge and attitudes toward patients with SUDs; however, there is no standard curriculum. Methods: This project uses a six-step approach to UME curricular development to identify needs and goals regarding SUDs and opioid overdose at a large single-campus medical school in the United States. We first developed and delivered a pilot curriculum to a small group of medical students. Pilot results and a larger survey led to implementing a one-hour Opioid Overdose Prevention and Response (OOPR) Training for first-year students. Effects of training were tracked using baseline and post-training surveys examining knowledge and attitudes toward opioid overdose and patients with SUDs. Results: Needs assessment indicated desire and need for training. The pilot study (N = 66) resulted in significantly improved knowledge regarding opioid overdose; 100% of students enjoyed training and believed others should receive it. The larger replication study surveyed all incoming students (N = 266) to gauge initial knowledge and experiences with these topics. Results prompted enhancement of the OOPR Training curriculum, which was delivered to half of the first-year class. Post-training survey results replicated the pilot study findings. The majority (95.2%) of students enjoyed training and 98.4% believed all students should receive it. Conclusion: Delivering a thorough curriculum on SUDs and harm reduction in UME is critical. Although many schools are implementing training, there is no standard curriculum. We outline a low-resource training intervention for OOPR. Our findings identified key features to include in these UME curricula. This approach provides a replicable template for schools seeking to develop brief educational interventions and identify essential content for curricula in SUDs and harm reduction.

开发和验证阿片类药物过量预防和应对课程本科医学教育。
导读:随着药物过量和药物使用障碍(SUDs)的比率增加,医学院开始在本科医学教育(UME)中纳入更多关于药物过量和减少危害的内容。初步数据表明,这些添加物可以提高医学生对sud患者的认识和态度;然而,没有标准的课程。方法:本项目采用六步方法进行UME课程开发,以确定美国一所大型单校区医学院关于sud和阿片类药物过量的需求和目标。我们首先为一小群医科学生开发并提供了一个试点课程。试点结果和更大规模的调查导致对一年级学生实施一小时的阿片类药物过量预防和反应(OOPR)培训。通过基线和训练后调查来跟踪训练的效果,调查对阿片类药物过量和sud患者的知识和态度。结果:需求评估表明了培训的愿望和需要。初步研究(N = 66)显著提高了对阿片类药物过量的认识;100%的学生喜欢培训,并认为其他人也应该接受培训。更大规模的复制研究调查了所有新生(N = 266),以评估对这些主题的初步知识和经验。结果促使加强了面向开放项目办公室的培训课程,该课程已向一半的一年级班级提供。培训后的调查结果重复了试点研究的结果。大多数学生(95.2%)喜欢培训,98.4%认为所有学生都应该接受培训。结论:在UME中提供关于sud和减少危害的全面课程至关重要。虽然许多学校正在实施培训,但没有标准的课程。我们概述了一种面向开放式门诊的低资源培训干预措施。我们的研究结果确定了这些UME课程的关键特征。这种方法为寻求制定简短的教育干预措施和确定sud和减少伤害课程的基本内容的学校提供了一个可复制的模板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance abuse
Substance abuse SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its 4th decade of publication, Substance Abuse journal is a peer-reviewed journal that serves as the official publication of Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse (AMERSA) in association with The International Society of Addiction Medicine (ISAM) and the International Coalition for Addiction Studies in Education (INCASE). Substance Abuse journal offers wide-ranging coverage for healthcare professionals, addiction specialists and others engaged in research, education, clinical care, and service delivery and evaluation. It features articles on a variety of topics, including: Interdisciplinary addiction research, education, and treatment Clinical trial, epidemiology, health services, and translation addiction research Implementation science related to addiction Innovations and subsequent outcomes in addiction education Addiction policy and opinion International addiction topics Clinical care regarding addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信