Effectiveness of a clinical decision-support tool on adherence to prescribing and practice guidelines of high-risk antidepressant medications in geriatric patients.

The Mental Health Clinician Pub Date : 2021-05-12 eCollection Date: 2021-05-01 DOI:10.9740/mhc.2021.05.181
Madeline A VanDaele, Jordan O Smith, Jessica Bovio Franck
{"title":"Effectiveness of a clinical decision-support tool on adherence to prescribing and practice guidelines of high-risk antidepressant medications in geriatric patients.","authors":"Madeline A VanDaele,&nbsp;Jordan O Smith,&nbsp;Jessica Bovio Franck","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2021.05.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>TCAs and paroxetine, a SSRI, are associated with safety risks in geriatric patients because of anticholinergic properties. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the impact of a clinical decision-support tool (CDST) on adherence with medication prescribing and practice guidance to enhance patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mental health clinical pharmacy specialists and clinical pharmacy leadership led a multidisciplinary creation and integration of a CDST within a Veterans Health Administration EHR. The CDST focused on the following elements when prescribing TCAs and paroxetine in geriatric patients: clinical justification for initiation of the medication, provision of patient/caregiver education specific to the medication prescribed, evaluation of comprehension of education provided, medication reconciliation, and follow-up completed within 30 days of medication initiation. Following activation of the CDST in the EHR, measures were evaluated before intervention and after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After intervention, an increase was observed in the primary outcome of the proportion of patients having documentation of all of the following: clinical justification for medication initiation, provision of patient/caregiver education, evaluation of comprehension of education provided, medication reconciliation, and follow-up completed within 30 days of medication initiation (<i>P</i> = .01). Individual proportions of patients with documented medication reconciliation and follow-up completed within 30 days significantly increased. All other secondary outcomes numerically increased but did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Improvement was seen in adherence with prescribing and practice guidance following the implementation of the CDST. This suggests the beneficial role of CDSTs within the EHR to optimize patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"11 3","pages":"181-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/71/c2/i2168-9709-11-3-181.PMC8120984.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Mental Health Clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2021.05.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: TCAs and paroxetine, a SSRI, are associated with safety risks in geriatric patients because of anticholinergic properties. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the impact of a clinical decision-support tool (CDST) on adherence with medication prescribing and practice guidance to enhance patient safety.

Methods: Mental health clinical pharmacy specialists and clinical pharmacy leadership led a multidisciplinary creation and integration of a CDST within a Veterans Health Administration EHR. The CDST focused on the following elements when prescribing TCAs and paroxetine in geriatric patients: clinical justification for initiation of the medication, provision of patient/caregiver education specific to the medication prescribed, evaluation of comprehension of education provided, medication reconciliation, and follow-up completed within 30 days of medication initiation. Following activation of the CDST in the EHR, measures were evaluated before intervention and after intervention.

Results: After intervention, an increase was observed in the primary outcome of the proportion of patients having documentation of all of the following: clinical justification for medication initiation, provision of patient/caregiver education, evaluation of comprehension of education provided, medication reconciliation, and follow-up completed within 30 days of medication initiation (P = .01). Individual proportions of patients with documented medication reconciliation and follow-up completed within 30 days significantly increased. All other secondary outcomes numerically increased but did not reach statistical significance.

Discussion: Improvement was seen in adherence with prescribing and practice guidance following the implementation of the CDST. This suggests the beneficial role of CDSTs within the EHR to optimize patient safety.

Abstract Image

临床决策支持工具对老年患者高危抗抑郁药物处方和实践指南依从性的有效性
导论:TCAs和帕罗西汀(一种SSRI)由于抗胆碱能特性,在老年患者中存在安全风险。该项目的目的是评估临床决策支持工具(CDST)对依从药物处方和实践指导的影响,以提高患者的安全。方法:心理健康临床药学专家和临床药学领导领导了退伍军人健康管理局电子病历中CDST的多学科创建和整合。CDST在为老年患者开tca和帕罗西汀处方时关注以下因素:开始用药的临床理由、提供针对所开药物的患者/护理人员教育、对所提供教育的理解程度的评估、药物和解以及在开始用药后30天内完成的随访。在EHR中激活CDST后,在干预前和干预后对措施进行评估。结果:干预后,具有以下所有文件的患者比例的主要结局有所增加:开始用药的临床理由,提供患者/护理人员教育,评估所提供的教育的理解程度,药物和解以及在开始用药后30天内完成随访(P = 0.01)。在30天内完成药物调节和随访的患者个体比例显著增加。所有其他次要结局在数字上均有所增加,但未达到统计学意义。讨论:在实施CDST后,在遵守处方和实践指导方面看到了改善。这表明cdst在EHR优化患者安全方面的有益作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信