Comparison of the lateral sagittal and costoclavicular approaches for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block in pediatric patients: a prospective randomized study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
{"title":"Comparison of the lateral sagittal and costoclavicular approaches for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block in pediatric patients: a prospective randomized study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2021.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The lateral sagittal brachial plexus block is the most used method for pediatric upper extremity surgery, whereas the applications of costoclavicular brachial plexus block are limited. This study aimed to compare the lateral sagittal and costoclavicular approaches for the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block in pediatric patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty pediatric patients aged 5...15 years undergoing hand or forearm surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. Group LS (n.ß=.ß30) received ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal block, and Group CC (n.ß=.ß30) received ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block. The block performing time, needling time, imaging time, needle visibility, number of passes, sensorial/motor block time, and postoperative pain scores were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The needling time (82.90.ß...ß28.17 seconds vs. 64.77.ß...ß28.11 seconds respectively, <em>p</em>.ß=.ß0.004) and total block performance time (109.53 .. 29.75 seconds vs. 89.70 .. 29.98 seconds respectively, <em>p</em>.ß=.ß0.005) were significantly longer in Group LS than in Group CC. However, there was no significant difference between the groups in imaging time, needle visibility, number of passes, sensorial/motor block time, and postoperative pain scores (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Costoclavicular and lateral sagittal brachial plexus blocks resulted in similar anesthetics effects. Moreover, the costoclavicular method can be a better alternative to lateral sagittal as it has a shorter block performance time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421002244/pdfft?md5=2c68b4333e22619d07296d191bd64f32&pid=1-s2.0-S0104001421002244-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421002244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The lateral sagittal brachial plexus block is the most used method for pediatric upper extremity surgery, whereas the applications of costoclavicular brachial plexus block are limited. This study aimed to compare the lateral sagittal and costoclavicular approaches for the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block in pediatric patients.

Methods

Sixty pediatric patients aged 5...15 years undergoing hand or forearm surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. Group LS (n.ß=.ß30) received ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal block, and Group CC (n.ß=.ß30) received ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block. The block performing time, needling time, imaging time, needle visibility, number of passes, sensorial/motor block time, and postoperative pain scores were evaluated.

Results

The needling time (82.90.ß...ß28.17 seconds vs. 64.77.ß...ß28.11 seconds respectively, p.ß=.ß0.004) and total block performance time (109.53 .. 29.75 seconds vs. 89.70 .. 29.98 seconds respectively, p.ß=.ß0.005) were significantly longer in Group LS than in Group CC. However, there was no significant difference between the groups in imaging time, needle visibility, number of passes, sensorial/motor block time, and postoperative pain scores (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Costoclavicular and lateral sagittal brachial plexus blocks resulted in similar anesthetics effects. Moreover, the costoclavicular method can be a better alternative to lateral sagittal as it has a shorter block performance time.

在超声引导下对儿科患者进行锁骨下阻滞的外侧矢状切口和肋锁切口的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
背景:外侧矢状位臂丛神经阻滞是小儿上肢手术中最常用的方法,而肋锁骨臂丛神经阻滞的应用却很有限。本研究旨在比较超声引导下锁骨下阻滞在小儿患者中的外侧矢状位方法和肋锁骨方法:方法:将接受手部或前臂手术的 60 名 5-15 岁小儿患者随机分为两组。LS组(n = 30)接受超声引导下的侧矢状阻滞,CC组(n = 30)接受超声引导下的锁骨下阻滞。对阻滞执行时间、针刺时间、成像时间、针头可见度、通过次数、感觉/运动阻滞时间和术后疼痛评分进行了评估:结果:LS 组的针刺时间(82.90 ± 28.17 秒 vs. 64.77 ± 28.11 秒,P = 0.004)和总阻滞时间(109.53 ± 29.75 秒 vs. 89.70 ± 29.98 秒,P = 0.005)明显长于 CC 组。然而,两组在成像时间、针头可见度、通过次数、感觉/运动阻滞时间和术后疼痛评分方面无明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:肋锁和侧矢状臂丛神经阻滞的麻醉效果相似。结论:肋锁和侧矢状臂丛阻滞的麻醉效果相似,而且肋锁法阻滞时间更短,是侧矢状阻滞的更好替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信