Clinic- and Community-Based National Diabetes Prevention Programs in Los Angeles.

Amelia R DeFosset, Megala Sivashanmugam, Jennifer Mosst, Tony Kuo
{"title":"Clinic- and Community-Based National Diabetes Prevention Programs in Los Angeles.","authors":"Amelia R DeFosset,&nbsp;Megala Sivashanmugam,&nbsp;Jennifer Mosst,&nbsp;Tony Kuo","doi":"10.1177/10901981211016759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinics and community-based organizations (CBOs) are priority settings for implementing the evidence-based National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). Both program settings present theoretical advantages and disadvantages for engaging and helping populations most at risk for diabetes achieve lifestyle change goals. To date, few studies have compared implementation across them. The present study describes participant characteristics and lifestyle change outcomes across a sample of clinic- and community-based National DPPs which delivered services in Los Angeles during 2015 to 2018 (two clinics, two CBOs, combined <i>n</i> = 265 participants). Analyses examined participant gender, age, race/ethnicity, baseline body mass index, and program attributes such as screening method and language of instruction. Negative binomial regression models tested for differences in program attendance, mean weekly physical activity, and percent change in body weight by setting. Overall, participants were largely Hispanic/Latinx (81.51%) and female (90.19%). Programs operated by CBOs engaged other race/ethnic groups including Black participants more frequently than those operated by clinics (20.56% vs. 0%); the latter engaged more men (15.29% vs. 7.22%). Few participants in any setting met the National DPP's weight loss goal (clinic: 15.29%, CBO: 20.00%). Participating in a community-based program was initially associated with higher attendance and mean weekly physical activity, but associations were not significant after adjusting for covariates. Study results have practice implications for National DPP implementation and can help inform future efforts to scale and spread the program in Los Angeles and nationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":520637,"journal":{"name":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","volume":" ","pages":"647-657"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10901981211016759","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981211016759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Clinics and community-based organizations (CBOs) are priority settings for implementing the evidence-based National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). Both program settings present theoretical advantages and disadvantages for engaging and helping populations most at risk for diabetes achieve lifestyle change goals. To date, few studies have compared implementation across them. The present study describes participant characteristics and lifestyle change outcomes across a sample of clinic- and community-based National DPPs which delivered services in Los Angeles during 2015 to 2018 (two clinics, two CBOs, combined n = 265 participants). Analyses examined participant gender, age, race/ethnicity, baseline body mass index, and program attributes such as screening method and language of instruction. Negative binomial regression models tested for differences in program attendance, mean weekly physical activity, and percent change in body weight by setting. Overall, participants were largely Hispanic/Latinx (81.51%) and female (90.19%). Programs operated by CBOs engaged other race/ethnic groups including Black participants more frequently than those operated by clinics (20.56% vs. 0%); the latter engaged more men (15.29% vs. 7.22%). Few participants in any setting met the National DPP's weight loss goal (clinic: 15.29%, CBO: 20.00%). Participating in a community-based program was initially associated with higher attendance and mean weekly physical activity, but associations were not significant after adjusting for covariates. Study results have practice implications for National DPP implementation and can help inform future efforts to scale and spread the program in Los Angeles and nationally.

洛杉矶诊所和社区国家糖尿病预防项目。
诊所和社区组织(cbo)是实施以证据为基础的国家糖尿病预防计划(DPP)的优先设置。在吸引和帮助糖尿病高危人群实现生活方式改变目标方面,这两种方案设置都有理论上的优势和劣势。迄今为止,很少有研究对它们的实施情况进行比较。本研究描述了2015年至2018年期间在洛杉矶提供服务的诊所和社区国家dpp样本(两个诊所,两个cbo,共n = 265名参与者)的参与者特征和生活方式改变结果。分析检查了参与者的性别、年龄、种族/民族、基线体重指数和项目属性,如筛选方法和教学语言。负二项回归模型通过设置测试了项目出勤率、平均每周体力活动和体重变化百分比的差异。总体而言,参与者主要是西班牙裔/拉丁裔(81.51%)和女性(90.19%)。cbo开展的项目比诊所开展的项目更多地涉及包括黑人在内的其他种族/族裔群体(20.56%对0%);后者吸引了更多的男性(15.29%对7.22%)。在任何情况下,几乎没有参与者达到国家民进党的减肥目标(诊所:15.29%,CBO: 20.00%)。最初,参加以社区为基础的项目与较高的出勤率和平均每周体力活动有关,但在调整协变量后,相关性并不显著。研究结果对全国民进党的实施具有实践意义,并有助于为未来在洛杉矶和全国范围内扩大和推广该项目提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信