Parent and Physician Report of Discussions About Prognosis for Critically Ill Children.

Lauren Rissman, Sabrina Derrington, Karen Rychlik, Kelly N Michelson
{"title":"Parent and Physician Report of Discussions About Prognosis for Critically Ill Children.","authors":"Lauren Rissman,&nbsp;Sabrina Derrington,&nbsp;Karen Rychlik,&nbsp;Kelly N Michelson","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000002764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Parents value clear communication with PICU clinicians about possible patient and family outcomes (prognostic conversations). We describe PICU parent and attending physician reports and agreement regarding the occurrence of prognostic conversations. We queried parents and physicians about prognostic conversation content, which healthcare providers had prognostic conversations, and whether parents wanted more prognostic information.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cross-sectional survey study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University-based 40-bed PICU.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Parents and attending physicians of PICU patients with multiple organ dysfunction within 24 hours of PICU admission.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Surveys administered to parents and attending PICU physicians 5-10 days after PICU admission.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Surveys asked parents and physicians to report the occurrence of prognostic conversations related to PICU length of stay, risk of PICU mortality, and anticipated post-PICU physical, neurologic, and psychologic morbidities for patients and post-PICU psychologic morbidities for parents. Of 101 participants, 87 parents and 83 physicians reported having prognostic conversations. Overall concordance between parents and physicians was fair (Kappa = 0.22). Parents and physicians most commonly reported prognostic conversations about PICU length of stay (67.3% and 63.3%, respectively) and patient post-PICU physical morbidity (n = 48; 48.5% and n = 45; 44.5% respectively). Conversations reported less often by parents and physicians were about patient post-PICU psychologic morbidity (n = 13; 12.9% and n = 20; 19.8%, respectively). Per parent report, bedside nurses and physicians provided most prognostic information. Chaplains (n = 14; 50%) and social workers (n = 17; 60%) were more involved in conversations regarding parent psychologic morbidities. Most commonly, parents requested more information about length of stay and their child's physical morbidities. Parents less frequently wanted information about their own psychologic morbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most parents and physicians report having prognostic conversations, primarily about length of stay and post-ICU physical morbidities. Concordance between parents and physicians is suboptimal. Future studies should evaluate prognostic conversations at other timepoints, how information is delivered, and how these conversations impact the PICU experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":520744,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies","volume":" ","pages":"785-794"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objectives: Parents value clear communication with PICU clinicians about possible patient and family outcomes (prognostic conversations). We describe PICU parent and attending physician reports and agreement regarding the occurrence of prognostic conversations. We queried parents and physicians about prognostic conversation content, which healthcare providers had prognostic conversations, and whether parents wanted more prognostic information.

Design: Prospective cross-sectional survey study.

Setting: University-based 40-bed PICU.

Participants: Parents and attending physicians of PICU patients with multiple organ dysfunction within 24 hours of PICU admission.

Interventions: Surveys administered to parents and attending PICU physicians 5-10 days after PICU admission.

Measurements and main results: Surveys asked parents and physicians to report the occurrence of prognostic conversations related to PICU length of stay, risk of PICU mortality, and anticipated post-PICU physical, neurologic, and psychologic morbidities for patients and post-PICU psychologic morbidities for parents. Of 101 participants, 87 parents and 83 physicians reported having prognostic conversations. Overall concordance between parents and physicians was fair (Kappa = 0.22). Parents and physicians most commonly reported prognostic conversations about PICU length of stay (67.3% and 63.3%, respectively) and patient post-PICU physical morbidity (n = 48; 48.5% and n = 45; 44.5% respectively). Conversations reported less often by parents and physicians were about patient post-PICU psychologic morbidity (n = 13; 12.9% and n = 20; 19.8%, respectively). Per parent report, bedside nurses and physicians provided most prognostic information. Chaplains (n = 14; 50%) and social workers (n = 17; 60%) were more involved in conversations regarding parent psychologic morbidities. Most commonly, parents requested more information about length of stay and their child's physical morbidities. Parents less frequently wanted information about their own psychologic morbidities.

Conclusions: Most parents and physicians report having prognostic conversations, primarily about length of stay and post-ICU physical morbidities. Concordance between parents and physicians is suboptimal. Future studies should evaluate prognostic conversations at other timepoints, how information is delivered, and how these conversations impact the PICU experience.

家长与医生讨论危重患儿预后报告。
目的:家长重视与PICU临床医生就可能的患者和家庭结果(预后对话)进行清晰的沟通。我们描述了PICU家长和主治医生关于预后对话发生的报告和协议。我们询问了父母和医生关于预后对话的内容,哪些医疗保健提供者有预后对话,以及父母是否想要更多的预后信息。设计:前瞻性横断面调查研究。环境:校级40床PICU。研究对象:PICU入院24小时内多器官功能障碍患者的家长及主治医师。干预措施:PICU入院后5-10天对家长和PICU主治医师进行调查。测量方法和主要结果:调查要求家长和医生报告与PICU住院时间、PICU死亡风险、PICU后患者预期的身体、神经和心理发病率以及PICU后父母的心理发病率相关的预后对话的发生情况。在101名参与者中,87名家长和83名医生报告进行了预后对话。家长与医生的总体一致性比较好(Kappa = 0.22)。父母和医生最常报告的预后对话是PICU住院时间(分别为67.3%和63.3%)和患者PICU后身体发病率(n = 48;48.5%, n = 45;44.5%)。父母和医生较少报告关于picu后患者心理疾病的对话(n = 13;12.9%, n = 20;分别为19.8%)。根据家长报告,床边护士和医生提供了大多数预后信息。牧师(n = 14;50%)和社会工作者(n = 17;60%)更多地参与有关父母心理疾病的对话。最常见的是,父母要求提供更多关于住院时间长短和孩子身体疾病的信息。父母很少想知道自己的心理疾病。结论:大多数家长和医生报告有预后对话,主要是关于住院时间和icu后的身体发病率。父母和医生之间的一致性是次优的。未来的研究应该评估其他时间点的预后对话,信息如何传递,以及这些对话如何影响PICU的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信