[A Forensic Psychiatric Perspective on the Draft Mental Health Act of Turkey in Light of Similar Laws and Practice in a Foreign Jurisdiction].

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Sertaç Ak, Rasim Arıkan
{"title":"[A Forensic Psychiatric Perspective on the Draft Mental Health Act of Turkey in Light of Similar Laws and Practice in a Foreign Jurisdiction].","authors":"Sertaç Ak,&nbsp;Rasim Arıkan","doi":"10.5080/u25472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Designated Acts for issues related to mental health are in force in many countries throughout the world. A mental health act is also expected to be approved in Turkey soon. Under the leadership of the Psychiatric Association of Turkey, non-governmental organizations operating in the field of mental health has contributed to the emergence of a comprehensive draft. The current draft, after extensive discussion and reiterations for almost a decade, was brought to a state close to its final form and accepted as a draft bill, ready to be legislated in the Turkish Grand National Assembly. This review will discuss the potential impact of the law in matters involving Forensic Psychiatry, and present our recommendations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Current draft, which has not yet been finalized, was compared to similar statutes in Massachusetts, USA, and potential benefits and pitfalls were discussed in light of experience with these laws in this jurisdiction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The draft introduces several new concepts and practices which have never existed in Turkey before. It also attempts to organize some of the existing de facto clinical practices in a uniform manner. As a whole, it appears to be in compliance with human rights and related international treaties. However, it is likely that some of the sections might have compliance issues in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this review, we aimed to draw attention to a number of issues, based on our experience in Massachusetts, USA, where similar laws have been in force for a very long time. Rather than literally comparing the statutes in both jurisdictions, we attempted to emphasize positive aspects as well as likely problems that we might encounter should Turkish draft be legislated in the present form.</p>","PeriodicalId":47266,"journal":{"name":"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi","volume":"32 1","pages":"51-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5080/u25472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Designated Acts for issues related to mental health are in force in many countries throughout the world. A mental health act is also expected to be approved in Turkey soon. Under the leadership of the Psychiatric Association of Turkey, non-governmental organizations operating in the field of mental health has contributed to the emergence of a comprehensive draft. The current draft, after extensive discussion and reiterations for almost a decade, was brought to a state close to its final form and accepted as a draft bill, ready to be legislated in the Turkish Grand National Assembly. This review will discuss the potential impact of the law in matters involving Forensic Psychiatry, and present our recommendations.

Method: Current draft, which has not yet been finalized, was compared to similar statutes in Massachusetts, USA, and potential benefits and pitfalls were discussed in light of experience with these laws in this jurisdiction.

Results: The draft introduces several new concepts and practices which have never existed in Turkey before. It also attempts to organize some of the existing de facto clinical practices in a uniform manner. As a whole, it appears to be in compliance with human rights and related international treaties. However, it is likely that some of the sections might have compliance issues in daily practice.

Conclusion: In this review, we aimed to draw attention to a number of issues, based on our experience in Massachusetts, USA, where similar laws have been in force for a very long time. Rather than literally comparing the statutes in both jurisdictions, we attempted to emphasize positive aspects as well as likely problems that we might encounter should Turkish draft be legislated in the present form.

[根据外国司法管辖区类似法律和惯例从法医精神病学角度看土耳其精神卫生法草案]。
目标:世界上许多国家都实施了与心理健康有关的指定法案。土耳其也有望很快通过一项心理健康法案。在土耳其精神病学协会的领导下,在精神健康领域开展工作的非政府组织为起草一份全面草案作出了贡献。目前的草案经过近十年的广泛讨论和重申,已接近最终形式,并被接受为一项法案草案,准备在土耳其大国民议会立法。本综述将讨论法律在涉及法医精神病学的问题上的潜在影响,并提出我们的建议。方法:目前的草案尚未最终确定,与美国马萨诸塞州的类似法规进行了比较,并根据该司法管辖区这些法律的经验讨论了潜在的好处和缺陷。结果:该草案引入了土耳其以前从未存在过的几个新概念和做法。它还试图以统一的方式组织一些现有的事实上的临床实践。总的来说,它似乎符合人权和有关的国际条约。然而,在日常实践中,某些部分可能存在遵从性问题。结论:在这次审查中,我们的目的是提请注意一些问题,根据我们在马萨诸塞州的经验,美国,类似的法律已经生效了很长一段时间。我们不是从字面上比较两个司法管辖区的法规,而是试图强调积极的方面,以及如果土耳其草案以目前的形式立法,我们可能遇到的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信