Laurence Ducharme-Crevier, Kim-Anh La, Tine Francois, George Gerardis, Miriam Beauchamp, Karen Harrington, Nadezdha Roumeliotis, Catherine Farrell, Baruch Toledano, Jacques Lacroix, Geneviève Du Pont-Thibodeau
{"title":"PICU Follow-Up Clinic: Patient and Family Outcomes 2 Months After Discharge.","authors":"Laurence Ducharme-Crevier, Kim-Anh La, Tine Francois, George Gerardis, Miriam Beauchamp, Karen Harrington, Nadezdha Roumeliotis, Catherine Farrell, Baruch Toledano, Jacques Lacroix, Geneviève Du Pont-Thibodeau","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000002789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: Hospitalization in a PICU is a life-altering experience for children and their families. Yet, little is known about the well-being of these children after their discharge. We are describing the outcome of PICU survivors at a PICU clinic 2 months after discharge. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: PICU and PICU clinic of CHU Sainte-Justine. PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of children admitted for greater than or equal to 4 days, greater than or equal to 2 days of invasive ventilation, odds ratio greater than or equal to 4 days of noninvasive ventilation at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine. PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of children admitted for greater than or equal to 4 days, greater than or equal to 2 days of invasive ventilation, or greater than or equal to 4 days of noninvasive ventilation at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine PICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were evaluated by a pediatric intensivist 2 months after discharge at the follow-up clinic. They were asked to fill out validated questionnaires. One hundred thirty-two patients were followed from October 2018 to September 2020. The PICU diagnoses were respiratory illness (40.9%), head trauma, and septic shock (7.6%). Average length of PICU stay was 28.5 ± 84.2 days (median 7 d). Sixty-one percent were intubated. Symptoms reported by families were as follows: fatigue (9.9%), sleep disturbances (20.5%), feeding difficulties (12.1%), and voice change and/or stridor (9.8%). Twenty-one percent of school-aged children reported school delays. Twenty-seven children demonstrated communication delays, 45% gross motor function delays, 41% fine motor delays, 37% delays in problem-solving, and 49% delays in personal-social functioning. Quality of Life scores were 78.1 ± 20.5 and 80.0 ± 17.5 for physical and psychosocial aspects, respectively. Fourteen percent of parents reported financial difficulties, 42% reported symptoms of anxiety, 29% symptoms of depression. CONCLUSIONS: PICU survivors and their families experience significant physical and psychosocial morbidities after their critical illness. PICU follow-up is crucial to determine the outcome of these children and develop interventions.","PeriodicalId":520744,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies","volume":" ","pages":"935-943"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Hospitalization in a PICU is a life-altering experience for children and their families. Yet, little is known about the well-being of these children after their discharge. We are describing the outcome of PICU survivors at a PICU clinic 2 months after discharge. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: PICU and PICU clinic of CHU Sainte-Justine. PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of children admitted for greater than or equal to 4 days, greater than or equal to 2 days of invasive ventilation, odds ratio greater than or equal to 4 days of noninvasive ventilation at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine. PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of children admitted for greater than or equal to 4 days, greater than or equal to 2 days of invasive ventilation, or greater than or equal to 4 days of noninvasive ventilation at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine PICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were evaluated by a pediatric intensivist 2 months after discharge at the follow-up clinic. They were asked to fill out validated questionnaires. One hundred thirty-two patients were followed from October 2018 to September 2020. The PICU diagnoses were respiratory illness (40.9%), head trauma, and septic shock (7.6%). Average length of PICU stay was 28.5 ± 84.2 days (median 7 d). Sixty-one percent were intubated. Symptoms reported by families were as follows: fatigue (9.9%), sleep disturbances (20.5%), feeding difficulties (12.1%), and voice change and/or stridor (9.8%). Twenty-one percent of school-aged children reported school delays. Twenty-seven children demonstrated communication delays, 45% gross motor function delays, 41% fine motor delays, 37% delays in problem-solving, and 49% delays in personal-social functioning. Quality of Life scores were 78.1 ± 20.5 and 80.0 ± 17.5 for physical and psychosocial aspects, respectively. Fourteen percent of parents reported financial difficulties, 42% reported symptoms of anxiety, 29% symptoms of depression. CONCLUSIONS: PICU survivors and their families experience significant physical and psychosocial morbidities after their critical illness. PICU follow-up is crucial to determine the outcome of these children and develop interventions.