Damage Control for renal trauma: the more conservative the surgeon, better for the kidney.

Pub Date : 2021-05-13 DOI:10.25100/cm.v52i2.4682
Alexander Salcedo, Carlos A Ordoñez, Michael W Parra, José Daniel Osorio, Philip Leib, Yaset Caicedo, Mónica Guzmán-Rodríguez, Natalia Padilla, Luis Fernando Pino, Mario Alain Herrera, Adolfo González Hadad, José Julián Serna, Alberto García, Federico Coccolini, Fausto Catena
{"title":"Damage Control for renal trauma: the more conservative the surgeon, better for the kidney.","authors":"Alexander Salcedo, Carlos A Ordoñez, Michael W Parra, José Daniel Osorio, Philip Leib, Yaset Caicedo, Mónica Guzmán-Rodríguez, Natalia Padilla, Luis Fernando Pino, Mario Alain Herrera, Adolfo González Hadad, José Julián Serna, Alberto García, Federico Coccolini, Fausto Catena","doi":"10.25100/cm.v52i2.4682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urologic trauma is frequently reported in patients with penetrating trauma. Currently, the computerized tomography and vascular approach through angiography/embolization are the standard approaches for renal trauma. However, the management of renal or urinary tract trauma in a patient with hemodynamic instability and criteria for emergency laparotomy, is a topic of discussion. This article presents the consensus of the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) from Cali, for the management of penetrating renal and urinary tract trauma through damage control surgery. Intrasurgical perirenal hematoma characteristics, such as if it is expanding or actively bleeding, can be reference for deciding whether a conservative approach with subsequent radiological studies is possible. However, if there is evidence of severe kidney trauma, surgical exploration is mandatory and entails a high probability of requiring a nephrectomy. Urinary tract damage control should be conservative and deferred, because this type of trauma does not represent a risk in acute trauma management.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"52 2","pages":"e4094682"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b6/62/1657-9534-cm-52-02-e4094682.PMC8216050.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v52i2.4682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urologic trauma is frequently reported in patients with penetrating trauma. Currently, the computerized tomography and vascular approach through angiography/embolization are the standard approaches for renal trauma. However, the management of renal or urinary tract trauma in a patient with hemodynamic instability and criteria for emergency laparotomy, is a topic of discussion. This article presents the consensus of the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) from Cali, for the management of penetrating renal and urinary tract trauma through damage control surgery. Intrasurgical perirenal hematoma characteristics, such as if it is expanding or actively bleeding, can be reference for deciding whether a conservative approach with subsequent radiological studies is possible. However, if there is evidence of severe kidney trauma, surgical exploration is mandatory and entails a high probability of requiring a nephrectomy. Urinary tract damage control should be conservative and deferred, because this type of trauma does not represent a risk in acute trauma management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
肾创伤的损害控制:外科医生越保守,对肾脏越有利。
泌尿系统创伤经常见于穿透性创伤患者。目前,计算机断层扫描和通过血管造影/栓塞治疗血管是治疗肾创伤的标准方法。然而,如何处理血流动力学不稳定且符合紧急开腹手术标准的患者的肾脏或泌尿道创伤是一个值得讨论的话题。本文介绍了卡利创伤和急诊外科小组(CTE)就通过损伤控制手术治疗穿透性肾和泌尿道创伤达成的共识。手术中肾周血肿的特征,如血肿是否扩大或正在出血,可作为决定是否可以采取保守疗法并进行后续放射学检查的参考。但是,如果有证据表明肾脏受到严重创伤,则必须进行手术探查,而且很有可能需要进行肾切除术。尿路损伤控制应采取保守和延迟的方式,因为这种类型的创伤在急性创伤处理中并不构成风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信