A Prospective Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine and Ropivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine on Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgery.

Q2 Medicine
Prasad Chandrakant, Verma Vinod Kumar, Kumar Arvind, Kumar Neeraj, Kumar Gunjan
{"title":"A Prospective Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine and Ropivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine on Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgery.","authors":"Prasad Chandrakant,&nbsp;Verma Vinod Kumar,&nbsp;Kumar Arvind,&nbsp;Kumar Neeraj,&nbsp;Kumar Gunjan","doi":"10.2478/rjaic-2020-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Caudal epidural block is a reliable technique in paediatric patients but associated with various complications especially with higher concentration of drugs. We proposed a comparative study between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine at low concentration (0.125%) with clonidine at low dose (1 mcg/kg) taken as adjuvant. We aimed to see duration of post-operative analgesia, degree of motor blockade and other associated complications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty paediatric patients (1-6 years), American society of anaesthesiologists grade I and II, undergoing infra-umbilical surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups of 40 each. Group A patients were given caudal levobupivacaine (0.125%) and Group B patients were given caudal ropivacaine (0.125%). Clonidine (1 mcg/kg) was taken as adjuvant in both the groups. Post-operative pain, sedation and motor blockade were assessed at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours using Observational Pain Scale, modified Bromage Scale and four-point sedation score, respectively. Any other complications were also noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Motor blockade was not associated with any of the patients. Duration of post-operative sedation was similar in both the groups. Duration of post-operative analgesia was significantly higher in Group A (p < 0.0001). Adverse effects and complications were negligible in both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both levobupivacaine and ropivacaine can be used safely at low concentration (0.125%) taking clonidine at low dose (1 mcg/kg) as adjuvant in paediatric caudal epidural block without significant motor blockade and other complications, duration of post-operative analgesia being significantly higher in the levobupivacaine group.</p>","PeriodicalId":21279,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care","volume":"27 1","pages":"52-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/cf/rjaic-27-052.PMC8158307.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rjaic-2020-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Caudal epidural block is a reliable technique in paediatric patients but associated with various complications especially with higher concentration of drugs. We proposed a comparative study between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine at low concentration (0.125%) with clonidine at low dose (1 mcg/kg) taken as adjuvant. We aimed to see duration of post-operative analgesia, degree of motor blockade and other associated complications.

Materials and methods: Eighty paediatric patients (1-6 years), American society of anaesthesiologists grade I and II, undergoing infra-umbilical surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups of 40 each. Group A patients were given caudal levobupivacaine (0.125%) and Group B patients were given caudal ropivacaine (0.125%). Clonidine (1 mcg/kg) was taken as adjuvant in both the groups. Post-operative pain, sedation and motor blockade were assessed at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours using Observational Pain Scale, modified Bromage Scale and four-point sedation score, respectively. Any other complications were also noted.

Results: Motor blockade was not associated with any of the patients. Duration of post-operative sedation was similar in both the groups. Duration of post-operative analgesia was significantly higher in Group A (p < 0.0001). Adverse effects and complications were negligible in both the groups.

Conclusion: Both levobupivacaine and ropivacaine can be used safely at low concentration (0.125%) taking clonidine at low dose (1 mcg/kg) as adjuvant in paediatric caudal epidural block without significant motor blockade and other complications, duration of post-operative analgesia being significantly higher in the levobupivacaine group.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

左旋布比卡因(0.125%)加可乐定、罗哌卡因(0.125%)加可乐定对小儿脐下手术术后镇痛的前瞻性双盲对照临床研究
尾侧硬膜外阻滞对儿科患者是一种可靠的技术,但与各种并发症相关,特别是药物浓度较高。我们建议将低浓度(0.125%)左布比卡因和罗哌卡因与低剂量(1 mcg/kg)可乐定作为佐剂进行对比研究。我们的目的是观察术后镇痛持续时间、运动阻滞程度和其他相关并发症。材料与方法:选取80例1 ~ 6岁美国麻醉师学会一级和二级儿科全麻脐下手术患者,随机分为两组,每组40例。A组患者尾侧给予左布比卡因(0.125%),B组患者尾侧给予罗哌卡因(0.125%)。两组均以可乐定(1 mcg/kg)作为佐剂。分别在30分钟、1小时、2小时、4小时、6小时、12小时、18小时和24小时采用观察性疼痛量表、改良Bromage量表和镇静四点评分评估术后疼痛、镇静和运动阻断。任何其他并发症也被记录。结果:运动阻滞与所有患者均无相关性。两组术后镇静时间相似。A组术后镇痛时间明显高于对照组(p < 0.0001)。两组的不良反应和并发症均可忽略不计。结论:左布比卡因和罗哌卡因均可在低浓度(0.125%)下安全使用,以低剂量(1 mcg/kg)的克拉定辅助进行小儿尾侧硬膜外阻滞,无明显的运动阻滞等并发症,左布比卡因组术后镇痛持续时间明显高于左布比卡因组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Romanian Journal of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is the official journal of the Romanian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and has been published continuously since 1994. It is intended mainly for anaesthesia and intensive care providers, but it is also aimed at specialists in emergency medical care and in pain research and management. The Journal is indexed in Scopus, Embase, PubMed Central as well as the databases of the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research (CNCSIS) B+ category. The Journal publishes two issues per year, the first one in April and the second one in October, and contains original articles, reviews, case reports, letters to the editor, book reviews and commentaries. The Journal is distributed free of charge to the members of the Romanian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信