Online news media reporting of ketamine as a treatment for depression from 2000 to 2017.

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1017/ipm.2021.47
Bronagh Gallagher, Aaron Neiman, Marie-Claire Slattery, Declan M McLoughlin
{"title":"Online news media reporting of ketamine as a treatment for depression from 2000 to 2017.","authors":"Bronagh Gallagher, Aaron Neiman, Marie-Claire Slattery, Declan M McLoughlin","doi":"10.1017/ipm.2021.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since the first reporting of ketamine's antidepressant effects in 2000, there has been growing public interest in this novel rapid-acting treatment for depression despite its abuse potential. Online media is an increasingly popular way for the general public to source information. Our objective was to examine how online news outlets have portrayed ketamine as an antidepressant by ascertaining the volume and content of relevant articles and trends over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this semi-quantitative study, we identified articles regarding ketamine's use in depression from the 30 most popular English-language online news-generating sources over 18 years (2000-2017). Articles were then blindly assessed by 2 independent raters, who analysed the texts by quantifying the presence/absence of 12 content items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 97 articles, the number of which has increased since the first online news report in 2006. Most (69%) came from the USA and nearly all correctly stated the indications for ketamine. About half of the most recent articles mentioned abuse potential and 27% of articles referred to risks of unregulated use of ketamine. Just under 20% of articles referred to the lack of evidence regarding direct comparisons between ketamine and other currently available antidepressants. There was no difference in the overall level of detail within the articles during the study time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online news media articles have been generally positive about ketamine for treating depression but need to be interpreted with caution as many of them did not discuss negative aspects of ketamine and made unsubstantiated claims about ketamine.</p>","PeriodicalId":46220,"journal":{"name":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","volume":" ","pages":"607-615"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2021.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Since the first reporting of ketamine's antidepressant effects in 2000, there has been growing public interest in this novel rapid-acting treatment for depression despite its abuse potential. Online media is an increasingly popular way for the general public to source information. Our objective was to examine how online news outlets have portrayed ketamine as an antidepressant by ascertaining the volume and content of relevant articles and trends over time.

Methods: In this semi-quantitative study, we identified articles regarding ketamine's use in depression from the 30 most popular English-language online news-generating sources over 18 years (2000-2017). Articles were then blindly assessed by 2 independent raters, who analysed the texts by quantifying the presence/absence of 12 content items.

Results: We identified 97 articles, the number of which has increased since the first online news report in 2006. Most (69%) came from the USA and nearly all correctly stated the indications for ketamine. About half of the most recent articles mentioned abuse potential and 27% of articles referred to risks of unregulated use of ketamine. Just under 20% of articles referred to the lack of evidence regarding direct comparisons between ketamine and other currently available antidepressants. There was no difference in the overall level of detail within the articles during the study time period.

Conclusions: Online news media articles have been generally positive about ketamine for treating depression but need to be interpreted with caution as many of them did not discuss negative aspects of ketamine and made unsubstantiated claims about ketamine.

2000 年至 2017 年网络新闻媒体对氯胺酮治疗抑郁症的报道。
目的:自 2000 年首次报道氯胺酮的抗抑郁作用以来,尽管这种新型速效治疗抑郁症的药物有可能被滥用,但公众对它的兴趣与日俱增。网络媒体是公众获取信息的一种日益流行的方式。我们的目的是通过确定相关文章的数量和内容以及随着时间推移的趋势,研究网络新闻是如何将氯胺酮描绘成一种抗抑郁药的:在这项半定量研究中,我们从18年间(2000-2017年)最受欢迎的30个英语在线新闻来源中找出了有关氯胺酮用于抑郁症的文章。然后由两名独立评分员对文章进行盲评,他们通过量化 12 个内容项目的存在/不存在对文本进行分析:我们确定了 97 篇文章,其数量自 2006 年首次在线新闻报道以来有所增加。大多数文章(69%)来自美国,几乎所有文章都正确说明了氯胺酮的适应症。大约一半的最新文章提到了滥用氯胺酮的可能性,27%的文章提到了不规范使用氯胺酮的风险。略低于20%的文章提到氯胺酮与其他现有抗抑郁药物之间缺乏直接比较的证据。在研究期间,文章的总体详细程度没有差别:网络新闻媒体的文章普遍对氯胺酮治疗抑郁症持肯定态度,但需要谨慎解读,因为其中许多文章没有讨论氯胺酮的负面影响,而且对氯胺酮的说法未经证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.90%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信