Increased Healthcare Utilization and Expenditures Associated With Chronic Opioid Therapy.

American journal of accountable care Pub Date : 2018-12-01 Epub Date: 2018-12-05
Douglas Thornton, Nilanjana Dwibedi, Virginia Scott, Charles D Ponte, X I Tan, Douglas Ziedonis, Usha Sambamoorthi
{"title":"Increased Healthcare Utilization and Expenditures Associated With Chronic Opioid Therapy.","authors":"Douglas Thornton,&nbsp;Nilanjana Dwibedi,&nbsp;Virginia Scott,&nbsp;Charles D Ponte,&nbsp;X I Tan,&nbsp;Douglas Ziedonis,&nbsp;Usha Sambamoorthi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the association of the transition from incident opioid use to incident chronic opioid therapy (COT) with the trajectories of healthcare utilization and expenditures.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We used a longitudinal, retrospective cohort design, including seven 120-day time periods covering preindex (t<sub>1</sub>, t<sub>2</sub>, and t<sub>3</sub>), index (t<sub>4</sub>), and postindex (t<sub>5</sub>, t<sub>6</sub>, and t<sub>7</sub>) periods with data from adults aged 28 to 63 years at the index date, without cancer, and continuously enrolled in a primary commercial insurance plan (N = 20,201).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariable analyses were performed on utilization (population-averaged [PA] logistic regression), expenditures (PA generalized estimating equations), and expenditure estimates (counterfactual prediction). The data used were from a commercial claims database (10% random sample from the IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims - US database) from 2006-2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients on COT were more likely to use inpatient services (adjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21) compared with those who did not. Although expenditures peaked during the index period (t<sub>4</sub>) for all users, differences in unadjusted average 120-day expenditures between COT and non-COT users were highest in t<sub>4</sub> for total ($4607) and inpatient ($2453) expenditures. COT users had significantly higher total (β = 0.183; <i>P</i> <.01) and inpatient (β = 0.448; <i>P</i> <.001) expenditures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The period after incident opioid prescription but before transition to COT is an important time for payers to intervene.</p>","PeriodicalId":72160,"journal":{"name":"American journal of accountable care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8194048/pdf/nihms-1704648.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of accountable care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the association of the transition from incident opioid use to incident chronic opioid therapy (COT) with the trajectories of healthcare utilization and expenditures.

Study design: We used a longitudinal, retrospective cohort design, including seven 120-day time periods covering preindex (t1, t2, and t3), index (t4), and postindex (t5, t6, and t7) periods with data from adults aged 28 to 63 years at the index date, without cancer, and continuously enrolled in a primary commercial insurance plan (N = 20,201).

Methods: Multivariable analyses were performed on utilization (population-averaged [PA] logistic regression), expenditures (PA generalized estimating equations), and expenditure estimates (counterfactual prediction). The data used were from a commercial claims database (10% random sample from the IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims - US database) from 2006-2015.

Results: Patients on COT were more likely to use inpatient services (adjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21) compared with those who did not. Although expenditures peaked during the index period (t4) for all users, differences in unadjusted average 120-day expenditures between COT and non-COT users were highest in t4 for total ($4607) and inpatient ($2453) expenditures. COT users had significantly higher total (β = 0.183; P <.01) and inpatient (β = 0.448; P <.001) expenditures.

Conclusions: The period after incident opioid prescription but before transition to COT is an important time for payers to intervene.

Abstract Image

与慢性阿片类药物治疗相关的医疗保健利用和支出增加。
目的:评估从偶发阿片类药物使用到偶发慢性阿片类药物治疗(COT)的转变与医疗保健利用和支出轨迹的关系。研究设计:我们采用纵向、回顾性队列设计,包括指数前(t1、t2和t3)、指数后(t4)和指数后(t5、t6和t7) 7个120天的时间段,数据来自指数日28至63岁、无癌症、持续参加初级商业保险计划的成年人(N = 20,201)。方法:对利用率(人口平均[PA]逻辑回归)、支出(PA广义估计方程)和支出估计(反事实预测)进行多变量分析。使用的数据来自2006-2015年的商业索赔数据库(10%随机样本来自IQVIA真实世界数据裁决索赔-美国数据库)。结果:COT患者更倾向于使用住院服务(调整优势比为1.11;95% CI, 1.01-1.21)。尽管所有用户的支出在指数期(t4)达到峰值,但COT和非COT用户之间未经调整的平均120天支出差异在t4达到最高,总支出(4607美元)和住院支出(2453美元)。COT使用者的总得分显著高于对照组(β = 0.183;结论:阿片类药物处方后过渡到COT前的一段时间是支付者干预的重要时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信