Specimen oriented intraoperative margin assessment in oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

IF 2.2
P Horwich, C MacKay, M Bullock, S M Taylor, R Hart, J Trites, L Geldenhuys, B Williams, M H Rigby
{"title":"Specimen oriented intraoperative margin assessment in oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"P Horwich, C MacKay, M Bullock, S M Taylor, R Hart, J Trites, L Geldenhuys, B Williams, M H Rigby","doi":"10.1186/s40463-021-00501-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the oncologic outcomes and cost analysis of transitioning to a specimen oriented intraoperative margin assessment protocol from a tumour bed sampling protocol in oral cavity (OCSCC) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series and subsequent prospective cohort study SETTING: Tertiary care academic teaching hospital SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Retrospective case series of all institutional T1-T2 OCSCC or OPSCC treated with primary surgery between January 1st 2009 - December 31st 2014. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates with log rank tests were used to compare patients based on final margin status. Cost analysis was performed for escalation of therapy due to positive final margins. Following introduction of a specimen derived margin protocol, successive prospective cohort study of T1-T4 OCSCC or OPSCC treated with primary surgery from January 1st 2017 - December 31st 2018. Analysis and comparison of both protocols included review of intraoperative margins, final pathology and treatment cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of our intra-operative tumour bed frozen section protocol revealed 15 of 116 (12.9%) patients had positive final pathology margins, resulting in post-operative escalation of therapy for 14/15 patients in the form of re-resection (7/14), radiation therapy (6/14) and chemoradiotherapy (1/14). One other patient with positive final margins received escalated therapy for additional negative prognostic factors. Recurrence free survival at 3 years was 88.4 and 50.7% for negative and positive final margins respectively (p = 0.048). Implementation of a specimen oriented frozen section protocol resulted in 1 of 111 patients (0.9%) having positive final pathology margins, a statistically significant decrease (p < 0.001). Utilizing our specimen oriented protocol, there was an absolute risk reduction for having a final positive margin of 12.0% and relative risk reduction of 93.0%. Estimated cost avoidance applying the specimen oriented protocol to our previous cohort was $412,052.812017 CAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a specimen oriented intraoperative margin protocol provides a statistically significant decrease in final positive margins. This change in protocol leads to decreased patient morbidity by avoiding therapy escalation attributable only to positive margins, and avoids the economic costs of these treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":520683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","volume":" ","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00501-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the oncologic outcomes and cost analysis of transitioning to a specimen oriented intraoperative margin assessment protocol from a tumour bed sampling protocol in oral cavity (OCSCC) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

Study design: Retrospective case series and subsequent prospective cohort study SETTING: Tertiary care academic teaching hospital SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Retrospective case series of all institutional T1-T2 OCSCC or OPSCC treated with primary surgery between January 1st 2009 - December 31st 2014. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates with log rank tests were used to compare patients based on final margin status. Cost analysis was performed for escalation of therapy due to positive final margins. Following introduction of a specimen derived margin protocol, successive prospective cohort study of T1-T4 OCSCC or OPSCC treated with primary surgery from January 1st 2017 - December 31st 2018. Analysis and comparison of both protocols included review of intraoperative margins, final pathology and treatment cost.

Results: Analysis of our intra-operative tumour bed frozen section protocol revealed 15 of 116 (12.9%) patients had positive final pathology margins, resulting in post-operative escalation of therapy for 14/15 patients in the form of re-resection (7/14), radiation therapy (6/14) and chemoradiotherapy (1/14). One other patient with positive final margins received escalated therapy for additional negative prognostic factors. Recurrence free survival at 3 years was 88.4 and 50.7% for negative and positive final margins respectively (p = 0.048). Implementation of a specimen oriented frozen section protocol resulted in 1 of 111 patients (0.9%) having positive final pathology margins, a statistically significant decrease (p < 0.001). Utilizing our specimen oriented protocol, there was an absolute risk reduction for having a final positive margin of 12.0% and relative risk reduction of 93.0%. Estimated cost avoidance applying the specimen oriented protocol to our previous cohort was $412,052.812017 CAD.

Conclusion: Implementation of a specimen oriented intraoperative margin protocol provides a statistically significant decrease in final positive margins. This change in protocol leads to decreased patient morbidity by avoiding therapy escalation attributable only to positive margins, and avoids the economic costs of these treatments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

口腔及口咽鳞状细胞癌术中边缘标本评估。
目的:评估从口腔(OCSCC)和口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)的肿瘤床取样方案过渡到以标本为导向的术中边缘评估方案的肿瘤学结果和成本分析。研究设计:回顾性病例系列和随后的前瞻性队列研究设置:三级医疗学术教学医院研究对象和方法:2009年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间所有机构T1-T2 OCSCC或OPSCC接受原发性手术治疗的回顾性病例系列。Kaplan-Meier生存估计和log rank检验用于比较基于最终边缘状态的患者。由于最终利润为正,对治疗的升级进行了成本分析。在引入标本衍生切缘方案后,从2017年1月1日至2018年12月31日,对首次手术治疗的T1-T4 OCSCC或OPSCC进行了连续前瞻性队列研究。两种方案的分析和比较包括术中边缘、最终病理和治疗费用的回顾。结果:我们术中肿瘤床冰冻切片方案分析显示116例患者中有15例(12.9%)最终病理边缘呈阳性,导致14/15例患者术后升级治疗,包括再切除(7/14)、放射治疗(6/14)和放化疗(1/14)。另一名最终切缘阳性的患者因其他负面预后因素接受了升级治疗。3年无复发生存率为阴性和阳性,分别为88.4和50.7% (p = 0.048)。实施标本导向冷冻切片方案导致111例患者中有1例(0.9%)最终病理边缘呈阳性,统计学上显著减少(p结论:实施标本导向术中边缘方案可显著减少最终阳性边缘。这种方案的改变通过避免仅归因于正边际的治疗升级导致患者发病率降低,并避免了这些治疗的经济成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书