Perceived Pain Responses to Foam Rolling Associate with Basal Heart Rate Variability.

Q2 Health Professions
Marvette Wilkerson, Christopher Anderson, Gregory J Grosicki, Andrew A Flatt
{"title":"Perceived Pain Responses to Foam Rolling Associate with Basal Heart Rate Variability.","authors":"Marvette Wilkerson,&nbsp;Christopher Anderson,&nbsp;Gregory J Grosicki,&nbsp;Andrew A Flatt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Foam rolling (FR) is a self-myofascial release technique with unclear effects on autonomic functioning, indexed by heart rate variability (HRV). FR can be perceived as painful or relaxing, which may explain interindividual HRV responses.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if acute FR alters resting HRV. A secondary aim was to determine if perceived pain during FR would predict HRV responses.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized, crossover design, healthy adults (50% female) performed total body FR or control on separate days. Perceived pain ratings were obtained following FR of each muscle group and summed to generate an overall perceived pain rating. Seated measures of the mean RR interval and the natural logarithm of the root-mean square of successive RR interval differences (LnRMSSD, a parasympathetic HRV index) were obtained at 5-10 min pre-, 5-10 min post-, and 25-30 min post-FR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No effects were observed for RR interval (<i>p</i> = .105-.561) or LnRMSSD (<i>p</i> = .110-.129). All effect sizes ranged from trivial-small (0.00-0.26). Changes in RR interval (<i>r</i> = 0.220-0.228, <i>p</i> = .433-.488) and LnRMSSD (<i>r</i> = 0.013-0.256, <i>p</i> = .376-.964) were not associated with pain scale sum. Baseline LnRMSSD was associated with pain scale sum (<i>r</i> = -0.663; <i>p</i> = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FR did not systematically alter HRV, nor did perceived pain ratings predict HRV responses. Those with lower pre-FR HRV reported higher perceived pain during FR. Basal cardiac autonomic activity may, therefore, influence pain sensitivity to FR in healthy adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":39090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8133875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Foam rolling (FR) is a self-myofascial release technique with unclear effects on autonomic functioning, indexed by heart rate variability (HRV). FR can be perceived as painful or relaxing, which may explain interindividual HRV responses.

Purpose: To determine if acute FR alters resting HRV. A secondary aim was to determine if perceived pain during FR would predict HRV responses.

Setting: Academic institution.

Methods: In a randomized, crossover design, healthy adults (50% female) performed total body FR or control on separate days. Perceived pain ratings were obtained following FR of each muscle group and summed to generate an overall perceived pain rating. Seated measures of the mean RR interval and the natural logarithm of the root-mean square of successive RR interval differences (LnRMSSD, a parasympathetic HRV index) were obtained at 5-10 min pre-, 5-10 min post-, and 25-30 min post-FR.

Results: No effects were observed for RR interval (p = .105-.561) or LnRMSSD (p = .110-.129). All effect sizes ranged from trivial-small (0.00-0.26). Changes in RR interval (r = 0.220-0.228, p = .433-.488) and LnRMSSD (r = 0.013-0.256, p = .376-.964) were not associated with pain scale sum. Baseline LnRMSSD was associated with pain scale sum (r = -0.663; p = .001).

Conclusion: FR did not systematically alter HRV, nor did perceived pain ratings predict HRV responses. Those with lower pre-FR HRV reported higher perceived pain during FR. Basal cardiac autonomic activity may, therefore, influence pain sensitivity to FR in healthy adults.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

泡沫滚动的感知疼痛反应与基础心率变异性有关。
背景:泡沫滚动(FR)是一种自我肌筋膜释放技术,对自主神经功能的影响尚不清楚,以心率变异性(HRV)为指标。FR可被视为疼痛或放松,这可以解释个体间HRV反应。目的:确定急性FR是否会改变静息HRV。第二个目的是确定FR期间的感知疼痛是否能预测HRV反应。设置:学术机构。方法:在随机交叉设计中,健康成年人(50%为女性)在不同的日子进行全身FR或对照。根据每个肌肉群的FR获得感知疼痛评分,并将其相加以产生总体感知疼痛评分。在fr前5-10分钟,fr后5-10分钟和fr后25-30分钟,分别测量平均RR间隔和连续RR间隔差异均方根的自然对数(LnRMSSD,副交感HRV指数)。结果:RR间隔(p = 0.105 - 0.561)和LnRMSSD (p = 0.110 - 0.129)均无影响。所有的效应量范围从微不足道到很小(0.000 -0.26)。RR区间(r = 0.220 ~ 0.228, p = .433 ~ .488)和LnRMSSD (r = 0.013 ~ 0.256, p = .376 ~ .964)的变化与疼痛量表总分无相关性。基线LnRMSSD与疼痛量表总和相关(r = -0.663;P = .001)。结论:FR不能系统性地改变HRV,感知疼痛评分也不能预测HRV反应。FR前HRV较低的患者报告FR期间疼痛感较高。因此,基础心脏自主神经活动可能影响健康成人对FR的疼痛敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJTMB is a peer-reviewed journal focusing on the research (methodological, physiological, and clinical) and professional development of therapeutic massage and bodywork and its providers, encompassing all allied health providers whose services include manually applied therapeutic massage and bodywork. The Journal provides a professional forum for editorial input; scientifically-based articles of a research, educational, and practice-oriented nature; readers’ commentaries on journal content and related professional matters; and pertinent news and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信