The Decision-Making Experiences of Caregivers Regarding Feeding Tube Placement in Community-Dwelling Adults: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study.

Deltra C Muoki, Sandra Cesario, Peggy Landrum, Sabrenda Littles
{"title":"The Decision-Making Experiences of Caregivers Regarding Feeding Tube Placement in Community-Dwelling Adults: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study.","authors":"Deltra C Muoki,&nbsp;Sandra Cesario,&nbsp;Peggy Landrum,&nbsp;Sabrenda Littles","doi":"10.1097/SGA.0000000000000526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tube placement is multifactorial and considered a lifesaving mechanism, which leads to a host of thoughts and feelings that affect the decision-making experience. As people live longer and the population ages, these decisions often involve the caregivers who have their own experience and therefore can result in caregiver burden and anxiety. A descriptive phenomenological study was conducted to describe and understand the caregiver's decision-making experience regarding percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tube placement in community-dwelling adults. Edmund Husserl's philosophical underpinnings were utilized in conjunction with Colaizzi's (1978) method of data analysis to maintain the rigor of the study. Sixteen adult caregivers of patients from six rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted. The study results yield four main themes: \"Survival ... that was the determining factor\"; \"The doctor decided\"; \"More education ... just make sure they understand\"; and \"It makes me very scared.\" Implications for practice, policy, and future research are thoroughly discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":504885,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates","volume":" ","pages":"192-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SGA.0000000000000526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tube placement is multifactorial and considered a lifesaving mechanism, which leads to a host of thoughts and feelings that affect the decision-making experience. As people live longer and the population ages, these decisions often involve the caregivers who have their own experience and therefore can result in caregiver burden and anxiety. A descriptive phenomenological study was conducted to describe and understand the caregiver's decision-making experience regarding percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tube placement in community-dwelling adults. Edmund Husserl's philosophical underpinnings were utilized in conjunction with Colaizzi's (1978) method of data analysis to maintain the rigor of the study. Sixteen adult caregivers of patients from six rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted. The study results yield four main themes: "Survival ... that was the determining factor"; "The doctor decided"; "More education ... just make sure they understand"; and "It makes me very scared." Implications for practice, policy, and future research are thoroughly discussed.

照顾者对社区成人饲管安置之决策经验:描述现象学研究。
经皮内镜胃造口术饲管放置是多因素的,被认为是一种拯救生命的机制,它会导致许多影响决策体验的想法和感受。随着人们寿命的延长和人口的老龄化,这些决定往往涉及到有自己经验的照顾者,因此可能导致照顾者的负担和焦虑。一项描述性现象学研究旨在描述和了解社区居住成人经皮内镜胃造口术饲管放置的护理人员决策经验。埃德蒙·胡塞尔的哲学基础与Colaizzi(1978)的数据分析方法相结合,以保持研究的严谨性。采用半结构化访谈指南对来自6家康复和专业护理机构的16名成年护理人员进行了访谈。对采访录音进行了转录,并进行了专题分析。研究结果产生了四个主要主题:“生存……这是决定因素”;“医生决定了”;“更多的教育……只要确保他们理解就行”;“这让我很害怕。”对实践、政策和未来研究的影响进行了深入的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信