Surfactant protein D: a useful marker for differentiation of drug-induced pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia.

IF 8.5 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yuko Waseda, Masahide Yasui, Kousuke Kurokawa, Ryo Chikazawa, Toshihiro Takeda, Miho Mitsui, Tomoaki Sonoda, Makiko Yamaguchi, Satoshi Watanabe, Hazuki Takato, Yukari Ichikawa, Yukihiro Umeda, Masaki Anzai, Hiroshi Ueda, Kazuo Kasahara, Tamotsu Ishizuka
{"title":"Surfactant protein D: a useful marker for differentiation of drug-induced pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia.","authors":"Yuko Waseda,&nbsp;Masahide Yasui,&nbsp;Kousuke Kurokawa,&nbsp;Ryo Chikazawa,&nbsp;Toshihiro Takeda,&nbsp;Miho Mitsui,&nbsp;Tomoaki Sonoda,&nbsp;Makiko Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Satoshi Watanabe,&nbsp;Hazuki Takato,&nbsp;Yukari Ichikawa,&nbsp;Yukihiro Umeda,&nbsp;Masaki Anzai,&nbsp;Hiroshi Ueda,&nbsp;Kazuo Kasahara,&nbsp;Tamotsu Ishizuka","doi":"10.1186/s41479-021-00087-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-induced pneumonia (d-pneumonia) and bacterial pneumonia (b-pneumonia) are often difficult to differentiate; therefore, this study examined the possibility of differentiating them using serum biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 22 and 16 patients diagnosed with b- and d-pneumonia, respectively, at our institution or affiliated institutions. For d-pneumonia, the causative drug was minocycline hydrochloride in four patients, gefitinib in two patients, nivolumab in two patients, pembrolizumab in two patients, sulfasalazine in two patients, loxoprofen in one patient, Bouiougitou in one patient, edoxaban tosilate hydrate in one patient, and abemaciclib in one patient. White blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), surfactant protein (SP)-D, and SP-A levels were measured in each patient and compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were noted in the WBC and SP-D levels between the two groups (P < 0.05, P < 0.001), but not in the CRP, KL-6, or SP-A levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results suggest that SP-D is a useful marker for differentiating b-pneumonia and d-pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":45120,"journal":{"name":"Pneumonia","volume":"13 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41479-021-00087-6","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumonia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-021-00087-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Drug-induced pneumonia (d-pneumonia) and bacterial pneumonia (b-pneumonia) are often difficult to differentiate; therefore, this study examined the possibility of differentiating them using serum biomarkers.

Methods: The study included 22 and 16 patients diagnosed with b- and d-pneumonia, respectively, at our institution or affiliated institutions. For d-pneumonia, the causative drug was minocycline hydrochloride in four patients, gefitinib in two patients, nivolumab in two patients, pembrolizumab in two patients, sulfasalazine in two patients, loxoprofen in one patient, Bouiougitou in one patient, edoxaban tosilate hydrate in one patient, and abemaciclib in one patient. White blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), surfactant protein (SP)-D, and SP-A levels were measured in each patient and compared between the groups.

Results: Significant differences were noted in the WBC and SP-D levels between the two groups (P < 0.05, P < 0.001), but not in the CRP, KL-6, or SP-A levels.

Conclusion: The study results suggest that SP-D is a useful marker for differentiating b-pneumonia and d-pneumonia.

Abstract Image

表面活性剂蛋白D:鉴别药物性肺炎与细菌性肺炎的有用标志物。
背景:药物性肺炎(d型肺炎)和细菌性肺炎(b型肺炎)通常难以区分;因此,本研究探讨了使用血清生物标志物区分它们的可能性。方法:本研究纳入本院或附属机构分别诊断为b型和d型肺炎的22例和16例患者。对于d型肺炎,4例患者的病因药物为盐酸米诺环素,2例患者为吉非替尼,2例患者为纳武单抗,2例患者为派姆单抗,2例患者为柳氮磺胺吡啶,1例患者为loxoprofen, 1例患者为Bouiougitou, 1例患者为edoxaban tosilate hydrate, 1例患者为abemaciclib。测定各组患者白细胞(WBC)、c反应蛋白(CRP)、KL-6 (KL-6)、表面活性蛋白(SP)-D、SP- a水平,并进行组间比较。结果:两组患者WBC、SP-D水平差异有统计学意义(P)。结论:SP-D是鉴别b型肺炎和d型肺炎的有效标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pneumonia
Pneumonia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
1.50%
发文量
7
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信