Lewis Mehl-Madrona, Patrick McFarlane, Barbara Mainguy
{"title":"Effects of a Life Story Interview on the Physician-Patient Relationship with Chronic Pain Patients in a Primary Care Setting.","authors":"Lewis Mehl-Madrona, Patrick McFarlane, Barbara Mainguy","doi":"10.1089/acm.2020.0449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Within family medicine it is generally accepted that the more we know about patients' lives, the better the care we provide. Few studies have sought to quantify this historical assumption. We wondered if knowing their chronic pain, patients' life stories would improve the physician-patient relationship in a family medicine residency training program clinic. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We selected patients in chronic pain with depression and/or anxiety who were considered difficult. After a lead in period to establish stability of ratings, we obtained a life story interview for 125 such patients after administering the doctor-patient relationship questionnaire to them and their physicians. Patients completed the McGill Pain Inventory (MPQ), the Zung Anxiety Inventory, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Physicians completed the Jefferson Physicians Empathy Scale. Questionnaires were repeated every 4 months. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The quality of the physician-patient relationship increased significantly over the course of the year for patients (increase of 0.60, standard deviation [SD] = 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57 to 0.63, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and for doctors (increase of 0.77, SD = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.81, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The perceived level of pain on the MPQ decreased significantly on the sensory component (71.2 ± 7.6 to 11.7 + 9.4, 95% CI = 0.589 to 9.411, <i>p</i> = 0.0270 and the affective component (4.2 + 3.4 to 2.1 + 4.3, 95% CI = 0.131 to 4.069, <i>p</i> = 0.037). Anxiety and depression ratings did not change. Physicians' empathy ratings increased significantly over the course of the year from a mean of 117.2 (SD = 10.2) to 125.1 (SD = 16.1) for a difference of 7.90, which was significant at <i>p</i> = 0.0273 with a 95% CI of -14.85 to -0.915. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Knowing the patient's life story improves the physician-patient relationship for both patients and physicians. When the physician-patient relationship improves, the perceived level of pain decreases. Physicians' empathy ratings increase. While the interview requires 90-120 min, it is billable, and can be done by medical students, medical assistants, social workers, or behavioral health. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Obtaining life stories of chronic pain patients is a cost-effective way to reduce pain while simultaneously improving the physician-patient relationship and increasing physician empathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14944,"journal":{"name":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine","volume":"27 8","pages":"688-696"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Within family medicine it is generally accepted that the more we know about patients' lives, the better the care we provide. Few studies have sought to quantify this historical assumption. We wondered if knowing their chronic pain, patients' life stories would improve the physician-patient relationship in a family medicine residency training program clinic. Methods: We selected patients in chronic pain with depression and/or anxiety who were considered difficult. After a lead in period to establish stability of ratings, we obtained a life story interview for 125 such patients after administering the doctor-patient relationship questionnaire to them and their physicians. Patients completed the McGill Pain Inventory (MPQ), the Zung Anxiety Inventory, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Physicians completed the Jefferson Physicians Empathy Scale. Questionnaires were repeated every 4 months. Results: The quality of the physician-patient relationship increased significantly over the course of the year for patients (increase of 0.60, standard deviation [SD] = 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57 to 0.63, p < 0.001) and for doctors (increase of 0.77, SD = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.81, p < 0.001). The perceived level of pain on the MPQ decreased significantly on the sensory component (71.2 ± 7.6 to 11.7 + 9.4, 95% CI = 0.589 to 9.411, p = 0.0270 and the affective component (4.2 + 3.4 to 2.1 + 4.3, 95% CI = 0.131 to 4.069, p = 0.037). Anxiety and depression ratings did not change. Physicians' empathy ratings increased significantly over the course of the year from a mean of 117.2 (SD = 10.2) to 125.1 (SD = 16.1) for a difference of 7.90, which was significant at p = 0.0273 with a 95% CI of -14.85 to -0.915. Discussion: Knowing the patient's life story improves the physician-patient relationship for both patients and physicians. When the physician-patient relationship improves, the perceived level of pain decreases. Physicians' empathy ratings increase. While the interview requires 90-120 min, it is billable, and can be done by medical students, medical assistants, social workers, or behavioral health. Conclusions: Obtaining life stories of chronic pain patients is a cost-effective way to reduce pain while simultaneously improving the physician-patient relationship and increasing physician empathy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine: Paradigm, Practice, and Policy Advancing Integrative Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal providing scientific research for the evaluation and integration of complementary and alternative medicine into mainstream medical practice. The Journal delivers original research that directly impacts patient care therapies, protocols, and strategies, ultimately improving the quality of healing.
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine coverage includes:
-Botanical Medicine
-Acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Medicine
-Other Traditional Medicine Practices
-Mind-Body Medicine
-Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
-Integrative Health / Medicine
-Yoga
-Ayurveda
-Naturopathy
-Creative Arts Therapies
-Integrative Whole Systems / Whole Practices
-Homeopathy
-Tai Chi
-Qi Gong
-Massage Therapy
-Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine
-Integrative Cost Studies / Comparative Effectiveness
-Neurostimulation
-Integrative Biophysics