A Push-to-Talk Application as an Inter-Professional Communication Tool in an Emergency Department During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM Pub Date : 2021-05-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S308804
Osama Kentab, Khaled Soliman, Ahmad AAl Ibrahim, Abdulaziz Alresseeni, Khalid Aljohani, Muna Aljahany
{"title":"A Push-to-Talk Application as an Inter-Professional Communication Tool in an Emergency Department During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Osama Kentab,&nbsp;Khaled Soliman,&nbsp;Ahmad AAl Ibrahim,&nbsp;Abdulaziz Alresseeni,&nbsp;Khalid Aljohani,&nbsp;Muna Aljahany","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S308804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effects of using a smartphone-based push-to-talk (PTT) application on communication, safety, and clinical performance of emergency department (ED) workers during the COVID-19 outbreak.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>ED in an academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All ED staff members, including physicians (consultants, specialists, residents, and interns), nurses, emergency medical services staff, technicians (X-ray), and administration employees.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Eligible participants (n=128) were invited to fill out an online questionnaire 30 days after using a PTT application for sharing instant voice messages during the COVID-19 outbreak.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Self-reported data related to communication, implementation of personal protective measures, and clinical performance at the ED were collected and analyzed on a 5-item Likert scale (from 5 [strongly agree] to 1 [strongly disagree]). Also, the proportions of favorable responses (agree or strongly agree) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses of 119 participants (51.3% females, 58.8% nurses, and 34.5% physicians; 90.4% received at least one notification per day) were analyzed. The participants had favorable responses regarding all domains of communication (between 63.0% and 81.5%), taking precautionary infection control measures (between 49.6% and 79.0%), and performance (between 55.5% and 72.3%). Receiving fake and annoying alerts and application breakdowns were the lowest perceived limitations (between 12.5% and 21.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The assessed PTT application can be generalized to other departments and hospitals dealing with patients with COVID-19 to optimize staff safety and institutional preparedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":503614,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","volume":"13 ","pages":"189-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/ba/oaem-13-189.PMC8144178.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S308804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of using a smartphone-based push-to-talk (PTT) application on communication, safety, and clinical performance of emergency department (ED) workers during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Design: An observational, cross-sectional study.

Setting: ED in an academic medical center.

Participants: All ED staff members, including physicians (consultants, specialists, residents, and interns), nurses, emergency medical services staff, technicians (X-ray), and administration employees.

Interventions: Eligible participants (n=128) were invited to fill out an online questionnaire 30 days after using a PTT application for sharing instant voice messages during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Main outcome measures: Self-reported data related to communication, implementation of personal protective measures, and clinical performance at the ED were collected and analyzed on a 5-item Likert scale (from 5 [strongly agree] to 1 [strongly disagree]). Also, the proportions of favorable responses (agree or strongly agree) were calculated.

Results: Responses of 119 participants (51.3% females, 58.8% nurses, and 34.5% physicians; 90.4% received at least one notification per day) were analyzed. The participants had favorable responses regarding all domains of communication (between 63.0% and 81.5%), taking precautionary infection control measures (between 49.6% and 79.0%), and performance (between 55.5% and 72.3%). Receiving fake and annoying alerts and application breakdowns were the lowest perceived limitations (between 12.5% and 21.0%).

Conclusion: The assessed PTT application can be generalized to other departments and hospitals dealing with patients with COVID-19 to optimize staff safety and institutional preparedness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新型冠状病毒病疫情期间急诊科跨专业沟通工具的一键通应用
目的:评估新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间使用基于智能手机的一键通(PTT)应用程序对急诊科(ED)工作人员通信、安全和临床表现的影响。设计:观察性横断面研究。环境:学术医疗中心的急诊科。参与者:所有急诊科工作人员,包括医生(顾问、专家、住院医生和实习生)、护士、急诊医务人员、技术人员(x光)和行政人员。干预措施:在COVID-19爆发期间使用PTT应用程序共享即时语音消息30天后,邀请符合条件的参与者(n=128)填写在线问卷。主要结局指标:收集与沟通、个人防护措施实施和急诊科临床表现相关的自我报告数据,并以5项李克特量表(从5分[强烈同意]到1分[强烈不同意])进行分析。此外,还计算了赞成回答(同意或非常同意)的比例。结果:119名参与者中,女性占51.3%,护士占58.8%,医生占34.5%;90.4%的人每天至少收到一次通知)。参与者对所有传播领域(63.0%至81.5%),采取预防性感染控制措施(49.6%至79.0%)和绩效(55.5%至72.3%)的反应都很好。接收虚假和烦人的警报和应用程序崩溃是感知到的最低限制(在12.5%到21.0%之间)。结论:评估后的PTT应用可推广到其他科室和医院处理COVID-19患者,以优化人员安全和机构准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信