Beyond targets and instigators: Examining workplace incivility in dyads and the moderating role of perceived incivility norms.

The Journal of applied psychology Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-10 DOI:10.1037/apl0000910
Shannon G Taylor, Lauren R Locklear, Donald H Kluemper, Xinxin Lu
{"title":"Beyond targets and instigators: Examining workplace incivility in dyads and the moderating role of perceived incivility norms.","authors":"Shannon G Taylor, Lauren R Locklear, Donald H Kluemper, Xinxin Lu","doi":"10.1037/apl0000910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 2 decades since Andersson and Pearson (Academy of Management Review, 24, 452, 1999) suggested workplace incivility occurs in dyadic relationships between two employees, research has only studied incivility from the perspective of either the target or the instigator. In doing so, it implicitly treats experienced and instigated incivility as though they solely reflect (viz., dispositional and situational) characteristics of targets and instigators, ignoring that incivility is also attributable to the unique relationship between dyad members. The present study draws on the norm of reciprocity to examine workplace incivility in dyadic relationships and how it differs across individuals. Using dyads as the unit of analysis, we test our predictions among employees at a U.S. restaurant chain (Sample 1); a technology manufacturer in China (Sample 2); and across a range of industries, organizations, and jobs in the U.S. (Sample 3). We find that experienced and instigated incivility exhibit substantial variation at the dyad level, that the two are related within dyads after accounting for individuals' general tendencies to experience and instigate incivility, and that the within-dyad association between experienced and instigated incivility is moderated by perceived descriptive and injunctive norms regarding uncivil behavior. Implications and future research directions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":169654,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of applied psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1288-1302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of applied psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In the 2 decades since Andersson and Pearson (Academy of Management Review, 24, 452, 1999) suggested workplace incivility occurs in dyadic relationships between two employees, research has only studied incivility from the perspective of either the target or the instigator. In doing so, it implicitly treats experienced and instigated incivility as though they solely reflect (viz., dispositional and situational) characteristics of targets and instigators, ignoring that incivility is also attributable to the unique relationship between dyad members. The present study draws on the norm of reciprocity to examine workplace incivility in dyadic relationships and how it differs across individuals. Using dyads as the unit of analysis, we test our predictions among employees at a U.S. restaurant chain (Sample 1); a technology manufacturer in China (Sample 2); and across a range of industries, organizations, and jobs in the U.S. (Sample 3). We find that experienced and instigated incivility exhibit substantial variation at the dyad level, that the two are related within dyads after accounting for individuals' general tendencies to experience and instigate incivility, and that the within-dyad association between experienced and instigated incivility is moderated by perceived descriptive and injunctive norms regarding uncivil behavior. Implications and future research directions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
超越目标和煽动者:研究工作场所的不文明行为以及感知到的不文明规范的调节作用。
自Andersson和Pearson (Academy of Management Review, 24,452, 1999)提出工作场所不文明行为发生在两名员工之间的二元关系中以来的20年里,研究只从目标或煽动者的角度研究不文明行为。在这样做的过程中,它隐含地将经历过的和被煽动的不文明行为视为仅仅反映了目标和煽动者的特征(即性格和情境),而忽略了不文明行为也可归因于两组成员之间的独特关系。本研究利用互惠准则来考察二元关系中的职场不文明行为,以及个体之间的差异。我们使用二元数作为分析单位,在一家美国连锁餐厅的员工中测试了我们的预测(样本1);中国一家技术制造企业(样本2);以及在美国的一系列行业、组织和工作中(样本3)。我们发现,有经验的和被煽动的不文明行为在二元水平上表现出实质性的变化,在考虑了个人体验和煽动不文明行为的一般倾向后,两者在二元内是相关的,并且有经验的和被煽动的不文明行为之间的二元内关联被关于不文明行为的感知描述性和禁令性规范所调节。讨论了研究的意义和未来的研究方向。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信