Development and initial validation of the Odense Child Trauma Screening: a story stem screening tool for preschool and young schoolchildren.

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Sille Schandorph Løkkegaard, Mette Elmose, Ask Elklit
{"title":"Development and initial validation of the Odense Child Trauma Screening: a story stem screening tool for preschool and young schoolchildren.","authors":"Sille Schandorph Løkkegaard,&nbsp;Mette Elmose,&nbsp;Ask Elklit","doi":"10.21307/sjcapp-2021-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification of young children exposed to trauma who are at risk of developing post-trauma symptomatology such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or other emotional or behavioral problems is important for allocating appropriate treatment and preventing long-term consequences. However, assessment of young children exposed to trauma is challenging because children may not be able to talk about their trauma or trauma reactions. Story stem tools combine storytelling and play to access the internal world of young children and can be used in the assessment of children exposed to trauma.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine reliability and validity of a new story stem tool, the Odense Child Trauma Screening (OCTS). OCTS was developed to screen for play-based behavior and narrative representations indicative of traumatization in preschool and young schoolchildren.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty-nine Danish children aged 4.5-8.9 years (M = 6.6, SD = 1.2) participated in the OCTS. Participants included a risk sample of 31 children exposed to traumas and a community sample of 18 children. Caregivers were interviewed about child symptoms of PTSD, major depressive disorder (MDD), and reactive attachment disorder (RAD) and answered the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The community sample completed OCTS test-retests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interrater reliability proved excellent (ICC = .96-1.00). Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC = .66). Significant moderate correlations were found between the OCTS total score and scales of PTSD, MDD and RAD and the SDQ Total Difficulties Scale. The ability of the OCTS to discriminate between children from the risk and community sample was good.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study provided preliminary evidence of reliability and validity of the OCTS as a screening tool for young children exposed to trauma. OCTS shows promise as a standardized, age-appropriate informant-based screening measure applicable for clinical assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":42655,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c9/e5/sjcapp-9-013.PMC8216242.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2021-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early identification of young children exposed to trauma who are at risk of developing post-trauma symptomatology such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or other emotional or behavioral problems is important for allocating appropriate treatment and preventing long-term consequences. However, assessment of young children exposed to trauma is challenging because children may not be able to talk about their trauma or trauma reactions. Story stem tools combine storytelling and play to access the internal world of young children and can be used in the assessment of children exposed to trauma.

Objective: To examine reliability and validity of a new story stem tool, the Odense Child Trauma Screening (OCTS). OCTS was developed to screen for play-based behavior and narrative representations indicative of traumatization in preschool and young schoolchildren.

Method: Forty-nine Danish children aged 4.5-8.9 years (M = 6.6, SD = 1.2) participated in the OCTS. Participants included a risk sample of 31 children exposed to traumas and a community sample of 18 children. Caregivers were interviewed about child symptoms of PTSD, major depressive disorder (MDD), and reactive attachment disorder (RAD) and answered the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The community sample completed OCTS test-retests.

Results: Interrater reliability proved excellent (ICC = .96-1.00). Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC = .66). Significant moderate correlations were found between the OCTS total score and scales of PTSD, MDD and RAD and the SDQ Total Difficulties Scale. The ability of the OCTS to discriminate between children from the risk and community sample was good.

Conclusions: The study provided preliminary evidence of reliability and validity of the OCTS as a screening tool for young children exposed to trauma. OCTS shows promise as a standardized, age-appropriate informant-based screening measure applicable for clinical assessment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

开发和初步验证欧登塞儿童创伤筛查:一个故事干筛选工具,为学龄前儿童和年幼的学童。
背景:早期识别暴露于创伤的幼儿有可能出现创伤后症状,如创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)或其他情绪或行为问题,对于分配适当的治疗和预防长期后果非常重要。然而,对遭受创伤的幼儿进行评估是具有挑战性的,因为儿童可能无法谈论他们的创伤或创伤反应。故事干工具将讲故事和游戏结合起来,进入幼儿的内心世界,可用于评估遭受创伤的儿童。目的:检验欧登塞儿童创伤筛查(OCTS)的信度和效度。OCTS的发展是为了筛查学龄前儿童和幼儿的基于游戏的行为和表明创伤的叙事表征。方法:49名年龄4.5 ~ 8.9岁的丹麦儿童(M = 6.6, SD = 1.2)参加OCTS。参与者包括31名遭受创伤的儿童的风险样本和18名社区儿童的样本。对照顾者进行关于儿童PTSD、重度抑郁障碍(MDD)和反应性依恋障碍(RAD)症状的访谈,并回答优势与困难问卷(SDQ)。社区样本完成了OCTS测试复测。结果:量表间信度极好(ICC = 0.96 ~ 1.00)。重测信度可接受(ICC = .66)。OCTS总分与PTSD、MDD、RAD量表和SDQ总困难量表存在显著的中度相关。OCTS区分风险样本和社区样本的能力很好。结论:本研究为OCTS作为幼儿创伤暴露筛查工具的可靠性和有效性提供了初步证据。OCTS有望成为一种标准化的、适合年龄的、基于信息的筛查措施,适用于临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信