A Report on the Use of Telehealth in Otolaryngology in the Pre COVID-19 Era.

James C Wang, Nora C Elson, Madison V Epperson, Charles R Doarn, Mekibib Altaye, Meredith E Tabangin, Reena Dhanda Patil, Yash J Patil
{"title":"A Report on the Use of Telehealth in Otolaryngology in the Pre COVID-19 Era.","authors":"James C Wang, Nora C Elson, Madison V Epperson, Charles R Doarn, Mekibib Altaye, Meredith E Tabangin, Reena Dhanda Patil, Yash J Patil","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the integration of and barriers to the utilization of telehealth technology and its components (telemedicine, e-Health, m-health) in daily otolaryngologic practice before the SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. A national survey of members of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery was administered. Descriptive analyses were performed to determine how telehealth was employed in otolaryngologists' practices. Results: A total of 184 surveys were completed. Telehealth technology was used by 50% of otolaryngologists surveyed. Regions with the largest percentage of physicians using telehealth were the Mid-Atlantic region (84%) and West Coast (67%). Most otolaryngologists indicated that they were familiar with telehealth or any of its components and how it is used in practice (52-83%), they had heard of telehealth or any of its components but were unsure what the terms specifically entailed (17-42%); 53% were satisfied with their current use of telehealth and electronic medical record (EMR); and 72% were comfortable utilizing smart devices for patient care. Most otolaryngologists (65%) indicated reimbursement as the biggest limitation to implementing telehealth, and 67% believed that typing was a hindrance to EMR utility. Conclusion: Half of the surveyed otolaryngologists used some form of telehealth at the time of the survey. The most commonly cited obstacle to physician adoption of telehealth was reimbursement. Although the adoption of telehealth technology was still limited in the field of otolaryngology based on this study, we are now seeing significant change due to the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"334-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the integration of and barriers to the utilization of telehealth technology and its components (telemedicine, e-Health, m-health) in daily otolaryngologic practice before the SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. A national survey of members of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery was administered. Descriptive analyses were performed to determine how telehealth was employed in otolaryngologists' practices. Results: A total of 184 surveys were completed. Telehealth technology was used by 50% of otolaryngologists surveyed. Regions with the largest percentage of physicians using telehealth were the Mid-Atlantic region (84%) and West Coast (67%). Most otolaryngologists indicated that they were familiar with telehealth or any of its components and how it is used in practice (52-83%), they had heard of telehealth or any of its components but were unsure what the terms specifically entailed (17-42%); 53% were satisfied with their current use of telehealth and electronic medical record (EMR); and 72% were comfortable utilizing smart devices for patient care. Most otolaryngologists (65%) indicated reimbursement as the biggest limitation to implementing telehealth, and 67% believed that typing was a hindrance to EMR utility. Conclusion: Half of the surveyed otolaryngologists used some form of telehealth at the time of the survey. The most commonly cited obstacle to physician adoption of telehealth was reimbursement. Although the adoption of telehealth technology was still limited in the field of otolaryngology based on this study, we are now seeing significant change due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
COVID-19前时代耳鼻喉科远程医疗使用报告
目的:调查SARS - CoV-2 (COVID-19)大流行前,远程医疗技术及其组成部分(远程医疗、电子医疗、移动医疗)在日常耳鼻喉科实践中的整合情况和利用障碍。方法:横断面研究在某高等教育学术中心进行。对美国耳鼻喉头颈外科学会的成员进行了一项全国调查。进行描述性分析,以确定远程医疗是如何在耳鼻喉科医生的做法。结果:共完成问卷调查184份。接受调查的耳鼻喉科医生中有50%使用远程医疗技术。使用远程医疗的医生比例最高的地区是中大西洋地区(84%)和西海岸(67%)。大多数耳鼻喉科医生表示,他们熟悉远程医疗或其任何组成部分以及在实践中如何使用(52% -83%),他们听说过远程医疗或其任何组成部分,但不确定这些术语具体包括什么(17% -42%);53%的人对目前远程医疗和电子病历(EMR)的使用感到满意;72%的人愿意使用智能设备进行患者护理。大多数耳鼻喉科医生(65%)表示,报销是实施远程医疗的最大限制,67%的人认为打字是电子病历应用的障碍。结论:接受调查的耳鼻喉科医生中有一半在接受调查时使用了某种形式的远程医疗。医生采用远程保健最常提到的障碍是报销。尽管基于本研究,远程医疗技术在耳鼻喉科领域的应用仍然有限,但由于COVID-19大流行,我们现在看到了重大变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信