Thromboprophylaxis in Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Surgery.

IF 1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Alexios D Iliadis, Anna Timms, Sharron Fugazzotto, Penina Edel, Simon Britten, Jonathan Wright, David Goodier, Peter Calder
{"title":"Thromboprophylaxis in Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Surgery.","authors":"Alexios D Iliadis, Anna Timms, Sharron Fugazzotto, Penina Edel, Simon Britten, Jonathan Wright, David Goodier, Peter Calder","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim The use of intramedullary lengthening devices is becoming increasingly popular. There are limited data regarding the incidence of venous thromboembolism following intramedullary lengthening surgery and no reports or guidance for current practice on use of thromboprophylaxis. Following a case of post-operative deep vein thrombosis in our institution, we felt that it is important to assess best practice. We conducted a national survey to collect data that would describe current practice and help develop consensus for treatment. Materials and methods We identified surgeons across the UK that perform adult intramedullary limb lengthening through the British Limb Reconstruction Society membership and a Precise Users database. Surgeons were contacted and asked to respond to an online survey. Responses to thromboprophylaxis regimes employed in their practice and cases of venous thromboembolism were collated. Results 24 out of 54 surgeons identified responded with a total of 454 cases of adult intramedullary lengthening (352 femoral and 102 tibial nails) performed over a five year period (January 2015–January 2020). Only one case of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) following femoral lengthening was reported. There is wide variability in practice both in terms of thromboprophylaxis risk assessment, choice of medications and duration of treatment. The vast majority of surgeons (85%) felt that there was insufficient evidence available to guide their practice. Conclusions Intramedullary lengthening is a surgical treatment growing in popularity. There are limited data available to guide decision-making regarding aspects of treatment such as thromboprophylaxis. This is reflected in the wide variation in practice reported in this study. There are both a need and a desire to gather data that will allow us to come to a consensus and to guide safe practice. Clinical significance Venous thromboembolism is a potential complication of lower limb lengthening surgery. We report on national incidence and current practices of thromboprophylaxis to allow for informed decision-making and help develop consensus for best practice. How to cite this article Iliadis AD, Timms A, Fugazzotto S, et al. Thromboprophylaxis in Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Surgery. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(3):151-156.","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"15 3","pages":"151-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/05/stlr-15-151.PMC8121112.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aim The use of intramedullary lengthening devices is becoming increasingly popular. There are limited data regarding the incidence of venous thromboembolism following intramedullary lengthening surgery and no reports or guidance for current practice on use of thromboprophylaxis. Following a case of post-operative deep vein thrombosis in our institution, we felt that it is important to assess best practice. We conducted a national survey to collect data that would describe current practice and help develop consensus for treatment. Materials and methods We identified surgeons across the UK that perform adult intramedullary limb lengthening through the British Limb Reconstruction Society membership and a Precise Users database. Surgeons were contacted and asked to respond to an online survey. Responses to thromboprophylaxis regimes employed in their practice and cases of venous thromboembolism were collated. Results 24 out of 54 surgeons identified responded with a total of 454 cases of adult intramedullary lengthening (352 femoral and 102 tibial nails) performed over a five year period (January 2015–January 2020). Only one case of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) following femoral lengthening was reported. There is wide variability in practice both in terms of thromboprophylaxis risk assessment, choice of medications and duration of treatment. The vast majority of surgeons (85%) felt that there was insufficient evidence available to guide their practice. Conclusions Intramedullary lengthening is a surgical treatment growing in popularity. There are limited data available to guide decision-making regarding aspects of treatment such as thromboprophylaxis. This is reflected in the wide variation in practice reported in this study. There are both a need and a desire to gather data that will allow us to come to a consensus and to guide safe practice. Clinical significance Venous thromboembolism is a potential complication of lower limb lengthening surgery. We report on national incidence and current practices of thromboprophylaxis to allow for informed decision-making and help develop consensus for best practice. How to cite this article Iliadis AD, Timms A, Fugazzotto S, et al. Thromboprophylaxis in Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Surgery. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(3):151-156.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

髓内肢体延长手术中的血栓预防。
目的:髓内延长装置的使用越来越普遍。关于髓内延长手术后静脉血栓栓塞发生率的数据有限,目前尚无关于血栓预防使用的报告或指南。继我院一例术后深静脉血栓形成后,我们认为评估最佳实践是很重要的。我们进行了一项全国性的调查,以收集描述当前实践的数据,并帮助制定治疗共识。材料和方法:我们通过英国肢体重建协会会员和精确用户数据库确定了英国各地进行成人髓内肢体延长的外科医生。他们联系了外科医生,并要求他们对一项在线调查做出回应。在他们的实践和静脉血栓栓塞的情况下,对血栓预防制度的反应进行了整理。结果:在5年期间(2015年1月- 2020年1月),54位外科医生中有24位对454例成人髓内延长(352例股钉和102例胫钉)做出了回应。仅报告一例股骨延长术后深静脉血栓形成(DVT)。在血栓预防风险评估、药物选择和治疗持续时间方面,在实践中存在广泛的差异。绝大多数外科医生(85%)认为没有足够的证据来指导他们的实践。结论:髓内延长术是一种越来越受欢迎的手术治疗方法。有有限的数据可用于指导决策方面的治疗,如血栓预防。这反映在本研究报告的实践差异很大。我们既需要也渴望收集数据,使我们能够达成共识,并指导安全实践。临床意义:静脉血栓栓塞是下肢延长手术的潜在并发症。我们报告国家发病率和目前的血栓预防实践,以允许知情决策和帮助制定最佳实践的共识。如何引用本文:Iliadis AD, Timms A, Fugazzotto S等。髓内肢体延长手术中的血栓预防。创伤肢体重建,2020;15(3):151-156。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction is dedicated to surgeons, allied medical professionals and researchers in the field of orthopaedics and trauma. The scope of the journal is to discuss the fields of skeletal injury, and the complications thereof, congenital and acquired limb deformities and deficiencies, and orthopaedic-related infection, together with their surgical and non-surgical treatments. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, case reports, descriptions of new or recognised treatment techniques, forum discussions of clinical scenarios and relevant correspondence. It aims to provide a widely accessible source of useful information to practitioners in the field through the problem- or technique-based approach of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信