Salvage procedure for cut-through after surgical fixation of trochanteric fractures with TFN.

IF 1.5
Llano Lionel, Carabelli Guido, Brandariz Rodrigo, Taype Danilo, Barla Jorge, Sancineto Carlos
{"title":"Salvage procedure for cut-through after surgical fixation of trochanteric fractures with TFN.","authors":"Llano Lionel, Carabelli Guido, Brandariz Rodrigo, Taype Danilo, Barla Jorge, Sancineto Carlos","doi":"10.1007/s00590-021-03021-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Closed reduction and fixation using a cephalomedullary nail represents the accepted management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Cut-through has been described as a complication associated with the treatment. Although a hip arthroplasty may be the most predictable revision method, a non-prosthetic option can lead to similar results. The objective is to describe a non-prosthetic revision procedure in cases of cut-through.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of our Institutional Registry for Hip Fractures in elderly patients (RIAFC) from January 2010 to June 2018 searching for cut-through as a failure after unstable intertrochanteric fracture treatment. REVISION PROCEDURE: (A) Helical blade removal, introduction of structural bone graft (autologous or allograft) as a plug to obliterate the communication to the joint and a new blade insertion. (B) Same as in A but augmenting the blade/head purchase with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Before the cement insertion, a radio-opaque solution was instilled to assure lack of joint leakage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 1616 patients. Sixteen of them presented a cut-through complication (1%). Ten of them were females with an average age for all of 84 years. One patient denied an implant revision and opted for a total joint replacement. In four of the patients, the procedure A was done, 2 of them had a new failure, and an joint arthroplasty was performed. In the B group, only one patient needed a revision to a total hip. The other 10 patients healed uneventfully and did not need any further intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cut-through revision after fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nail by blocking of the joint communication and augmenting the head blade purchase with PMMA is a safe and minimal invasive procedure, generates low blood loss and rate of complications and allows bone healing preserving the native joint.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>Nil.</p>","PeriodicalId":520619,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie","volume":" ","pages":"611-618"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03021-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Closed reduction and fixation using a cephalomedullary nail represents the accepted management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Cut-through has been described as a complication associated with the treatment. Although a hip arthroplasty may be the most predictable revision method, a non-prosthetic option can lead to similar results. The objective is to describe a non-prosthetic revision procedure in cases of cut-through.

Method: We performed a retrospective analysis of our Institutional Registry for Hip Fractures in elderly patients (RIAFC) from January 2010 to June 2018 searching for cut-through as a failure after unstable intertrochanteric fracture treatment. REVISION PROCEDURE: (A) Helical blade removal, introduction of structural bone graft (autologous or allograft) as a plug to obliterate the communication to the joint and a new blade insertion. (B) Same as in A but augmenting the blade/head purchase with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Before the cement insertion, a radio-opaque solution was instilled to assure lack of joint leakage.

Results: We evaluated 1616 patients. Sixteen of them presented a cut-through complication (1%). Ten of them were females with an average age for all of 84 years. One patient denied an implant revision and opted for a total joint replacement. In four of the patients, the procedure A was done, 2 of them had a new failure, and an joint arthroplasty was performed. In the B group, only one patient needed a revision to a total hip. The other 10 patients healed uneventfully and did not need any further intervention.

Conclusion: Cut-through revision after fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nail by blocking of the joint communication and augmenting the head blade purchase with PMMA is a safe and minimal invasive procedure, generates low blood loss and rate of complications and allows bone healing preserving the native joint.

Level of evidence iv: Nil.

TFN固定粗隆骨折后切开的抢救方法。
简介:使用头髓内钉闭合复位和固定是治疗不稳定转子间骨折的公认方法。切开被描述为与治疗相关的并发症。虽然髋关节置换术可能是最可预测的修复方法,但非假体的选择也可能导致类似的结果。目的是描述一个非假体翻修程序的情况下,切割。方法:我们对2010年1月至2018年6月的老年髋部骨折患者机构登记(RIAFC)进行回顾性分析,寻找不稳定转子间骨折治疗后的切开失败。手术步骤:(A)去除螺旋叶片,引入结构性骨移植物(自体或同种异体移植物)作为阻塞,以消除与关节的联系,并插入新的叶片。(B)与A相同,但增加了用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)购买的叶片/头部。在注入水泥之前,注入一种放射性不透明溶液,以确保没有接缝泄漏。结果:我们评估了1616例患者。其中16例出现穿透性并发症(1%)。其中10人是女性,平均年龄为84岁。一名患者拒绝假体翻修,选择全关节置换术。在4个病人中,完成了手术A,其中2个有新的失败,并进行了关节置换术。在B组中,只有一名患者需要全髋关节翻修。其他10例患者痊愈,不需要任何进一步的干预。结论:阻断关节通讯、PMMA增加头刀片购买的头髓钉治疗不稳定转子间骨折固定后切开翻修是一种安全、微创的手术,出血量少,并发症发生率低,骨愈合,保留了原关节。证据等级iv:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书