Using SAS/STAT to Understand the NCI Joinpoint Regression Software: Testing for a Zero Slope Using Rates of Drug Overdose Deaths Involving Fentanyl, 2011-2016.

Q2 Medicine
National health statistics reports Pub Date : 2021-06-01
Katherine E Irimata, Donald J Malec, Brigham A Bastian, Merianne R Spencer
{"title":"Using SAS/STAT to Understand the NCI Joinpoint Regression Software: Testing for a Zero Slope Using Rates of Drug Overdose Deaths Involving Fentanyl, 2011-2016.","authors":"Katherine E Irimata,&nbsp;Donald J Malec,&nbsp;Brigham A Bastian,&nbsp;Merianne R Spencer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background-The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Joinpoint regression software is a widely used software program for evaluating trends. In addition to producing model estimates for trend models, this software can search for changes in slope along the trend line. One component of the software, which tests whether line segment slopes are zero, is different from the usual t-test of zero slope that is used in linear models. This report will demonstrate this Joinpoint software procedure through replication using the SAS Institute's statistical software (that is, SAS) and discuss the implications of the different assumptions used by Joinpoint and a typical SAS model for the test of zero slope. Methods-First, Joinpoint's procedure for testing a zero slope is compared with a typical test of zero slope using SAS, and the assumptions behind both approaches are evaluated. Second, the test from the Joinpoint software is replicated in SAS using its PROC REG procedure and additional SAS programming. Trend analyses of rates of drug overdose deaths involving fentanyl from the general population and among females are used as examples. Results-In the evaluation of the trend of drug overdose deaths for the total population, Joinpoint produces a similar result to the linear model test in SAS. For the female subgroup, however, Joinpoint and SAS produce differing results for the test of zero slope. The replication of the Joinpoint test of zero slope using SAS demonstrates that Joinpoint's procedure is based on fewer degrees of freedom, which results in a larger standard error estimate. Conclusion-The Joinpoint approach accounts for the fact that the joinpoints are estimated and thus leads to a more conservative hypothesis test, particularly when the number of points in a trend analysis is small.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 156","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National health statistics reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background-The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Joinpoint regression software is a widely used software program for evaluating trends. In addition to producing model estimates for trend models, this software can search for changes in slope along the trend line. One component of the software, which tests whether line segment slopes are zero, is different from the usual t-test of zero slope that is used in linear models. This report will demonstrate this Joinpoint software procedure through replication using the SAS Institute's statistical software (that is, SAS) and discuss the implications of the different assumptions used by Joinpoint and a typical SAS model for the test of zero slope. Methods-First, Joinpoint's procedure for testing a zero slope is compared with a typical test of zero slope using SAS, and the assumptions behind both approaches are evaluated. Second, the test from the Joinpoint software is replicated in SAS using its PROC REG procedure and additional SAS programming. Trend analyses of rates of drug overdose deaths involving fentanyl from the general population and among females are used as examples. Results-In the evaluation of the trend of drug overdose deaths for the total population, Joinpoint produces a similar result to the linear model test in SAS. For the female subgroup, however, Joinpoint and SAS produce differing results for the test of zero slope. The replication of the Joinpoint test of zero slope using SAS demonstrates that Joinpoint's procedure is based on fewer degrees of freedom, which results in a larger standard error estimate. Conclusion-The Joinpoint approach accounts for the fact that the joinpoints are estimated and thus leads to a more conservative hypothesis test, particularly when the number of points in a trend analysis is small.

使用SAS/STAT理解NCI连接点回归软件:2011-2016年芬太尼类药物过量死亡率零斜率检验。
背景:美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)联合点回归软件是一个广泛使用的评估趋势的软件程序。除了对趋势模型进行模型估计外,该软件还可以沿趋势线搜索斜率的变化。该软件的一个组件测试线段斜率是否为零,与线性模型中使用的通常的零斜率t检验不同。本报告将通过使用SAS研究所的统计软件(即SAS)进行复制来演示Joinpoint软件程序,并讨论Joinpoint和典型SAS模型用于零斜率检验的不同假设的含义。方法:首先,将Joinpoint的零斜率测试过程与使用SAS的典型零斜率测试进行比较,并评估两种方法背后的假设。其次,使用其PROC REG过程和附加的SAS编程在SAS中复制来自Joinpoint软件的测试。本文以一般人群和女性中芬太尼类药物过量死亡率的趋势分析为例。结果-在评估总体人群药物过量死亡趋势时,Joinpoint得出的结果与SAS中的线性模型检验相似。然而,对于女性亚组,Joinpoint和SAS在零斜率测试中产生不同的结果。使用SAS对零斜率的Joinpoint测试的复制表明,Joinpoint的过程基于更少的自由度,这导致了更大的标准误差估计。接合点方法解释了接合点是估计的这一事实,因此导致更保守的假设检验,特别是当趋势分析中的点数较少时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
National health statistics reports
National health statistics reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Notice: Effective January 2008 the title, National Health Statistics Reports (NHSR), replaces Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics (AD). NHSRs will be numbered sequentially beginning with 1. The last AD report number is 395. These reports provide annual data summaries, present analyses of health topics, or present new information on methods or measurement issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信