Evidence-Based Guideline on Critical Patient Transport and Handover to ICU.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2021-05-06 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/6618709
Tesfaye Belaneh Agizew, Henos Enyew Ashagrie, Habtamu Getinet Kassahun, Mamaru Mollalign Temesgen
{"title":"Evidence-Based Guideline on Critical Patient Transport and Handover to ICU.","authors":"Tesfaye Belaneh Agizew,&nbsp;Henos Enyew Ashagrie,&nbsp;Habtamu Getinet Kassahun,&nbsp;Mamaru Mollalign Temesgen","doi":"10.1155/2021/6618709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The perioperative period is a time in which significant physiological change occurs. Improper transfer of information at this point can lead to medical errors. Planning and preparation for critical patient transport to ICU is vital to prevent adverse events. Critical patient transport to ICU must be as safe as possible and should not cause additional risks. It needs good communication, planning, and appropriate staffing with standard monitoring. Evidence shows inconsistency and variability on the use of standardized protocols during critical patient transfer and handover to the ICU. There is a variety of controversial approaches about the need of sedation, use of end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring, and manual versus mechanical ventilation based on different evidence. The objective of this review was to recommend safer options of critical patient transfer to the ICU that help reduce patient morbidity and mortality. <i>Methods</i>. Google Scholars, PubMed through HINARI, and other search engines were used to search high-quality evidence that help reach appropriate conclusions. <i>Discussion</i>. Critical patient transfer and handover to ICU is a complex procedure that needs experienced hands, availability of appropriate team members, standard monitoring, and necessary emergency and patient-specific medications. Appropriate and adequate transfer of patient information to the receiving team decreases patient morbidity and mortality when the transfer team uses standardized checklist. <i>Conclusion</i>. Involvement of senior physicians, use of standard monitoring, and appropriate transfer of information have been shown to decrease critical patient morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2021 ","pages":"6618709"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118726/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6618709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The perioperative period is a time in which significant physiological change occurs. Improper transfer of information at this point can lead to medical errors. Planning and preparation for critical patient transport to ICU is vital to prevent adverse events. Critical patient transport to ICU must be as safe as possible and should not cause additional risks. It needs good communication, planning, and appropriate staffing with standard monitoring. Evidence shows inconsistency and variability on the use of standardized protocols during critical patient transfer and handover to the ICU. There is a variety of controversial approaches about the need of sedation, use of end-tidal CO2 monitoring, and manual versus mechanical ventilation based on different evidence. The objective of this review was to recommend safer options of critical patient transfer to the ICU that help reduce patient morbidity and mortality. Methods. Google Scholars, PubMed through HINARI, and other search engines were used to search high-quality evidence that help reach appropriate conclusions. Discussion. Critical patient transfer and handover to ICU is a complex procedure that needs experienced hands, availability of appropriate team members, standard monitoring, and necessary emergency and patient-specific medications. Appropriate and adequate transfer of patient information to the receiving team decreases patient morbidity and mortality when the transfer team uses standardized checklist. Conclusion. Involvement of senior physicians, use of standard monitoring, and appropriate transfer of information have been shown to decrease critical patient morbidity and mortality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

危重病人转移和转入ICU循证指南。
围手术期是发生显著生理变化的时期。此时信息传递不当可能导致医疗差错。计划和准备危重患者转移到ICU是防止不良事件的关键。危重患者转移到ICU必须尽可能安全,不应造成额外的风险。它需要良好的沟通、计划和适当的人员配备以及标准的监控。有证据表明,在危重患者转移和移交至ICU期间,标准化方案的使用存在不一致性和可变性。基于不同的证据,关于是否需要镇静、使用潮末CO2监测以及人工与机械通气存在各种有争议的方法。本综述的目的是推荐危重患者转至ICU的更安全的选择,以帮助降低患者的发病率和死亡率。方法。谷歌学者、PubMed通过HINARI和其他搜索引擎被用来搜索有助于得出适当结论的高质量证据。讨论。重症患者的转移和移交到ICU是一个复杂的过程,需要经验丰富的人员、合适的团队成员、标准的监测以及必要的急诊和患者特异性药物。当转诊团队使用标准化检查表时,适当和充分地将患者信息传递给接诊团队可以降低患者的发病率和死亡率。结论。资深医生的参与、标准监测的使用和适当的信息传递已被证明可以降低危重病人的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信