Evaluation of patient safety culture in a private general hospital: a case study in Brazil.

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Cassiana Gil Prates, Rita Catalina Aquino Caregnato, Ana Maria Müller de Magalhães, Daiane Dal Pai, Janete de Souza Urbanetto, Gisela Maria Schebella Souto de Moura
{"title":"Evaluation of patient safety culture in a private general hospital: a case study in Brazil.","authors":"Cassiana Gil Prates,&nbsp;Rita Catalina Aquino Caregnato,&nbsp;Ana Maria Müller de Magalhães,&nbsp;Daiane Dal Pai,&nbsp;Janete de Souza Urbanetto,&nbsp;Gisela Maria Schebella Souto de Moura","doi":"10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2020-0235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to assess the patient safety culture perceived by healthcare and administrative staff in a Brazilian hospital and examine whether education and experience are related to positive perceptions.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A descriptive-analytical case study was carried out at Ernesto Dornelles Hospital, a private Brazilian institution. The Brazilian version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was used to assess the perceptions of 618 participants, of whom 315 worked in healthcare assistance and 303 in administrative services. The main outcome was the percentage of positive responses, and the independent variables included the type of work, schooling and length of experience.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>None of the twelve dimensions was strengthened. The percentage of positive responses was the highest for \"Hospital management support for patient safety\" (67.5%), and the lowest was for \"Nonpunitive response to error\" (29%). The healthcare staff had a slightly higher average than the administrative staff. The percentage of positive responses from professionals with undergraduate or graduate degrees was higher for the eight dimensions of safety culture. The length of hospital experience was not associated with any dimensions.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This study explored the influence of education and professional experience on the perception of patient safety in healthcare and administrative staff from a private institution. These approaches allow to know with greater depth and clarity factors that are related to the patient safety culture and, thus, have more consistent evidence to support interventions in specific needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47455,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2020-0235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose is to assess the patient safety culture perceived by healthcare and administrative staff in a Brazilian hospital and examine whether education and experience are related to positive perceptions.

Design/methodology/approach: A descriptive-analytical case study was carried out at Ernesto Dornelles Hospital, a private Brazilian institution. The Brazilian version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was used to assess the perceptions of 618 participants, of whom 315 worked in healthcare assistance and 303 in administrative services. The main outcome was the percentage of positive responses, and the independent variables included the type of work, schooling and length of experience.

Findings: None of the twelve dimensions was strengthened. The percentage of positive responses was the highest for "Hospital management support for patient safety" (67.5%), and the lowest was for "Nonpunitive response to error" (29%). The healthcare staff had a slightly higher average than the administrative staff. The percentage of positive responses from professionals with undergraduate or graduate degrees was higher for the eight dimensions of safety culture. The length of hospital experience was not associated with any dimensions.

Originality/value: This study explored the influence of education and professional experience on the perception of patient safety in healthcare and administrative staff from a private institution. These approaches allow to know with greater depth and clarity factors that are related to the patient safety culture and, thus, have more consistent evidence to support interventions in specific needs.

私立综合医院患者安全文化评价:以巴西为例。
目的:目的是评估巴西一家医院的医疗保健和行政人员所感知的患者安全文化,并检查教育和经验是否与积极的感知有关。设计/方法/方法:在巴西一家私营机构Ernesto Dornelles医院进行了描述性分析案例研究。巴西版的医院病人安全文化调查被用来评估618名参与者的看法,其中315人在医疗援助部门工作,303人在行政服务部门工作。主要结果是积极回答的百分比,自变量包括工作类型,学校教育和经验长度。结果:12个维度均未得到强化。对“医院管理对患者安全的支持”的正面回应比例最高(67.5%),对“错误的非惩罚性回应”的正面回应比例最低(29%)。卫生保健人员的平均水平略高于行政人员。在安全文化的八个维度中,拥有本科或研究生学位的专业人员的积极回应百分比更高。住院时间的长短与任何维度无关。原创性/价值:本研究探讨了教育和专业经验对私立机构医疗保健和行政人员对患者安全感知的影响。这些方法可以更深入、更清晰地了解与患者安全文化相关的因素,从而有更一致的证据来支持针对特定需求的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: ■Successful quality/continuous improvement projects ■The use of quality tools and models in leadership management development such as the EFQM Excellence Model, Balanced Scorecard, Quality Standards, Managed Care ■Issues relating to process control such as Six Sigma, Leadership, Managing Change and Process Mapping ■Improving patient care through quality related programmes and/or research Articles that use quantitative and qualitative methods are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信