Transfusion timing relative to surgery does not impact outcomes in hip fracture patients.

IF 1.5
Rown Parola, Sanjit R Konda, Cody R Perskin, Abhishek Ganta, Kenneth A Egol
{"title":"Transfusion timing relative to surgery does not impact outcomes in hip fracture patients.","authors":"Rown Parola, Sanjit R Konda, Cody R Perskin, Abhishek Ganta, Kenneth A Egol","doi":"10.1007/s00590-021-03033-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of blood transfusion timing in hip fracture patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive series of hip fracture patients 55 years and older who required a blood transfusion during hospitalization were reviewed for demographic, injury, clinical outcome, and cost information. A validated risk predictive score (STTGMA) was calculated for each patient. Patients were stratified to preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative first transfusion cohorts. The intraoperative and postoperative cohorts were matched by STTGMA, sex, and procedure to the preoperative cohort. Baseline patient characteristics and outcomes were compared before and after matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to matching, the preoperative cohort was more often male (p < 0.001) with increased Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.012), ASA class (p < 0.002), STTGMA (p < 0.001), total transfused volume (p = 0.002), incidence of inpatient mortality (p = 0.045), myocardial infarction (p = 0.005) and cardiac arrest (p = 0.014). After matching, the preoperative cohort had increased total transfused volume (p = 0.015) and decreased pneumonia incidence (p = 0.040).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Matching STTGMA score, sex, and procedure results in non-inferior outcomes among hip fracture patients receiving preoperative first blood transfusions compared to intraoperative and postoperative transfusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520619,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie","volume":" ","pages":"725-732"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03033-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of blood transfusion timing in hip fracture patients.

Methods: A consecutive series of hip fracture patients 55 years and older who required a blood transfusion during hospitalization were reviewed for demographic, injury, clinical outcome, and cost information. A validated risk predictive score (STTGMA) was calculated for each patient. Patients were stratified to preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative first transfusion cohorts. The intraoperative and postoperative cohorts were matched by STTGMA, sex, and procedure to the preoperative cohort. Baseline patient characteristics and outcomes were compared before and after matching.

Results: Prior to matching, the preoperative cohort was more often male (p < 0.001) with increased Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.012), ASA class (p < 0.002), STTGMA (p < 0.001), total transfused volume (p = 0.002), incidence of inpatient mortality (p = 0.045), myocardial infarction (p = 0.005) and cardiac arrest (p = 0.014). After matching, the preoperative cohort had increased total transfused volume (p = 0.015) and decreased pneumonia incidence (p = 0.040).

Conclusion: Matching STTGMA score, sex, and procedure results in non-inferior outcomes among hip fracture patients receiving preoperative first blood transfusions compared to intraoperative and postoperative transfusions.

输血时间相对于手术时间并不影响髋部骨折患者的预后。
目的:本研究的目的是确定输血时机对髋部骨折患者的影响。方法:对55岁及以上住院期间需要输血的连续一系列髋部骨折患者进行人口统计学、损伤、临床结局和费用信息的回顾。计算每位患者的有效风险预测评分(STTGMA)。患者被分为术前、术中或术后首次输血组。术中和术后队列按STTGMA、性别和手术方式与术前队列相匹配。比较配对前后患者的基线特征和结果。结果:在匹配之前,术前队列中更多的是男性(p)。结论:与术中和术后输血相比,匹配STTGMA评分、性别和手术方式的髋部骨折患者术前首次输血的结果不差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书