Atherectomy and Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Long Infrapopliteal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Aljoscha Rastan, Marianne Brodmann, Tanja Böhme, Roland Macharzina, Elias Noory, Ulrich Beschorner, Peter-Christian Flügel, Karlheinz Bürgelin, Franz-Josef Neumann, Thomas Zeller
{"title":"Atherectomy and Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Long Infrapopliteal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Aljoscha Rastan,&nbsp;Marianne Brodmann,&nbsp;Tanja Böhme,&nbsp;Roland Macharzina,&nbsp;Elias Noory,&nbsp;Ulrich Beschorner,&nbsp;Peter-Christian Flügel,&nbsp;Karlheinz Bürgelin,&nbsp;Franz-Josef Neumann,&nbsp;Thomas Zeller","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prospective, randomized, multicenter trials show no beneficial impact of drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy alone on the technical and clinical outcomes of infrapopliteal artery lesions in comparison to plain old balloon angioplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of directional atherectomy (DA) plus DCB angioplasty versus DCB alone in treatment of long infrapopliteal artery lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, randomized, 2-center trial comparing the performance of DA+DCB and DCB alone in treatment of 80 patients with de novo infrapopliteal artery lesions. The primary study end point was the 6-month primary patency of the target lesion detected by angiography and duplex ultrasound. Secondary end points included clinically driven target vessel revascularization, amputation rates, and changes in Rutherford-Becker class at 1 year. A core laboratory provides independent analyses for all scheduled and unscheduled duplex ultrasound examinations and angiographies, and a research institute ensured independent data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean target lesion length was 179.7±98.2 mm. Nine patients (11.3%) died during the follow-up period. At 6 months, primary patency was 49% (n=18) with DA+DCB versus 34% (n=12) with DCB alone (P=0.241), and clinically driven target vessel revascularization was 8% (n=3) versus 14% (n=5; P=0.475), respectively. At 1 year, the target lesion revascularization rates were 30% (n=10) versus 43% (n=12; P=0.308), the median in Rutherford-Becker class was 2 (0.25–5) versus 5 (0.25–5; P=0.329), and amputation rates were 22% (n=8) versus 32% (n=11; P=0.618) in the DA+DCB group and the DCB group, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment of long infrapopliteal artery lesions with DA+DCB versus DCB alone leads to comparable clinical and technical results at 6 months and 1 year.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01763476.</p>","PeriodicalId":516631,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e010280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Prospective, randomized, multicenter trials show no beneficial impact of drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy alone on the technical and clinical outcomes of infrapopliteal artery lesions in comparison to plain old balloon angioplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of directional atherectomy (DA) plus DCB angioplasty versus DCB alone in treatment of long infrapopliteal artery lesions.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, 2-center trial comparing the performance of DA+DCB and DCB alone in treatment of 80 patients with de novo infrapopliteal artery lesions. The primary study end point was the 6-month primary patency of the target lesion detected by angiography and duplex ultrasound. Secondary end points included clinically driven target vessel revascularization, amputation rates, and changes in Rutherford-Becker class at 1 year. A core laboratory provides independent analyses for all scheduled and unscheduled duplex ultrasound examinations and angiographies, and a research institute ensured independent data collection.

Results: The mean target lesion length was 179.7±98.2 mm. Nine patients (11.3%) died during the follow-up period. At 6 months, primary patency was 49% (n=18) with DA+DCB versus 34% (n=12) with DCB alone (P=0.241), and clinically driven target vessel revascularization was 8% (n=3) versus 14% (n=5; P=0.475), respectively. At 1 year, the target lesion revascularization rates were 30% (n=10) versus 43% (n=12; P=0.308), the median in Rutherford-Becker class was 2 (0.25–5) versus 5 (0.25–5; P=0.329), and amputation rates were 22% (n=8) versus 32% (n=11; P=0.618) in the DA+DCB group and the DCB group, respectively.

Conclusions: Treatment of long infrapopliteal artery lesions with DA+DCB versus DCB alone leads to comparable clinical and technical results at 6 months and 1 year.

Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01763476.

动脉粥样硬化切除术和药物包被球囊血管成形术治疗长股动脉下病变:一项随机对照试验。
背景:前瞻性、随机、多中心试验显示,与普通的球囊血管成形术相比,单独使用药物包被球囊(DCB)治疗对膝下动脉病变的技术和临床结果没有有益的影响。本研究的目的是评估定向动脉粥样硬化切除术(DA)加DCB血管成形术与单独DCB治疗长股下动脉病变的效果。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双中心试验,比较DA+DCB和单独DCB治疗80例新发腘下动脉病变的疗效。主要研究终点是通过血管造影和双工超声检测目标病变6个月的原发性通畅。次要终点包括临床驱动的靶血管重建术、截肢率和1年后Rutherford-Becker分级的变化。一个核心实验室为所有计划和未计划的双超声检查和血管造影提供独立分析,一个研究所确保独立的数据收集。结果:靶病变平均长度为179.7±98.2 mm。9例(11.3%)患者在随访期间死亡。在6个月时,DA+DCB组的原发性通畅率为49% (n=18),而单独DCB组为34% (n=12) (P=0.241),临床驱动的靶血管重建术为8% (n=3)对14% (n=5);分别P = 0.475)。1年后,目标病变血运重建率分别为30% (n=10)和43% (n=12);P=0.308), Rutherford-Becker分类的中位数为2(0.25-5)对5 (0.25-5;P=0.329),截肢率分别为22% (n=8)和32% (n=11;P=0.618),分别为DA+DCB组和DCB组。结论:DA+DCB与单独DCB治疗长股下动脉病变在6个月和1年的临床和技术结果相当。注册:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT01763476。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信