Physical Activity and Insulin Resistance in 6,500 NHANES Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity.

IF 3.8 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of Obesity Pub Date : 2020-03-26 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/3848256
James R Fowler, Larry A Tucker, Bruce W Bailey, James D LeCheminant
{"title":"Physical Activity and Insulin Resistance in 6,500 NHANES Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity.","authors":"James R Fowler,&nbsp;Larry A Tucker,&nbsp;Bruce W Bailey,&nbsp;James D LeCheminant","doi":"10.1155/2020/3848256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional investigation studied differences in insulin resistance across levels of physical activity in 6,500 US adults who were randomly selected as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Another important objective was to determine the influence of abdominal obesity on the physical activity and insulin resistance relationship. MET-minutes were utilized to quantify total activity based on participation in 48 different physical activities. Two strategies were employed to categorize levels of physical activity: one was based on relative MET-minutes (quartiles), and the other approach was based on the US physical activity guidelines. Insulin resistance was indexed using the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA). Abdominal obesity was indexed using waist circumference. Effect modification was tested by dividing waist circumferences into sex-specific quartiles and then evaluating the relationship between physical activity and HOMA-IR within each quartile separately. Results showed that relative physical activity level was associated with HOMA-IR after controlling for demographic and demographic and lifestyle covariates (<i>F</i> = 11.5, <i>P</i> < 0.0001 and <i>F</i> = 6.0, <i>P</i>=0.0012, respectively). Adjusting for demographic and demographic and lifestyle covariates also resulted in significant relationships between guideline-based activity and HOMA-IR (<i>F</i> = 8.0, <i>P</i> < 0.0001 and <i>F</i> = 4.9, <i>P</i>=0.0017, respectively). However, statistically controlling for differences in waist circumference with the other covariates nullified the relationship between total physical activity and HOMA-IR. Effect modification testing showed that when the sample was delimited to adults with abdominal obesity (Quartile 4), relative (<i>F</i> = 5.6, <i>P</i>=0.0019) and guideline-based physical activity (<i>F</i> = 3.7, <i>P</i>=0.0098) and HOMA-IR were significantly associated. Physical activity and HOMA-IR were not related within the other three quartiles. In conclusion, it appears that differences in physical activity may play a meaningful role in insulin resistance in those with abdominal obesity, but total activity does not seem to account for differences in insulin resistance among US adults with smaller waists.</p>","PeriodicalId":16628,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obesity","volume":"2020 ","pages":"3848256"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/3848256","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3848256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This cross-sectional investigation studied differences in insulin resistance across levels of physical activity in 6,500 US adults who were randomly selected as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Another important objective was to determine the influence of abdominal obesity on the physical activity and insulin resistance relationship. MET-minutes were utilized to quantify total activity based on participation in 48 different physical activities. Two strategies were employed to categorize levels of physical activity: one was based on relative MET-minutes (quartiles), and the other approach was based on the US physical activity guidelines. Insulin resistance was indexed using the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA). Abdominal obesity was indexed using waist circumference. Effect modification was tested by dividing waist circumferences into sex-specific quartiles and then evaluating the relationship between physical activity and HOMA-IR within each quartile separately. Results showed that relative physical activity level was associated with HOMA-IR after controlling for demographic and demographic and lifestyle covariates (F = 11.5, P < 0.0001 and F = 6.0, P=0.0012, respectively). Adjusting for demographic and demographic and lifestyle covariates also resulted in significant relationships between guideline-based activity and HOMA-IR (F = 8.0, P < 0.0001 and F = 4.9, P=0.0017, respectively). However, statistically controlling for differences in waist circumference with the other covariates nullified the relationship between total physical activity and HOMA-IR. Effect modification testing showed that when the sample was delimited to adults with abdominal obesity (Quartile 4), relative (F = 5.6, P=0.0019) and guideline-based physical activity (F = 3.7, P=0.0098) and HOMA-IR were significantly associated. Physical activity and HOMA-IR were not related within the other three quartiles. In conclusion, it appears that differences in physical activity may play a meaningful role in insulin resistance in those with abdominal obesity, but total activity does not seem to account for differences in insulin resistance among US adults with smaller waists.

6500名NHANES成年人的体力活动和胰岛素抵抗:腹部肥胖的作用。
这项横断面调查研究了6500名美国成年人在不同体力活动水平下胰岛素抵抗的差异,这些成年人是随机选择的,作为国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的一部分。另一个重要目的是确定腹部肥胖对身体活动和胰岛素抵抗的影响。met分钟被用来量化基于48种不同体育活动的总活动量。采用了两种策略来对身体活动水平进行分类:一种是基于相对met分钟(四分位数),另一种是基于美国身体活动指南。使用稳态模型评估(HOMA)对胰岛素抵抗进行索引。腹部肥胖以腰围为指标。通过将腰围分为性别特异性四分位数,然后在每个四分位数内分别评估体力活动与HOMA-IR之间的关系,来检验效果的改变。结果显示,在控制人口统计学、人口统计学和生活方式协变量后,相对体力活动水平与HOMA-IR相关(F = 11.5, P < 0.0001和F = 6.0, P=0.0012)。调整人口统计学、人口统计学和生活方式协变量也导致基于指南的活动与HOMA-IR之间存在显著关系(分别为F = 8.0, P < 0.0001和F = 4.9, P=0.0017)。然而,在统计上控制腰围与其他协变量的差异,使总体力活动与HOMA-IR之间的关系无效。效应修正检验显示,当样本被划分为腹部肥胖的成年人(四分位数4)时,相对(F = 5.6, P=0.0019)和基于指南的体力活动(F = 3.7, P=0.0098)与HOMA-IR显著相关。体力活动和HOMA-IR在其他三个四分位数内没有相关性。总之,体力活动的差异可能在腹部肥胖患者的胰岛素抵抗中发挥重要作用,但总运动量似乎并不能解释美国腰围较小的成年人胰岛素抵抗的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Obesity
Journal of Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Obesity is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a multidisciplinary forum for basic and clinical research as well as applied studies in the areas of adipocyte biology & physiology, lipid metabolism, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, paediatric obesity, genetics, behavioural epidemiology, nutrition & eating disorders, exercise & human physiology, weight control and health risks associated with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信