Comparing Computed Tomography-Derived Augmented Reality Holograms to a Standard Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Viewer for Presurgical Planning: Feasibility Study.

David Dallas-Orr, Yordan Penev, Robert Schultz, Jesse Courtier
{"title":"Comparing Computed Tomography-Derived Augmented Reality Holograms to a Standard Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Viewer for Presurgical Planning: Feasibility Study.","authors":"David Dallas-Orr,&nbsp;Yordan Penev,&nbsp;Robert Schultz,&nbsp;Jesse Courtier","doi":"10.2196/18367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are ubiquitously used to store, share, and view radiological information for preoperative planning across surgical specialties. Although traditional PACS software has proven reliable in terms of display accuracy and ease of use, it remains limited by its inherent representation of medical imaging in 2 dimensions. Augmented reality (AR) systems present an exciting opportunity to complement traditional PACS capabilities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the technical feasibility of using a novel AR platform, with holograms derived from computed tomography (CT) imaging, as a supplement to traditional PACS for presurgical planning in complex surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Independent readers measured objects of predetermined, anthropomorphically correlated sizes using the circumference and angle tools of standard-of-care PACS software and a newly developed augmented reality presurgical planning system (ARPPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Measurements taken with the standard PACS and the ARPPS showed no statistically significant differences. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.08% (95% CI -4.20% to 4.36%) for measurements taken with PACS versus ARPPS' circumference tools and -1.84% (95% CI -6.17% to 2.14%) for measurements with the systems' angle tools. Lin's concordance correlation coefficients were 1.00 and 0.98 for the circumference and angle measurements, respectively, indicating almost perfect strength of agreement between ARPPS and PACS. Intraclass correlation showed no statistically significant difference between the readers for either measurement tool on each system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ARPPS can be an effective, accurate, and precise means of 3D visualization and measurement of CT-derived holograms in the presurgical care timeline.</p>","PeriodicalId":73557,"journal":{"name":"JMIR perioperative medicine","volume":"3 2","pages":"e18367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709855/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR perioperative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/18367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are ubiquitously used to store, share, and view radiological information for preoperative planning across surgical specialties. Although traditional PACS software has proven reliable in terms of display accuracy and ease of use, it remains limited by its inherent representation of medical imaging in 2 dimensions. Augmented reality (AR) systems present an exciting opportunity to complement traditional PACS capabilities.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the technical feasibility of using a novel AR platform, with holograms derived from computed tomography (CT) imaging, as a supplement to traditional PACS for presurgical planning in complex surgical procedures.

Methods: Independent readers measured objects of predetermined, anthropomorphically correlated sizes using the circumference and angle tools of standard-of-care PACS software and a newly developed augmented reality presurgical planning system (ARPPS).

Results: Measurements taken with the standard PACS and the ARPPS showed no statistically significant differences. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.08% (95% CI -4.20% to 4.36%) for measurements taken with PACS versus ARPPS' circumference tools and -1.84% (95% CI -6.17% to 2.14%) for measurements with the systems' angle tools. Lin's concordance correlation coefficients were 1.00 and 0.98 for the circumference and angle measurements, respectively, indicating almost perfect strength of agreement between ARPPS and PACS. Intraclass correlation showed no statistically significant difference between the readers for either measurement tool on each system.

Conclusions: ARPPS can be an effective, accurate, and precise means of 3D visualization and measurement of CT-derived holograms in the presurgical care timeline.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

比较计算机层析成像衍生的增强现实全息图与标准图像存档和通信系统查看器的术前规划:可行性研究。
背景:图像存档和通信系统(PACS)被广泛用于存储、共享和查看跨外科专业术前规划的放射信息。尽管传统的PACS软件在显示准确性和易用性方面已经被证明是可靠的,但它仍然受到其固有的二维医学图像表示的限制。增强现实(AR)系统为补充传统PACS功能提供了一个令人兴奋的机会。目的:本研究旨在评估一种新型AR平台的技术可行性,该平台结合计算机断层扫描(CT)成像的全息图,作为传统PACS的补充,用于复杂外科手术的术前规划。方法:使用标准护理PACS软件和新开发的增强现实术前计划系统(ARPPS)的周长和角度工具,独立阅读器测量预定的拟人化相关尺寸的物体。结果:标准PACS与ARPPS测量结果差异无统计学意义。Bland-Altman分析显示,PACS与ARPPS的周长工具测量的平均差异为0.08% (95% CI -4.20%至4.36%),而系统角度工具测量的平均差异为-1.84% (95% CI -6.17%至2.14%)。周长和角度的Lin’s一致性相关系数分别为1.00和0.98,表明ARPPS和PACS之间的一致性几乎是完美的。类内相关性显示,在每个系统上使用任何测量工具的读者之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:ARPPS是一种有效、准确和精确的方法,可以在术前护理时间线中对ct衍生全息图进行三维可视化和测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信