The Evolving Social Purpose of Academic Freedom.

IF 1.1 4区哲学 Q3 ETHICS

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1353/ken.2021.0012

Shannon Dea

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the face of the increasing substitution of free speech for academic freedom, I argue for the distinctiveness and irreplaceability of the latter. Academic freedom has evolved alongside universities in order to support the important social purpose universities serve. Having limned this evolution, I compare academic freedom and free speech. This comparison reveals freedom of expression to be an individual freedom, and academic freedom to be a group-differentiated freedom with a social purpose. I argue that the social purpose of academic freedom behooves an inclusive approach to group differentiation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

学术自由的社会目的演变。

面对言论自由对学术自由的日益替代，我认为后者具有独特性和不可替代性。学术自由随着大学的发展而发展，以支持大学服务的重要社会目标。在描述了这种演变之后，我比较了学术自由和言论自由。这种比较揭示了言论自由是一种个体自由，而学术自由是一种具有社会目的的群体分化自由。我认为，学术自由的社会目的需要一种包容性的方法来区分群体。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Multiple-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal offers a scholarly forum for diverse views on major issues in bioethics, such as analysis and critique of principlism, feminist perspectives in bioethics, the work of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, active euthanasia, genetics, health care reform, and organ transplantation. Each issue includes "Scope Notes," an overview and extensive annotated bibliography on a specific topic in bioethics, and "Bioethics Inside the Beltway," a report written by a Washington insider updating bioethics activities on the federal level.