What behaviour change techniques have been used to improve adherence to evidence-based low back pain imaging?

Amanda Hall, Helen Richmond, Andrea Pike, Rebecca Lawrence, Holly Etchegary, Michelle Swab, Jacqueline Y Thompson, Charlotte Albury, Jill Hayden, Andrea M Patey, James Matthews
{"title":"What behaviour change techniques have been used to improve adherence to evidence-based low back pain imaging?","authors":"Amanda Hall,&nbsp;Helen Richmond,&nbsp;Andrea Pike,&nbsp;Rebecca Lawrence,&nbsp;Holly Etchegary,&nbsp;Michelle Swab,&nbsp;Jacqueline Y Thompson,&nbsp;Charlotte Albury,&nbsp;Jill Hayden,&nbsp;Andrea M Patey,&nbsp;James Matthews","doi":"10.1186/s13012-021-01136-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite international guideline recommendations, low back pain (LBP) imaging rates have been increasing over the last 20 years. Previous systematic reviews report limited effectiveness of implementation interventions aimed at reducing unnecessary LBP imaging. No previous reviews have analysed these implementation interventions to ascertain what behaviour change techniques (BCTs) have been used in this field. Understanding what techniques have been implemented in this field is an essential first step before exploring intervention effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched EMBASE, Ovid (Medline), CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to February 1, 2021, as well as and hand-searched 6 relevant systematic reviews and conducted citation tracking of included studies. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility and extracted data on study and intervention characteristics. Study interventions were qualitatively analysed by three coders to identify BCTs, which were mapped to mechanisms of action from the theoretical domains framework (TDF) using the Theory and Techniques Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 36 eligible studies from 1984 citations in our electronic search and a further 2 studies from hand-searching resulting in 38 studies that targeted physician behaviour to reduce unnecessary LBP imaging. The studies were conducted in 6 countries in primary (n = 31) or emergency care (n = 7) settings. Thirty-four studies were included in our BCT synthesis which found the most frequently used BCTs were '4.1 instruction on how to perform the behaviour' (e.g. Active/passive guideline dissemination and/or educational seminars/workshops), followed by '9.1 credible source', '2.2 feedback on behaviour' (e.g. electronic feedback reports on physicians' image ordering) and 7.1 prompts and cues (electronic decision support or hard-copy posters/booklets for the office). This review highlighted that the majority of studies used education and/or feedback on behaviour to target the domains of knowledge and in some cases also skills and beliefs about capabilities to bring about a change in LBP imaging behaviour. Additionally, we found there to be a growing use of electronic or hard copy reminders to target the domains of memory and environmental context and resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to identify what BCTs have been used to target a reduction in physician image ordering behaviour. The majority of included studies lacked the use of theory to inform their intervention design and failed to target known physician-reported barriers to following LBP imaging guidelines.</p><p><strong>Protocol registation: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42017072518.</p>","PeriodicalId":417097,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science : IS","volume":" ","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13012-021-01136-w","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science : IS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01136-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Despite international guideline recommendations, low back pain (LBP) imaging rates have been increasing over the last 20 years. Previous systematic reviews report limited effectiveness of implementation interventions aimed at reducing unnecessary LBP imaging. No previous reviews have analysed these implementation interventions to ascertain what behaviour change techniques (BCTs) have been used in this field. Understanding what techniques have been implemented in this field is an essential first step before exploring intervention effectiveness.

Methods: We searched EMBASE, Ovid (Medline), CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to February 1, 2021, as well as and hand-searched 6 relevant systematic reviews and conducted citation tracking of included studies. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility and extracted data on study and intervention characteristics. Study interventions were qualitatively analysed by three coders to identify BCTs, which were mapped to mechanisms of action from the theoretical domains framework (TDF) using the Theory and Techniques Tool.

Results: We identified 36 eligible studies from 1984 citations in our electronic search and a further 2 studies from hand-searching resulting in 38 studies that targeted physician behaviour to reduce unnecessary LBP imaging. The studies were conducted in 6 countries in primary (n = 31) or emergency care (n = 7) settings. Thirty-four studies were included in our BCT synthesis which found the most frequently used BCTs were '4.1 instruction on how to perform the behaviour' (e.g. Active/passive guideline dissemination and/or educational seminars/workshops), followed by '9.1 credible source', '2.2 feedback on behaviour' (e.g. electronic feedback reports on physicians' image ordering) and 7.1 prompts and cues (electronic decision support or hard-copy posters/booklets for the office). This review highlighted that the majority of studies used education and/or feedback on behaviour to target the domains of knowledge and in some cases also skills and beliefs about capabilities to bring about a change in LBP imaging behaviour. Additionally, we found there to be a growing use of electronic or hard copy reminders to target the domains of memory and environmental context and resources.

Conclusions: This is the first study to identify what BCTs have been used to target a reduction in physician image ordering behaviour. The majority of included studies lacked the use of theory to inform their intervention design and failed to target known physician-reported barriers to following LBP imaging guidelines.

Protocol registation: PROSPERO CRD42017072518.

Abstract Image

哪些行为改变技术被用于提高对循证腰痛成像的依从性?
背景:尽管国际指南推荐,腰痛(LBP)成像率在过去20年中一直在增加。以前的系统综述报告,旨在减少不必要的腰痛成像的实施干预措施的有效性有限。以前没有评论分析过这些实施干预措施,以确定在该领域使用了哪些行为改变技术(bct)。了解在该领域实施了哪些技术是探索干预效果之前必不可少的第一步。方法:检索EMBASE、Ovid (Medline)、CINAHL和Cochrane CENTRAL数据库自成立至2021年2月1日,手工检索6篇相关系统综述,并对纳入的研究进行引文跟踪。两位作者独立筛选标题、摘要和全文,以确定其合格性,并提取有关研究和干预特征的数据。研究干预措施由三名编码器进行定性分析,以确定btc,并使用理论和技术工具将其映射到理论领域框架(TDF)的作用机制。结果:我们在电子检索中从1984年引文中确定了36项符合条件的研究,另外从手工检索中确定了2项研究,结果是38项研究以医生行为为目标,以减少不必要的LBP成像。这些研究在6个国家的初级(n = 31)或急诊(n = 7)环境中进行。我们的BCT综合研究中包括34项研究,发现最常用的BCT是“4.1关于如何执行行为的指导”(例如主动/被动指南传播和/或教育研讨会/讲习班),其次是“9.1可信来源”,“2.2行为反馈”(例如关于医生图像排序的电子反馈报告)和7.1提示和提示(电子决策支持或办公室的硬拷贝海报/小册子)。这篇综述强调,大多数研究使用教育和/或行为反馈来针对知识领域,在某些情况下还使用技能和信念来改变LBP成像行为。此外,我们发现越来越多的人使用电子或硬拷贝提醒来瞄准记忆、环境背景和资源领域。结论:这是第一个确定bct用于减少医生图像排序行为的研究。大多数纳入的研究缺乏理论来指导其干预设计,并且未能针对已知的医生报告的遵循腰痛成像指南的障碍。协议注册:PROSPERO CRD42017072518。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信