Perception of COVID-19 Threats among Individuals from Different Countries: A Survey.

Ibrahim Ethem Gurbuz, Hema Sekhar Reddy Rajula, Halil Koca, Vedat Karadeniz, Vassilios Fanos
{"title":"Perception of COVID-19 Threats among Individuals from Different Countries: A Survey.","authors":"Ibrahim Ethem Gurbuz,&nbsp;Hema Sekhar Reddy Rajula,&nbsp;Halil Koca,&nbsp;Vedat Karadeniz,&nbsp;Vassilios Fanos","doi":"10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim is to discover the perceptions of individuals living in different countries relating to Covid-19 and develop a joint initiative against this virus and future outbreaks by making comparisons over a number of sociological factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional research design was applied, which is a type of descriptive survey belonging to quantitative research. The sample was selected from various countries: Turkey, USA, France, Germany, Netherlands, Georgia, India, and South Africa. The total number of participants is 1020 people. The data were provided through the One-Way Anova Test and collected based on \"The Covid-19 Perception Questionnaire\" which contained 5 personal information and 10 items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that statistically significant differences among the Covid-19 perceptions of individuals. The effect size showed that this difference is at a large level. As the variances did not evenly distribute, the Dunnett C multiple comparison tests were applied. According to this, the highest mean in Georgia and India, the lowest mean in Germany and the USA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority have the national and international awareness required to cope with the pandemic. However, the source of the virus has still not been explained so it has been observed that the number of people who believe in conspiracy theories is also high. As a result, people need more reliable sources of information, especially the World Health Organization should make more precise explanations to people about the origin of Covid-19 and updated information should be made available to people constantly. In addition, although a long time passed after the appearance of the Covid-19, people are still confused.</p>","PeriodicalId":517142,"journal":{"name":"The Eurasian Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Eurasian Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim is to discover the perceptions of individuals living in different countries relating to Covid-19 and develop a joint initiative against this virus and future outbreaks by making comparisons over a number of sociological factors.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional research design was applied, which is a type of descriptive survey belonging to quantitative research. The sample was selected from various countries: Turkey, USA, France, Germany, Netherlands, Georgia, India, and South Africa. The total number of participants is 1020 people. The data were provided through the One-Way Anova Test and collected based on "The Covid-19 Perception Questionnaire" which contained 5 personal information and 10 items.

Results: We found that statistically significant differences among the Covid-19 perceptions of individuals. The effect size showed that this difference is at a large level. As the variances did not evenly distribute, the Dunnett C multiple comparison tests were applied. According to this, the highest mean in Georgia and India, the lowest mean in Germany and the USA.

Conclusion: The majority have the national and international awareness required to cope with the pandemic. However, the source of the virus has still not been explained so it has been observed that the number of people who believe in conspiracy theories is also high. As a result, people need more reliable sources of information, especially the World Health Organization should make more precise explanations to people about the origin of Covid-19 and updated information should be made available to people constantly. In addition, although a long time passed after the appearance of the Covid-19, people are still confused.

Abstract Image

来自不同国家的个人对COVID-19威胁的看法:一项调查。
目的:目的是通过对一些社会学因素进行比较,发现生活在不同国家的个人对Covid-19的看法,并制定一项针对该病毒和未来疫情的联合倡议。材料与方法:采用横断面研究设计,属于定量研究中的一种描述性调查。样本来自不同的国家:土耳其、美国、法国、德国、荷兰、格鲁吉亚、印度和南非。总人数为1020人。数据通过单因素方差分析(One-Way Anova Test)提供,并基于包含5个个人信息和10个项目的“新冠肺炎感知问卷”收集。结果:我们发现个体对Covid-19的认知存在统计学上的显著差异。效应量表明,这种差异是在很大的水平上。由于方差分布不均匀,采用Dunnett C多重比较检验。据此,格鲁吉亚和印度的平均值最高,德国和美国的平均值最低。结论:大多数人具有应对大流行病所需的国家和国际意识。但是,由于病毒的来源仍然没有得到解释,因此人们观察到相信阴谋论的人数也很多。因此,人们需要更可靠的信息来源,特别是世界卫生组织应该向人们更准确地解释Covid-19的来源,并不断向人们提供最新信息。此外,虽然新冠病毒出现后很长时间过去了,但人们仍然感到困惑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信