Economic evaluation of a web-based menu planning intervention to improve childcare service adherence with dietary guidelines.

Penny Reeves, Kim Edmunds, Zoe Szewczyk, Alice Grady, Sze Lin Yoong, Luke Wolfenden, Rebecca Wyse, Meghan Finch, Fiona Stacey, John Wiggers, Andrew Searles
{"title":"Economic evaluation of a web-based menu planning intervention to improve childcare service adherence with dietary guidelines.","authors":"Penny Reeves,&nbsp;Kim Edmunds,&nbsp;Zoe Szewczyk,&nbsp;Alice Grady,&nbsp;Sze Lin Yoong,&nbsp;Luke Wolfenden,&nbsp;Rebecca Wyse,&nbsp;Meghan Finch,&nbsp;Fiona Stacey,&nbsp;John Wiggers,&nbsp;Andrew Searles","doi":"10.1186/s13012-020-01068-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the known benefits of healthy eating in childhood, few Australian childcare services provide food that is consistent with dietary guidelines. The effectiveness of a web-based menu planning intervention to increase childcare service provision of healthy foods and decrease provision of discretionary foods in long day-care services in Australia was assessed in a randomised controlled trial. Here we consider the costs, consequences, cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the intervention using data collected within the trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective trial-based economic evaluation involved 54 childcare services across New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Services were randomised to a 12-month intervention or usual care. The intervention involved access to a web-based menu planning and decision support tool and online resources. Effectiveness measures included mean number of food groups, overall menu and individual food group compliance with dietary guidelines, and mean servings of food groups at 12 months. Costs (reported in $AUD, 2017/18) were evaluated from both health sector and societal perspectives. The direct cost to support uptake of the intervention was calculated, as were costs to each childcare service. The incremental cost of the intervention was calculated as the net difference in the cost to undertake menu planning and review plus the direct cost of the intervention. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) including uncertainty intervals were estimated for differences in costs and effects between intervention and control groups. A relative value index was calculated to determine overall value for money.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 12 months of the trial, we calculated a difference in cost between usual practice and intervention groups of - $482 (95% UI - $859, - $56). While the measured increase in menu and food group compliance within the trial did not reach statistical significance, there were significant improvements in mean servings of fruit and discretionary food, represented in the cost-consequence analysis. The calculated relative value index of 1.1 suggests that the intervention returns acceptable value for money for the outcomes generated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to usual practice, web-based programmes may offer an efficient and sustainable alternative for childcare services to improve the provision of healthy foods to children in their care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616000974404.</p>","PeriodicalId":417097,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science : IS","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13012-020-01068-x","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science : IS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01068-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: Despite the known benefits of healthy eating in childhood, few Australian childcare services provide food that is consistent with dietary guidelines. The effectiveness of a web-based menu planning intervention to increase childcare service provision of healthy foods and decrease provision of discretionary foods in long day-care services in Australia was assessed in a randomised controlled trial. Here we consider the costs, consequences, cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the intervention using data collected within the trial.

Methods: The prospective trial-based economic evaluation involved 54 childcare services across New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Services were randomised to a 12-month intervention or usual care. The intervention involved access to a web-based menu planning and decision support tool and online resources. Effectiveness measures included mean number of food groups, overall menu and individual food group compliance with dietary guidelines, and mean servings of food groups at 12 months. Costs (reported in $AUD, 2017/18) were evaluated from both health sector and societal perspectives. The direct cost to support uptake of the intervention was calculated, as were costs to each childcare service. The incremental cost of the intervention was calculated as the net difference in the cost to undertake menu planning and review plus the direct cost of the intervention. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) including uncertainty intervals were estimated for differences in costs and effects between intervention and control groups. A relative value index was calculated to determine overall value for money.

Results: Over the 12 months of the trial, we calculated a difference in cost between usual practice and intervention groups of - $482 (95% UI - $859, - $56). While the measured increase in menu and food group compliance within the trial did not reach statistical significance, there were significant improvements in mean servings of fruit and discretionary food, represented in the cost-consequence analysis. The calculated relative value index of 1.1 suggests that the intervention returns acceptable value for money for the outcomes generated.

Conclusion: Compared to usual practice, web-based programmes may offer an efficient and sustainable alternative for childcare services to improve the provision of healthy foods to children in their care.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616000974404.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于网络的菜单计划干预提高托儿服务遵循膳食指南的经济评估。
背景:尽管儿童期健康饮食的好处是众所周知的,但很少有澳大利亚的托儿服务机构提供符合膳食指南的食物。在澳大利亚的一项随机对照试验中,评估了基于网络的菜单规划干预措施的有效性,以增加儿童保育服务中健康食品的提供,减少长期日托服务中随意食品的提供。在这里,我们使用试验中收集的数据来考虑干预的成本、后果、成本效益和预算影响。方法:前瞻性试验经济评价涉及澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)的54家托儿服务机构。服务对象随机分为12个月干预组和常规护理组。干预包括访问基于网络的菜单规划和决策支持工具以及在线资源。有效性测量包括食物组的平均数量,总体菜单和个别食物组对饮食指南的依从性,以及12个月食物组的平均份量。从卫生部门和社会角度对成本(以2017/18年度澳元为单位)进行了评估。计算了支持采取干预措施的直接成本,以及每个托儿服务的成本。干预的增量成本计算为进行菜单计划和审查的成本加上干预的直接成本的净差。增量成本-效果比(ICERs)包括不确定区间,用于评估干预组和对照组之间成本和效果的差异。计算了一个相对价值指数,以确定金钱的总体价值。结果:在12个月的试验中,我们计算出常规做法组和干预组之间的成本差异为- 482美元(95% UI - 859美元,- 56美元)。虽然在试验中测量到的菜单和食物组依从性的增加没有达到统计学意义,但在成本-后果分析中,水果和可自由选择食物的平均份量有显著改善。计算出的相对价值指数为1.1,表明干预所产生的结果带来了可接受的物有所值。结论:与通常做法相比,基于网络的方案可能为儿童保育服务提供一种有效和可持续的替代方案,以改善其所照顾儿童的健康食品供应。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12616000974404。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信