Chest CT performance and features of COVID-19 in the region of Abu Dhabi, UAE: a single institute study.

Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-17 DOI:10.1007/s42058-021-00075-1
Ghufran Aref Saeed, Abeer Ahmed Al Helali, Asad Shah, Safaa Almazrouei, Luai A Ahmed
{"title":"Chest CT performance and features of COVID-19 in the region of Abu Dhabi, UAE: a single institute study.","authors":"Ghufran Aref Saeed,&nbsp;Abeer Ahmed Al Helali,&nbsp;Asad Shah,&nbsp;Safaa Almazrouei,&nbsp;Luai A Ahmed","doi":"10.1007/s42058-021-00075-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to investigate high-resolution CT features of COVID-19 infection in Abu Dhabi, UAE, and to compare the diagnostic performance of CT scan with RT-PCR test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of consecutive patients who were suspected to have COVID-19 infection and presented to our hospital were collected from March 2, 2020, until April 12, 2020. All patients underwent RT-PCR test; out of which 53.8% had chest CT scan done. Using RT-PCR as a standard reference, the sensitivity and specificity of the CT scan were calculated. We also analyzed the most common imaging findings in patients with positive RT-PCR results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The typical HRCT findings were seen in 50 scans (65.8%) out of total positive ones; 44 (77.2%) with positive RT-PCR results and 6 (31.6%) with negative results. The peripheral disease distribution was seen in 86%, multilobe involvement in 70%, bilateral in 82%, and posterior in 82% of the 50 scans. The ground glass opacities were seen in 50/74 (89.3%) of the positive RT-PCR group. The recognized GGO patterns in these scans were: rounded 50%, linear 38%, and crazy-paving 24%. Using RT-PCR as a standard of reference, chest HRCT scan revealed a sensitivity of 68.8% and specificity of 70%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The commonest HRCT findings in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were peripheral, posterior, bilateral, multilobe rounded ground-glass opacities. The performance of HRCT scan can vary depending on multiple factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10059,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"248-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s42058-021-00075-1","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42058-021-00075-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: We aim to investigate high-resolution CT features of COVID-19 infection in Abu Dhabi, UAE, and to compare the diagnostic performance of CT scan with RT-PCR test.

Methods: Data of consecutive patients who were suspected to have COVID-19 infection and presented to our hospital were collected from March 2, 2020, until April 12, 2020. All patients underwent RT-PCR test; out of which 53.8% had chest CT scan done. Using RT-PCR as a standard reference, the sensitivity and specificity of the CT scan were calculated. We also analyzed the most common imaging findings in patients with positive RT-PCR results.

Results: The typical HRCT findings were seen in 50 scans (65.8%) out of total positive ones; 44 (77.2%) with positive RT-PCR results and 6 (31.6%) with negative results. The peripheral disease distribution was seen in 86%, multilobe involvement in 70%, bilateral in 82%, and posterior in 82% of the 50 scans. The ground glass opacities were seen in 50/74 (89.3%) of the positive RT-PCR group. The recognized GGO patterns in these scans were: rounded 50%, linear 38%, and crazy-paving 24%. Using RT-PCR as a standard of reference, chest HRCT scan revealed a sensitivity of 68.8% and specificity of 70%.

Conclusion: The commonest HRCT findings in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were peripheral, posterior, bilateral, multilobe rounded ground-glass opacities. The performance of HRCT scan can vary depending on multiple factors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

阿联酋阿布扎比地区COVID-19的胸部CT表现和特征:一项单一研究所的研究
目的:探讨阿联酋阿布扎比地区COVID-19感染的高分辨率CT特征,并比较CT扫描与RT-PCR检测的诊断效果。方法:收集2020年3月2日至2020年4月12日在我院连续就诊的疑似COVID-19感染患者的资料。所有患者均行RT-PCR检测;其中53.8%做过胸部CT扫描。以RT-PCR为标准参比,计算CT扫描的敏感性和特异性。我们还分析了RT-PCR阳性患者最常见的影像学表现。结果:典型HRCT表现50例(65.8%);RT-PCR阳性44例(77.2%),阴性6例(31.6%)。在50次扫描中,外周病变分布86%,多叶病变70%,双侧病变82%,后侧病变82%。RT-PCR阳性组50/74(89.3%)可见磨玻璃混浊。在这些扫描中识别出的GGO模式为:圆形50%,线性38%,疯狂铺路24%。以RT-PCR为参照标准,胸部HRCT扫描的敏感性为68.8%,特异性为70%。结论:新型冠状病毒肺炎HRCT最常见的表现为外周性、后侧、双侧、多叶圆形磨玻璃影。HRCT扫描的表现会因多种因素而有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信