PICU Follow-Up Clinic: Patient and Family Outcomes 2 Months After Discharge.

Laurence Ducharme-Crevier, Kim-Anh La, Tine Francois, George Gerardis, Miriam Beauchamp, Karen Harrington, Nadezdha Roumeliotis, Catherine Farrell, Baruch Toledano, Jacques Lacroix, Geneviève Du Pont-Thibodeau
{"title":"PICU Follow-Up Clinic: Patient and Family Outcomes 2 Months After Discharge.","authors":"Laurence Ducharme-Crevier, Kim-Anh La, Tine Francois, George Gerardis, Miriam Beauchamp, Karen Harrington, Nadezdha Roumeliotis, Catherine Farrell, Baruch Toledano, Jacques Lacroix, Geneviève Du Pont-Thibodeau","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000002789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: Hospitalization in a PICU is a life-altering experience for children and their families. Yet, little is known about the well-being of these children after their discharge. We are describing the outcome of PICU survivors at a PICU clinic 2 months after discharge. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: PICU and PICU clinic of CHU Sainte-Justine. PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of children admitted for greater than or equal to 4 days, greater than or equal to 2 days of invasive ventilation, odds ratio greater than or equal to 4 days of noninvasive ventilation at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine. PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of children admitted for greater than or equal to 4 days, greater than or equal to 2 days of invasive ventilation, or greater than or equal to 4 days of noninvasive ventilation at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine PICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were evaluated by a pediatric intensivist 2 months after discharge at the follow-up clinic. They were asked to fill out validated questionnaires. One hundred thirty-two patients were followed from October 2018 to September 2020. The PICU diagnoses were respiratory illness (40.9%), head trauma, and septic shock (7.6%). Average length of PICU stay was 28.5 ± 84.2 days (median 7 d). Sixty-one percent were intubated. Symptoms reported by families were as follows: fatigue (9.9%), sleep disturbances (20.5%), feeding difficulties (12.1%), and voice change and/or stridor (9.8%). Twenty-one percent of school-aged children reported school delays. Twenty-seven children demonstrated communication delays, 45% gross motor function delays, 41% fine motor delays, 37% delays in problem-solving, and 49% delays in personal-social functioning. Quality of Life scores were 78.1 ± 20.5 and 80.0 ± 17.5 for physical and psychosocial aspects, respectively. Fourteen percent of parents reported financial difficulties, 42% reported symptoms of anxiety, 29% symptoms of depression. CONCLUSIONS: PICU survivors and their families experience significant physical and psychosocial morbidities after their critical illness. PICU follow-up is crucial to determine the outcome of these children and develop interventions.","PeriodicalId":520744,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies","volume":" ","pages":"935-943"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hospitalization in a PICU is a life-altering experience for children and their families. Yet, little is known about the well-being of these children after their discharge. We are describing the outcome of PICU survivors at a PICU clinic 2 months after discharge. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: PICU and PICU clinic of CHU Sainte-Justine. PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of children admitted for greater than or equal to 4 days, greater than or equal to 2 days of invasive ventilation, odds ratio greater than or equal to 4 days of noninvasive ventilation at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine. PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of children admitted for greater than or equal to 4 days, greater than or equal to 2 days of invasive ventilation, or greater than or equal to 4 days of noninvasive ventilation at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine PICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were evaluated by a pediatric intensivist 2 months after discharge at the follow-up clinic. They were asked to fill out validated questionnaires. One hundred thirty-two patients were followed from October 2018 to September 2020. The PICU diagnoses were respiratory illness (40.9%), head trauma, and septic shock (7.6%). Average length of PICU stay was 28.5 ± 84.2 days (median 7 d). Sixty-one percent were intubated. Symptoms reported by families were as follows: fatigue (9.9%), sleep disturbances (20.5%), feeding difficulties (12.1%), and voice change and/or stridor (9.8%). Twenty-one percent of school-aged children reported school delays. Twenty-seven children demonstrated communication delays, 45% gross motor function delays, 41% fine motor delays, 37% delays in problem-solving, and 49% delays in personal-social functioning. Quality of Life scores were 78.1 ± 20.5 and 80.0 ± 17.5 for physical and psychosocial aspects, respectively. Fourteen percent of parents reported financial difficulties, 42% reported symptoms of anxiety, 29% symptoms of depression. CONCLUSIONS: PICU survivors and their families experience significant physical and psychosocial morbidities after their critical illness. PICU follow-up is crucial to determine the outcome of these children and develop interventions.
PICU随访临床:出院后2个月患者及家属结果。
目的:对儿童及其家庭来说,PICU的住院是一种改变生活的经历。然而,人们对这些儿童出院后的健康状况知之甚少。我们描述PICU幸存者出院后2个月在PICU诊所的结果。设计:前瞻性队列研究。地点:朱氏医院PICU及PICU门诊。患者:在圣贾斯汀大学医院中心住院≥4天、≥2天有创通气、≥4天无创通气的优势比儿童的前瞻性队列研究。患者:在圣贾斯汀大学医院中心PICU接受大于等于4天、大于等于2天有创通气或大于等于4天无创通气的儿童的前瞻性队列研究。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:患者出院后2个月在随访诊所由儿科重症医师进行评估。他们被要求填写有效的问卷。2018年10月至2020年9月对132例患者进行随访。PICU诊断为呼吸系统疾病(40.9%)、头部创伤和感染性休克(7.6%)。PICU平均住院时间28.5±84.2天(中位7天),61%插管。家庭报告的症状如下:疲劳(9.9%)、睡眠障碍(20.5%)、进食困难(12.1%)、声音改变和/或喘鸣(9.8%)。21%的学龄儿童报告上学延误。27名儿童表现出沟通迟缓,45%表现为大运动功能迟缓,41%表现为精细运动迟缓,37%表现为问题解决迟缓,49%表现为个人社会功能迟缓。生理和心理方面的生活质量得分分别为78.1±20.5分和80.0±17.5分。14%的父母报告经济困难,42%的父母报告焦虑症状,29%的父母报告抑郁症状。结论:重症监护病房幸存者及其家属在重症后经历了显著的生理和心理疾病。PICU随访对于确定这些儿童的预后和制定干预措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信